TITLE

Effect of Compression Ratio on Speech Recognition and Speech-Quality Ratings With Wide Dynamic Range Compression Amplification

AUTHOR(S)
Boike, Kumiko T.; Souza, Pamela E.
PUB. DATE
April 2000
SOURCE
Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research;Apr2000, Vol. 43 Issue 2, p456
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This project examined the effect of varying compression ratio on speech recognition and quality. Both listeners with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss and a control group of listeners with normal hearing participated. Test materials were sentences from the Connected Speech Test (R. M. Cox, G. C. Alexander, & C. Gilmore, 1987) which were digitally processed with linear amplification and wide dynamic range compression amplification with 3 compression ratios. Speech-recognition scores were obtained with sentences in quiet and in noise at a 10-dB signal-to-noise ratio for each amplification condition. Additionally, the participants rated each amplification condition in terms of clarity, pleasantness, ease of understanding, and overall impression. Results indicated that, for speech in quiet, compression ratio had no effect on speech-recognition scores; however, speech-quality ratings decreased as compression ratio increased. For speech in noise, both speech-recognition scores and ratings decreased with increasing compression ratio for the listeners with hearing loss. These results suggest that selection of compression ratio on the basis of speech-quality judgments does not compromise speech recognition.
ACCESSION #
2953510

 

Related Articles

  • Perceptual Weighting of Relative Amplitude and Formant Transition Cues in Aided CV Syllables. Hedrick, Mark; Younger, Mary Sue // Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research;Oct2001, Vol. 44 Issue 5, p964 

    The current study explored the changes in weighting of relative amplitude and formant transition cues that may be caused by a K-amp circuit. Twelve listeners with normal hearing and 3 listeners with sensorineural hearing loss labeled the stop consonant place of articulation of synthetic...

  • Comparison of Performance with Wide Dynamic Range Compression and Linear Amplification. Kam, Anna C. S.; Kam, Anna C.S.; Wong, Lena L.N.; Wong, Lena L. N. // Journal of the American Academy of Audiology;Sep1999, Vol. 10 Issue 9, p445 

    This study compared subject performance and preference using a compression-limiting hearing aid set to linear amplification (program 1) and wide dynamic range compression (WDRC, program 2). The frequency responses of the hearing aid were matched to a 65 dB SPL signal and maximum output to a...

  • Effects of the Acoustical Dynamic Range on Speech Recognition with Cochlear Implants. Cosendai, Gregoire; Pelizzone, Marco // Audiology: Journal of Auditory Communication;Sep/Oct2001, Vol. 40 Issue 5, p56 

    The amplitude compression function in a speech processor for cochlear implants maps the wide acoustical dynamic range of sounds into the smaller electrical dynamic range available on the implanted electrodes. In this study, we examined the effects of systematic variations of the acoustical...

  • The Acceptance of Background Noise in Adult Cochlear Implant Users. Plyler, Patrick N.; Bahng, Junghwa; Von Hapsburg, Deborah // Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research;Apr2008, Vol. 51 Issue 2, p502 

    Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine (a) if acceptable noise levels (ANLs) are different in cochlear implant (CI) users than in listeners with normal hearing, (b) if ANLs are related to sentence reception thresholds in noise in CI users, and (c) if ANLs and subjective outcome...

  • The Objective and Subjective Evaluation of Low-Frequency Expansion in Wide Dynamic Range Compression Hearing Instruments. Lowery, Kristy J.; Plyler, Patrick N. // Journal of the American Academy of Audiology;Sep2007, Vol. 18 Issue 8, p641 

    The effects of low-frequency expansion on the objective and subjective evaluation of four channel in-the-ear hearing instruments was investigated. Three expansion settings were programmed in each device: expansion off, expansion restricted to channel one, and expansion restricted to channels one...

  • Audiovisual Segregation in Cochlear Implant Users. Landry, Simon; Bacon, Benoit A.; Leybaert, Jacqueline; Gagn�, Jean-Pierre; Champoux, Fran�ois // PLoS ONE;Mar2012, Vol. 7 Issue 3, p1 

    It has traditionally been assumed that cochlear implant users de facto perform atypically in audiovisual tasks. However, a recent study that combined an auditory task with visual distractors suggests that only those cochlear implant users that are not proficient at recognizing speech sounds...

  • Ranking Hearing Aid Input--Output Functions for Understanding Low-, Conversational-, and High-Level Speech in Multitalker Babble. King Chung; Killion, Mead C.; Christensen, Laurel A. // Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research;Apr2007, Vol. 50 Issue 2, p304 

    Purpose: To determine the rankings of 6 input-output functions for understanding low-level, conversational, and high-level speech in multitalker babble without manipulating volume control for listeners with normal hearing, flat sensorineural hearing loss, and mildly sloping sensorineural hearing...

  • Subjective and Objective Effects of Fast and Slow Compression on the Perception of Reverberant Speech in Listeners With Hearing Loss. Lu-Feng Shi; Doherty, Karen A. // Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research;Oct2008, Vol. 51 Issue 5, p1328 

    Purpose: The purpose of the current study was to assess the effect of fast and slow attack/release times (ATs/RTs) on aided perception of reverberant speech in quiet. Method: Thirty listeners with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss were tested monaurally with a commercial hearing aid...

  • Prediction of Speech Recognition from Audibility in Older Listeners with Hearing Loss: Effects of Age, Amplification, and Background Noise. Souza, Pamela E.; Boike, Kumiko T.; Witherell, Kerry; Tremblay, Kelly // Journal of the American Academy of Audiology;Jan2007, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p54 

    The extent to which audibility determines speech recognition depends on a number of signal and listener factors. This study focused on three factors: age, background noise modulation, and linear versus wide-dynamic compression amplification. Three audiometrically matched groups of older...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics