TITLE

Leased Employees and ERISA Benefits

AUTHOR(S)
Hatch, D. Diane; Hall, James E.
PUB. DATE
April 2000
SOURCE
Workforce (10928332);Apr2000, Vol. 79 Issue 4, p86
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Features a case filed by Sheila Wolf against Coca-Cola Co. before the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Accusations against Coca-Cola Co.; Judgment of the court on the case.
ACCESSION #
2976833

 

Related Articles

  • District Court Must Reconsider Issues Regarding Long-Term Disability Benefits.  // Legal-Legislative Reporter;May2008, Vol. 42 Issue 5, p7 

    The article discusses the court case Byars v. The Coca-Cola Company et al, wherein the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed and remanded a district court decision on long-term disability benefits. The plaintiff was employed by the defendant company for 23 years. The employee...

  • US court clears Coca-Cola of involvement in murders.  // Employers Law;Sep2009, p6 

    The article focuses on the ruling of the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals which supported the decision of a federal district court in Miami, Florida to dismiss four cases of alleged liability of Coca-Cola and subsidiaries Panamco and Bebidas for the killing and torture of trade unionists by...

  • Appeals court allows RICO suit to continue.  // AHA News;3/25/2002, Vol. 38 Issue 11, p7 

    Reports on the ruling of the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on the right of plaintiffs to sue cases on the violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. Accusations against health maintenance organizations; Plaintiffs in the case.

  • Appeals Court Throws Out Race-Conscious Admissions Policy At UGA.  // Black Issues in Higher Education;9/13/2001, Vol. 18 Issue 15, p15 

    Focuses on the ruling of the 11th United States Circuit Court of Appeals on the unconstitutional admissions policy at the University of Georgia in Atlanta. Decrease in enrollment of minority students; Percentage of Black students in the university.

  • EXPERT'S COMMUNICATIONS WITH NON-ATTORNEYS HELD DISCOVER. YEARICK, GARTH T. // Litigation News;Spring2014, Vol. 39 Issue 3, p2 

    The article discusses the U.S. Court of Appeals case Republic of Ecuador v. Hinchee, which deals with work-product protections and testimony of expert's notes and communications with non-attorneys. It mentions the argument on 39 specific documents which consist the notes prepared by doctor...

  • THE INTERPRETATION OF CONTEXT: HOW SOME FEDERAL CIRCUITS ARE BYPASSING THE FAMILIAR REQUIREMENT OF FIRSTHAND KNOWLEDGE FOR LAY WITNESSES. Ward III, Joseph Richard // Loyola Journal of Public Interest Law;Fall2013, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p117 

    The article discusses bypassing of the requirement of first hand knowledge for lay witnesses by U.S. circuit courts. The topics discussed include the judgment by U.S. court of appeals in United States v. Jayyaousi case, the U.S. Patriot Act of 2001, and U.S. federal rules of evidence 701, 702,...

  • DAVIS V. UNITED STATES: WHY THE SUPREME COURT SHOULD PRESERVE JUDICIAL INTEGRITY AND PREVENT FURTHER EROSION OF THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE. Campbell, Christopher A. // Faulkner Law Review;Spring2011, Vol. 2 Issue 2, p361 

    The article discusses the need for the U.S. Supreme Court to preserve judicial integrity and to prevent further erosion of the exclusionary rule. It highlights the case United States v. Davis wherein the Eleventh Circuit has declined to exclude evidence obtained by law enforcement officers. It...

  • The Eleventh Circuit Creates Uncertainty by Applying the Rule of Lenity in United States v. Izurieta. DiVita, Catherine // Boston College Law Review;2014 E. Supp., Vol. 55 Issue 6, preceding p115 

    On February 22, 2013, in United States v. Izurieta, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit found 18 U.S.C. § 545--a federal statute crimi-nalizing the importation of goods "contrary to law"--ambiguous as to whether it criminalizes violations of a regulation and, as a result,...

  • Young Lawyer's Corner: Those Pesky Rules. Eliseuson, Anthony T. // Appellate Practice Journal;Spring2014, Vol. 33 Issue 2, p14 

    The article provides information on the importance of complying with the rules associated with U.S. appellate practice. Topics discussed include circuit rules, the Heinen v. Northrop Grumman Corp. case, and the differences between federal and state rules. Also mentioned are details on various...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics