TITLE

Employer sanctions law is ruled legal by judge

PUB. DATE
February 2008
SOURCE
Inside Tucson Business;2/11/2008, Vol. 17 Issue 36, p3
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on a ruling of the U.S. District Court Neil Wake over the new employer sanctions law in Tucson, Arizona. According to Wake, employer sanctions law does not violate the constitutional rights for business or employees. The ruling is a disappointing surprise to many business organizations that had joined in filing a lawsuit challenging the state law that it is an illegal attempt by the state to interfere with federal law.
ACCESSION #
30029968

 

Related Articles

  • Two new suits seek to stop employer law. Pangburn, Joe // Inside Tucson Business;12/17/2007, Vol. 17 Issue 27, p1 

    The article reports that two more lawsuits have been filed which challenged Arizona's employer sanctions law. The lawsuits came after the dismissal of the original suit saying that the wrong defendants were named as defendants by U.S. District Court Judge Neil V. Wake. One of the new lawsuits...

  • Employer sanctions law is legal appeals court rules.  // Inside Tucson Business;3/16/2009, Vol. 18 Issue 42, p3 

    The article reports that a U.S. District Court ruling, upholding Arizona's employer sanctions law that suspends or revokes business licenses of employers found to have knowingly hired illegal workers, has been affirmed by the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on March 11, 2009. The appeals...

  • Abuse of Justice. Shariff, M. Y. // Economic & Political Weekly;6/28/2014, Vol. 49 Issue 26/27, p5 

    Two letters to the editor are presented in response to the article "Akshardham Judgment I: The Law at Work" by Ravi Nair and "Akshardam: Judgment II: Between Callousness and Complicity" by Saurav Datta in the June 21, 2014 issue.

  • Court of Appeal to rule on Brightlingsea dispute over restrictive covenant. Dyer, Clare // British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition);5/10/1986, Vol. 292 Issue 6530, p1242 

    Focuses on the court case on brightlingsea dispute over restrictive covenant. Ruling of the Court of Appeals on the case; Notification of retirement; Recollection of previous High Court decision.

  • Excerpts From Ruling in Richmond V. J.A. Croson Company.  // Education Week;2/1/1989, Vol. 8 Issue 19, p20 

    Several excerpts from the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in "City of Richmond versus J.A. Croson Co." are presented.

  • Cornell studies double standard on appeal.  // Nation's Restaurant News;8/27/2001, Vol. 35 Issue 35, p22 

    Reports the increasing trend of overturned court decision upon appeal favoring sued employers.

  • NEWS & BRIEFS: Suit and Countersuit--Both Lose.  // Advocate;3/26/75, Issue 160, p5 

    Focuses on the dismissal of the suit which was filed by Boulder, Colorado-based gay organization Boulder Gay Liberation against Boulder-based newspaper 'Daily Camera,' with libel by judge Williams D. Neighbors. Ruling by the judge.

  • JUDGMENTS.  // Westchester County Business Journal;2/20/2012, Vol. 48 Issue 8, p20 

    The article offers information on the judgments given to court cases involving various companies in Westchester County, New York including Acre Associates LLC, AGM Management Consultants Inc., and Gar Painting LLC.

  • Alaska demands resolution to Miller's election challenge. D'Aprile, Shane // Hill;12/2/2010, Vol. 17 Issue 124, p12 

    The article reports on the demand of the state government of Alaska to have a ruling on the lawsuit filed by Republican Joe Miller contesting the legitimacy of the state Senate election in which U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski was declared as the winner.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics