Improving health care quality for racial/ethnic minorities: a systematic review of the best evidence regarding provider and organization interventions

Beach, Mary Catherine; Gary, Tiffany L.; Price, Eboni G.; Robinson, Karen; Gozu, Aysegul; Palacio, Ana; Smarth, Carole; Jenckes, Mollie; Feuerstein, Carolyn; Bass, Eric B.; Powe, Neil R.; Cooper, Lisa A.
January 2006
BMC Public Health;2006, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p104
Academic Journal
Background: Despite awareness of inequities in health care quality, little is known about strategies that could improve the quality of healthcare for ethnic minority populations. We conducted a systematic literature review and analysis to synthesize the findings of controlled studies evaluating interventions targeted at health care providers to improve health care quality or reduce disparities in care for racial/ethnic minorities. Methods: We performed electronic and hand searches from 1980 through June 2003 to identify randomized controlled trials or concurrent controlled trials. Reviewers abstracted data from studies to determine study characteristics, results, and quality. We graded the strength of the evidence as excellent, good, fair or poor using predetermined criteria. The main outcome measures were evidence of effectiveness and cost of strategies to improve health care quality or reduce disparities in care for racial/ethnic minorities. Results: Twenty-seven studies met criteria for review. Almost all (n = 26) took place in the primary care setting, and most (n = 19) focused on improving provision of preventive services. Only two studies were designed specifically to meet the needs of racial/ethnic minority patients. All 10 studies that used a provider reminder system for provision of standardized services (mostly preventive) reported favorable outcomes. The following quality improvement strategies demonstrated favorable results but were used in a small number of studies: bypassing the physician to offer preventive services directly to patients (2 of 2 studies favorable), provider education alone (2 of 2 studies favorable), use of a structured questionnaire to assess adolescent health behaviors (1 of 1 study favorable), and use of remote simultaneous translation (1 of 1 study favorable). Interventions employing more than one main strategy were used in 9 studies with inconsistent results. There were limited data on the costs of these strategies, as only one study reported cost data. Conclusion: There are several promising strategies that may improve health care quality for racial/ethnic minorities, but a lack of studies specifically targeting disease areas and processes of care for which disparities have been previously documented. Further research and funding is needed to evaluate strategies designed to reduce disparities in health care quality for racial/ethnic minorities.


Related Articles

  • A pharmacy response to the Institute of Medicine's 2001 initiative on quality in health care. Knapp, Katherine K.; Ray, Max D. // American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy;12/15/2002, Vol. 59 Issue 24, p2443 

    Examines the U.S. Institute of Medicine's 2001 initiative on quality in health care from the perspective of the medication-use process and the roles of pharmacists in all practice settings. Recommendation that pharmacy initiate a broader dialogue among stakeholders in the medication-use...

  • Studies look at progress and gaps in U.S. health care quality.  // AHA News;4/18/2011, Vol. 47 Issue 8, p7 

    The article focuses on the Institute of Medicine report entitled "Crossing the Quality Chasm" which reveals the progress and gaps in the U.S. health care quality.

  • So close, yet so far away. Fong, Tony // Modern Healthcare;11/22/2004, Vol. 34 Issue 47, p8 

    Focuses on the actions taken by hospitals to improve patient safety in the U.S. in response to the report "To Err Is Human," released by the Institute of Medicine in 1999. Findings of the report; Adoption of quality measures endorsed by the National Quality Forum in hospitals according to a...

  • Rurals may lose in quality quest. Morrissey, John // Modern Healthcare;11/1/2004, Vol. 34 Issue 44, p4 

    Focuses on the report "Quality Through Collaboration: The Future of Rural Health," which re-examined the U.S. Institute of Medicine's (IOM) blueprint for improving healthcare quality. Ways presented in the blueprint in transforming the healthcare system; Difficulty being faced by physician...

  • IOM report on 100 initial priorities for research.  // American Nurse;Jul/Aug2009, Vol. 41 Issue 4, p11 

    The article reports on the 2009 release of a report on medical research which was issued by the U.S. Institute of Medicine. The report outlines recommendations for 100 health topics that the institute feels should get priority attention and funding from a new national research effort developed...

  • Following the 'Six Aims.'. Cermignano, Tina L. // Health Facilities Management;Feb2008, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p42 

    The article reports about the Six Aims in order to ensure health care quality, described in the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) report. IOM considers these Six Aims as safe, timely, effective, efficient, equitable, and patient-centered health care. Environmental services are the ones that are...

  • The Institute of Medicine’s Reports on Quality and Safety: Paradoxes and Tensions. Khushf, George; Raymond, James; Beaman Jr, Charles // HEC Forum;Mar2008, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p1 

    An essay is presented on the report on error and quality from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) in the U.S. It discusses the implications of the report from IOM and focuses on the areas of health care management, traditional and unconventional views of medical science and traditions of ethical...

  • Front-page news. Kaplan, Madge // Modern Healthcare;11/28/2005, Vol. 35 Issue 48, p22 

    The article reflects on the development of news media interest on stories about the quality of health care in the U.S. as of November 28, 2005. News editors are formerly more eager to tackle stories about product and service improvement than health care quality. "To Err Is Human: Building a...

  • Quality Assessment in Pancreatic Surgery: What Might Tomorrow Require? Kalish, Brian; Vollmer, Charles; Kent, Tara; Nealon, William; Tseng, Jennifer; Callery, Mark // Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery;Jan2013, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p86 

    Introduction: The Institute of Medicine (IOM) defines healthcare quality across six domains: safety, timeliness, effectiveness, patient centeredness, efficiency, and equitability. We asked experts in pancreatic surgery (PS) whether improved quality metrics are needed, and how they could align to...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics