Levels of second hand smoke in pubs and bars by deprivation and food-serving status: a cross-sectional study from North West England

Edwards, Richard; Hasselholdt, Christian P.; Hargreaves, Kim; Probert, Claire; Holford, Richard; Hart, Judy; Van Tongeren, Martie; Watson, Adrian F. R.
January 2006
BMC Public Health;2006, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p42
Academic Journal
Background: The UK government proposed introducing partial smokefree legislation for England with exemptions for pubs and bars that do not prepare and serve food. We set out to test the hypothesis that pubs from more deprived areas and non food-serving pubs have higher levels of particulate air pollution. Methods: We conducted a cross sectional study in four mainly urban areas of the North West of England. We recruited a stratified random sample of 64 pubs divided into four groups based on whether their local population was affluent or deprived (using a UK area based deprivation measure), and whether or not they served food. The timing of air quality monitoring stratified to ensure similar distribution of monitoring by day of the week and time of evening between groups. We used a portable air quality monitor to collect fine particle (PM2.5) levels over a minimum of 30 minutes in areas where smoking was allowed,, and calculated mean time-time weighted average PM2.5 levels. Results: Mean PM2.5 was 285.5 μg/m³ (95% CI 212.7 to 358.3). Mean levels in the four groups were: affluent food-serving pubs (n = 16) 188.1 μg/m³ (95%CI 128.1 to 248.1); affluent non food-serving (n = 16) 186.8 μg/m³ (95%CI 118.9 to 254.3); deprived food-serving (n = 17) 399.4 μg/m3 (95%CI 177.7 to 621.2); and deprived non food-serving (n = 15) 365.7 μg/m³ (195.6 to 535.7). Levels were higher in pubs in deprived communities: mean 383.6 μg/m³ (95% CI 249.2 to 518.0) vs 187.4 μg/m³ (144.8 to 229.9); geometric mean 245.2 μg/m³ vs 151.2 μg/m³ (p = 0.03). There was little difference in particulate levels between food and non food-serving pubs. Conclusion: This study adds to the evidence that the UK government's proposals for partial smokefree legislation in England would offer the least protection to the most heavily exposed group - bar workers and customers in non food-serving pubs in deprived areas. The results suggest these proposals would work against the UK government's stated aim to reduce health inequalities.


Related Articles

  • Smoking law's enforcement 'still cloudy.'. Miller, Valerie // Las Vegas Business Press (10712186);1/1/2007, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p1 

    The article reports on challenges in the enforcement of the Nevada Clean Indoor Air Act. Officials in the Southern Nevada Health District say they might require assistance from local municipalities in enforcing the antismoking law if businesses are found to be violating it. Customers will be...

  • Proceed slowly on smoking rules.  // Las Vegas Business Press (10712186);6/9/2008, Vol. 25 Issue 23, p24 

    The article commends the plan of the Nevada Division of Health to delay or drop the proposed smoking ban regulations in public places. It says that the creation of the regulations came after voters approved the Nevada Clean Indoor Act. It notes that the smoking ban has affected the casinos and...

  • Air Contamination Due to Smoking in German Restaurants, Bars, and Other Venues—Before and After the Implementation of a Partial Smoking Ban. Gleich, Florian; Mons, Ute; Pötschke-Langer, Martina // Nicotine & Tobacco Research;Nov2011, Vol. 13 Issue 11, p1155 

    Introduction: The present study examined the reduction in exposure to tobacco smoke in German hospitality venues following the implementation of a partial smoking ban by measuring the indoor air concentration of PM2.5 in 2005 and 2009, that is, before and after the legislation was implemented....

  • Officials to strengthen penalties for smoking ban. MILLER, VALERIE // Las Vegas Business Press (10712186);10/5/2009, Vol. 26 Issue 40, pP5 

    The article reports on the preparations being made by the Nevada State Division of Health to strengthen penalties for the ban on smoking in bars. Health authorities started writing a working draft of proposed regulations for the Southern Nevada Health District after the Nevada Supreme Court...

  • Decision upsets takeout eateries. Miller, Valerie // Las Vegas Business Press (10712186);11/12/2007, Vol. 24 Issue 46, p5 

    The article reports on the effect of the Nevada Clean Indoor Air Act on the business performance of pubs, take-out establishments, taverns and bars in the state. The Act states that take-out establishments can no longer deliver into bars that allow smoking. Initially, the ban meant a new market...

  • Designated smoking times raise ire of ban advocate. Miller, Valerie // Las Vegas Business Press (10712186);3/26/2007, Vol. 24 Issue 13, p2 

    The article reports on the reaction of the American Cancer Society to the decision of the Southern Nevada Health District to issue some bars and restaurants in the area special permits allowing for separate dining and smoking times. Buffy Martin-Tarbox, the government-relations director for the...

  • BOISE'S ANTI-SMOKING ORDINANCE CHANGES MORE THAN A FEW HABITS. Wolf, Carissa // Boise Weekly;3/14/2012, Vol. 20 Issue 38, p10 

    The article presents information related to the ban on smoking in bars, privateclubs and near transit areas in Boise, Idaho.

  • Pacers recovery well-timed: Last place, unacceptable.  // Indianapolis Business Journal;5/28/2012, Vol. 33 Issue 13, p10 

    The article reports that the bars of Indianapolis, Indiana, will become smoke-free on June 1, 2012, however, implementing such a law will be cutting-edge.

  • Local bars cope with the smoking ban. Garrison, Steve // UWM Post (Milwaukee, WI);1/31/2011, p1 

    The article reports that the issue of adoption of smoking ban in Milwaukee, Wisconsin is still being debated in bars across the state as the financial and social ramifications of the ban are unknown.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics