TITLE

New Design Esophageal Stents for the Palliation of Dysphagia From Esophageal or Gastric Cardia Cancer: A Randomized Trial

AUTHOR(S)
Verschuur, Els M. L.; Repici, Alessandro; Kuipers, Ernst J.; Steyerberg, Ewout W.; Siersema, Peter D.
PUB. DATE
February 2008
SOURCE
American Journal of Gastroenterology;Feb2008, Vol. 103 Issue 2, p304
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIM: Stents are often used for the palliation of inoperable esophageal or gastric cardia cancer. One of the drawbacks of the currently used stents is the high percentage of recurrent dysphagia due to stent migration and tissue growth. New stents have been designed to overcome this unwanted sequela of stent placement. In the present study, we investigated whether results of stent placement could be improved with newer stent designs. METHODS: Between June 2004 and May 2006, 125 patients with dysphagia from inoperable carcinoma of the esophagus or gastric cardia were randomized to placement of an Ultraflex stent (N = 42), Polyflex stent (N = 41), or Niti-S stent (N = 42). Patients were followed by scheduled telephone calls at 14 days after treatment, and then monthly for 6 months or until death. Technical and functional outcome, complications, recurrent dysphagia, and survival were analyzed with, χ2 tests, Kaplan-Meier curves, and log-rank tests. RESULTS: Stent placement was technically successful in all patients with an Ultraflex stent, in 34/41 (83%) patients with a Polyflex stent, and in 40/42 (95%) patients treated with a Niti-S stent ( P= 0.008). Dysphagia score improved from a median of 3 (liquids only) to 1 (ability to eat some solid food) in all patients. There were no differences in complications among the three stent types. Recurrent dysphagia, caused by tissue in- or overgrowth, migration, or food obstruction, was significantly different between patients with an Ultraflex stent and patients with a Polyflex stent or Niti-S stent (22 [52%] vs 15 [37%] vs 13 [31%], P= 0.03). Stent migration occurred more frequently with Polyflex stents, whereas tissue in- or overgrowth was more frequently seen with Ultraflex stents, and to a lesser degree, Niti-S stents. No differences were found in survival (median survival: Ultraflex stent 132 days vs Polyflex stent 102 days vs Niti-S stent 159 days) among the three stent types. CONCLUSIONS: All three stents are safe and offer adequate palliation of dysphagia from esophageal or gastric cardia cancer. Nonetheless, Polyflex stents seem the least preferable in this patient group, as placement of this device is technically demanding and associated with a high rate of stent migrations.
ACCESSION #
29383682

 

Related Articles

  • Prospective evaluation of a new self-expanding plastic stent for inoperable esophageal strictures. Costamagna, G.; Shah, S.K.; Tringali, A.; Mutignani, M.; Perri, V.; Riccioni, M.E. // Surgical Endoscopy;Jun2003, Vol. 17 Issue 6, p891 

    Background: High stent cost is considered the major drawback of self-expanding metal stents for dysphagia palliation in patients with inoperable esophageal strictures. We report our experience with a self-expanding plastic (Polyflex) stent, the cost of which is half that of the metal stents....

  • Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy to Treat Upside-Down Stomach Before Stent Insertion in a Patient With Distal Esophageal Carcinoma. Criblez, Dominique H. // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Oct1998, Vol. 93 Issue 10, p1938 

    A 89-yr-old woman presenting with dysphagia due to an obstructing adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus was additionally diagnosed to have an upside-down stomach creating a sharp angulation at the esophagogastric junction. Gastric anatomy had to be restored before palliative stent insertion. As...

  • Partially versus fully covered self-expanding metal stents for benign and malignant esophageal conditions: a single center experience. Seven, Gulseren; Irani, Shayan; Ross, Andrew; Ian Gan, S.; Gluck, Michael; Low, Donald; Kozarek, Richard // Surgical Endoscopy;Jun2013, Vol. 27 Issue 6, p2185 

    Background: Fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMS), unlike partially covered SEMS (PCSEMS), have been used to treat benign as well as malignant conditions. We aimed to evaluate the outcome of PCSEMS and FCSEMS in patients with both benign and malignant esophageal diseases. Methods:...

  • Intraosteal collost implantation in experiment. Maiborodin, I. V.; E. A. Beregovoy; I. V. Kuznetsova; A .I. Shevela; Barannick, M. I.; V. I. Maiborodina // Surgery News / Novosti Hirurgii;2013, Vol. 21 Issue 6, p24 

    Objectives. To assess the experience of stents application, formulate the main indications and contraindications for the esophageal stenting, prove that the esophageal stenting with self-expandable metal stents is considered as the treatment of choice in incurable patients. Methods. Within the...

  • The use of self-expanding stents in esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer palliation: a meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis of outcomes. Sgourakis, George; Gockel, Ines; Radtke, Arnold; Dedemadi, Georgia; Goumas, Konstantinos; Mylona, Sofia; Lang, Hauke; Tsiamis, Achilleas; Karaliotas, Constantine // Digestive Diseases & Sciences;Nov2010, Vol. 55 Issue 11, p3018 

    Background: The objective of this study was to examine the impact of self-expanding stents versus locoregional treatment modalities in the setting of esophageal cancer palliation.Methods: The present meta-analysis pooled the effects of outcomes of 1,027 patients...

  • Fully covered Alimaxx esophageal metal stents in the endoscopic treatment of benign esophageal diseases. Senousy, Bahaa; Gupte, Anand; Draganov, Peter; Forsmark, Chris; Wagh, Mihir; Senousy, Bahaa E; Gupte, Anand R; Draganov, Peter V; Forsmark, Chris E; Wagh, Mihir S // Digestive Diseases & Sciences;Dec2010, Vol. 55 Issue 12, p3399 

    Background: Expandable esophageal stents are widely used for the palliation of dysphagia in patients with esophageal cancer and are also beginning to be used in patients with benign esophageal diseases such as refractory strictures and fistulas. There is concern regarding the...

  • Chapter 86: Endoscopic Palliation of Dysphagia: Stenting. Baron, Todd Huntley // Esophageal Cancer: Principles & Practice;2009, p725 

    Chapter 86 of the book "Esophageal Cancer: Principles and Practice," edited by Blair A. Jobe, Charles R. Thomas, and John G. Hunter is presented. It presents a review on the significance of stents for malignant dysphagia palliation. It notes that endoscopic treatment modalities for the...

  • What is the optimal management of dysphagia in metastatic esophageal cancer? Hanna, W. C.; Sudarshan, M.; Roberge, D.; David, M.; Waschke, K. A.; Mayrand, S.; Alcindor, T.; Ferri, L. E. // Current Oncology;Apr2012, Vol. 19 Issue 2, pe60 

    Background The palliation of dysphagia in metastatic esophageal cancer remains a challenge, and the optimal approach for this difficult clinical scenario is not clear. We therefore sought to define and determine the efficacy of various treatment options used at our institution for this...

  • Development of severe complications caused by stent placement followed by definitive radiation therapy for T4 esophageal cancer. Yakami, Masahiro; Mitsumori, Michihide; Sai, Heitetsu; Nagata, Yasushi; Hiraoka, Masahiro; Nishimura, Yasumasa // International Journal of Clinical Oncology;Dec2003, Vol. 8 Issue 6, p395 

    Esophageal stenting in previously irradiated patients is known to cause more severe complications than those in patients who were not irradiated. But there are few reports regarding the results of stent placement before radiation therapy. Three patients with stage T4 esophageal cancer with...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics