TITLE

Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions

AUTHOR(S)
Schardt, Connie; Adams, Martha B; Owens, Thomas; Keitz, Sheri; Fontelo, Paul
PUB. DATE
January 2007
SOURCE
BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making;2007, Vol. 7 Issue 1, p16
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: Supporting 21st century health care and the practice of evidence-based medicine (EBM) requires ubiquitous access to clinical information and to knowledge-based resources to answer clinical questions. Many questions go unanswered, however, due to lack of skills in formulating questions, crafting effective search strategies, and accessing databases to identify best levels of evidence. Methods: This randomized trial was designed as a pilot study to measure the relevancy of search results using three different interfaces for the PubMed search system. Two of the search interfaces utilized a specific framework called PICO, which was designed to focus clinical questions and to prompt for publication type or type of question asked. The third interface was the standard PubMed interface readily available on the Web. Study subjects were recruited from interns and residents on an inpatient general medicine rotation at an academic medical center in the US. Thirty-one subjects were randomized to one of the three interfaces, given 3 clinical questions, and asked to search PubMed for a set of relevant articles that would provide an answer for each question. The success of the search results was determined by a precision score, which compared the number of relevant or gold standard articles retrieved in a result set to the total number of articles retrieved in that set. Results: Participants using the PICO templates (Protocol A or Protocol B) had higher precision score for each question than the participants who used Protocol C, the standard PubMed Web interface. (Question 1: A = 35%, B = 28%, C = 20%; Question 2: A = 5%, B = 6%, C = 4%; Question 3: A = 1%, B = 0%, C = 0%) 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the precision for each question using a lower boundary of zero. However, the 95% confidence limits were overlapping, suggesting no statistical difference between the groups. Conclusion: Due to the small number of searches for each arm, this pilot study could not demonstrate a statistically significant difference between the search protocols. However there was a trend towards higher precision that needs to be investigated in a larger study to determine if PICO can improve the relevancy of search results.
ACCESSION #
29404599

 

Related Articles

  • Real-time EBM: From Bed Board to Keyboard and Back. Stark, Rachel; Helenius, Ira M.; Schimming, Laura M.; Takahara, Nogusa; Kronish, Ian; Korenstein, Deborah // JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine;Dec2007, Vol. 22 Issue 12, p1656 

    BACKGROUND: To practice Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM), physicians must quickly retrieve evidence to inform medical decisions. Internal Medicine (IM) residents receive little formal education in electronic database searching, and have identified poor searching skills as a barrier to practicing...

  • KANITA DAYALI TIP NEDÄ°R? Suçın, Sevgi // Ekev Academic Review;Summer2006, Vol. 10 Issue 28, p319 

    Today, evidence-based practice, its concepts, methods and implementation is perhaps the most discussed development in both the medical and political world. It aims to optimize health care outcomes and benefit the patient by integrating the best external evidence, clinical expertise and patient...

  • An integrated strategy of knowledge application for optimal e-health implementation: A multi-method study protocol. Gagnon, Marie-Pierre; Légaré, France; Fortin, Jean-Paul; Lamothe, Lise; Labrecque, Michel; Duplantie, Julie // BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making;2008, Vol. 8 Issue 1, Special section p1 

    Background: E-health is increasingly valued for supporting: 1) access to quality health care services for all citizens; 2) information flow and exchange; 3) integrated health care services and 4) interprofessional collaboration. Nevertheless, several questions remain on the factors allowing an...

  • Cochrane Reviews: Four Proposals for Improvement. Currow, David C.; Higginson, Irene J. // Journal of Palliative Medicine;Nov2015, Vol. 18 Issue 11, p906 

    The article discusses the proposals of the Cochrane Collaboration to enhance health care in the U.S. Topics covered include the expansion of the collaboration in more than 100 countries. Also mentioned is the focus of the alliance on examining health policy priorities as well as determining...

  • Misunderstandings, misperceptions, and mistakes. Straus, Sharon; Haynes, Brian; Glasziou, Paul; Dickersin, Kay; Guyatt, Gordon // ACP Journal Club;Jan/Feb2007, Vol. 146 Issue 1, pA8 

    The article reports on the response of clinicians, researchers, and policymakers, on the discussion of evidence-based medicine (EBM). Bernadine Healy, former director of the U.S. National Institutes of Health, has pointed out several problems faced by practitioners and teachers of EBM. She...

  • Using Evidence-Based Principles to Make Clinical Decisions. Valente, Michael // Journal of the American Academy of Audiology;Nov/Dec2005, Vol. 16 Issue 10, p1 

    Introduces a series of articles on evidence-based principles in supporting clinical decision-making process.

  • Evidence-Based Urology: How Does a Randomized Clinical Trial Achieve Its Designed Goals? Bazargani, Homayoun Sadeghi; Hajebrahimi, Sakineh // Urology Journal;Apr2011, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p88 

    Purpose: To discuss the methodological considerations of a standard and applicable randomized clinical trial (RCT). Materials and Methods: Using a predefined strategy, we conducted systematic computerized search of the MIDLINE (1966 to 2011) and EMBASE (1980 to 2011) databases to identify all...

  • Health system context and implementation of evidence-based practices-development and validation of the Context Assessment for Community Health (COACH) tool for low- and middle-income settings. Bergström, Anna; Skeen, Sarah; Duc, Duong M.; Zelaya Blandon, Elmer; Estabrooks, Carole; Gustavsson, Petter; Phuong Hoa, Dinh Thi; Källestål, Carina; Målqvist, Mats; Nguyen Thu Nga; Persson, Lars-Åke; Pervin, Jesmin; Peterson, Stefan; Rahman, Anisur; Selling, Katarina; Squires, Janet E.; Tomlinson, Mark; Waiswa, Peter; Wallin, Lars; Blandon, Elmer Zelaya // Implementation Science;Aug2015, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p1 

    Background: The gap between what is known and what is practiced results in health service users not benefitting from advances in healthcare, and in unnecessary costs. A supportive context is considered a key element for successful implementation of evidence-based practices (EBP)....

  • Outcomes Assessment: Demonstrating Our Predictive Ability as a Healthcare Profession. McKeon, Patrick O.; Medina McKeon, Jennifer M. // International Journal of Athletic Therapy & Training;Jul2016, Vol. 21 Issue 4, p1 

    The author discusses outcomes assessment and proposes a new way to think about it as it relates to how the public is shown how good clinician is at what he does. He notes that documentation is an important process to secure professional body of knowledge and recognition from the public that...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics