Protected Activity and the ADA
- ADA Cannot Dictate Insurance Coverage. Brostoff, Steven // National Underwriter / Life & Health Financial Services;1/17/2000, Vol. 104 Issue 3, p1
Reports that the United States Supreme Court refused to hear a challenge to an appellate court decision in January 2000 about the regulation under the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) regarding insurance policies. Overview of the case, Doe versus Mutual of Omaha; Implication of the Supreme...
- Court Lets Stand Ruling Allowing School To Refuse Religious Ad. Walsh, Mark // Education Week;04/26/2000, Vol. 19 Issue 33, p34
No abstract available.
- Supreme Court Limits Scope of ADA. Boswell, Susan // ASHA Leader;2/19/2002, Vol. 7 Issue 3, p1
Reports on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to limit the definition of disability to a substantial limitation on abilities that are central to everyday life and not to specific job-related tasks. Description of the case of Ella Williams, who has carpal tunnel syndrome; Impact of the ruling.
- New NCAA rules challenged. Diegmueller, Karen // Teacher Magazine;Feb96, Vol. 7 Issue 5, p14
Reports that the National Collegiate Athletic Association's (NCAA) rules which barred students with learning disabilities from competing for athletic scholarships has been challenged in court. Name of challenger; Requirements of NCAA; Reference to the Americans With Disabilities Act;...
- How Has the Supreme Court Affected the Americans with Disabilities Act? You Be the Judge... Huber, Joseph // Palaestra;Winter2000, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p57
Focuses on the issue on the decision of the United States Supreme Court regarding who are entitled to protection under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) on the case involving United Airlines. Comments from professor Chai Feldblum about the decision; Result of the survey conducted by...
- listening to the supremes. Weisman, James J. // WE Magazine;Jul/Aug2000, Vol. 4 Issue 4, p110
Analyzes the decision of the United States Supreme Court on cases relating to the Americans With Disabilities Act. Mandate imposed by the act; Yeskey v. Pennsylvania; Garrett v. the University of Alabama at Birmingham.
- Two for One. Paris, Ellen // Entrepreneur;Dec1999, Vol. 27 Issue 12, p38
Reports that the United States Supreme Court decided that the Social Security law does not take into consideration the idea of reasonable accomodation in lawsuits related to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Impact of the decision on employers; Contradictory positions in Social...
- NLRB Returns to Traditional 'Make-Whole' Relief Rules. Deschenaux, Joanne // HR Magazine;Aug2011, Vol. 56 Issue 8, p17
The article reports on the decision of the U.S. National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) granting employees a "make-whole" relief when their employers are proven to have implemented illegal unilateral changes.
- Courts affirm no parity for behavioral LTD under ADA. Gunsauley, Craig // Employee Benefit News;Sep99, Vol. 13 Issue 10, p11
Reports on the decision of the fourth United States Circuit Court of Appeals that the Americans With Disabilities Act does not require parity for long-term mental disability benefits in an employer-sponsored employee benefits plan. Basis of the decision; Arguments of the Court for the decision;...