What makes people decide who to turn to when faced with a mental health problem? Results from a French survey

Kovess-Masféty, Viviane; Saragoussi, Delphine; Sevilla-Dedieu1, Christine; Gilbert, Fabien; Suchocka, Agnieszka; Arveiller, Nathalie; Gasquet, Isabelle; Younes, Nadia; Hardy-Bayle, Marie-Christine
January 2007
BMC Public Health;2007, Vol. 7, p188
Academic Journal
Background: The unequal use of mental health care is a great issue, even in countries with universal health coverage. Better knowledge of the factors that have an impact on the pathway to mental health care may be a great help for designing education campaigns and for best organizing health care delivery. The objective of this study is to explore the determinants of help-seeking intentions for mental health problems and which factors influence treatment opinions and the reliance on and compliance with health professionals' advice. Methods: 441 adults aged 18 to 70 were randomly selected from the general population of two suburban districts near Paris and agreed to participate in the study (response rate = 60.4%). The 412 respondents with no mental health problems based on the CIDI-SF and the CAGE, who had not consulted for a mental health problem in the previous year, were asked in detail about their intentions to seek help in case of a psychological disorder and about their opinion of mental health treatments. The links between the respondents' characteristics and intentions and opinions were explored. Results: More than half of the sample (57.8%) would see their general practitioner (GP) first and 46.6% would continue with their GP for follow-up. Mental health professionals were mentioned far less than GPs. People who would choose their GP first were older and less educated, whereas those who would favor mental health specialists had lower social support. For psychotherapy, respondents were split equally between seeing a GP, a psychiatrist or a psychologist. People were reluctant to take psychotropic drugs, but looked favorably on psychotherapy. Conclusion: GPs are often the point of entry into the mental health care system and need to be supported. Public information campaigns about mental health care options and treatments are needed to educate the public, eliminate the stigma of mental illness and eliminate prejudices.


Related Articles

  • Internalizing stigma associated with mental illness: findings from a general population survey in Jamaica. Gibson, Roger Carl; Abel, Wendel Dwight; White, Sharon; Hickling, Frederick William // Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica;Feb2010, Vol. 27 Issue 2, p26 

    Objectives. The culture of stigma associated with mental illness is particularly intense when persons who are normally victims of that stigmatization (mentally ill persons and their family members) themselves act negatively toward others whom they associate with mental illness. We attempt to...

  • The National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being in Australia: Impact on Policy. Henderson, Scott // Canadian Journal of Psychiatry;Nov2002, Vol. 47 Issue 9, p819 

    Objective: To provide a synopsis of the 3-part National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being in Australia and to examine the yield in terms of policy and other changes in mental and general health services. Method: Published data are examined, and a commentary is provided on service-delivery...

  • Mental health patients seen but not heard.  // Mental Health Occupational Therapy;Nov2009, Vol. 14 Issue 3, p134 

    The article notes that people with mental illnesses feel ignored, uninformed, and sometimes unsafe, based on a survey of mental health patients in Great Britain.

  • Patterns in mortality among people with severe mental disorders across birth cohorts: a register-based study of Denmark and Finland in 1982-2006. Gissler, Mika; Laursen, Thomas Munk; Ösby, Urban; Nordentoft, Merete; Wahlbeck, Kristian // BMC Public Health;2013, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p1 

    Background: Mortality among patients with mental disorders is higher than in general population. By using national longitudinal registers, we studied mortality changes and excess mortality across birth cohorts among people with severe mental disorders in Denmark and Finland. Methods: A cohort of...

  • Negative Attitudes Toward Help Seeking for Mental Illness in 2 Population-Based Surveys From the United States and Canada. Jagdeo, Amit; Cox, Brian J.; Stein, Murray B.; Sareen, Jitender // Canadian Journal of Psychiatry;Nov2009, Vol. 54 Issue 11, p757 

    Objectives: To determine the prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of negative attitudes toward help seeking for mental illness among the general population in the United States and Ontario. Methods: Two contemporaneous population-based surveys (aged 15 to 54 years) were analyzed: the US...

  • Largest Multi-National Mental Health Survey Shows Treatment of Mentally Ill Woefully Inadequate.  // Ascribe Newswire: Medicine;6/7/2004, p64 

    The largest multi-national mental health survey of its kind ever undertaken has found that the challenge of treating those most severely affected by mental disorders is largely unmet. The level of impairment we found to be associated with serious mental disorders was staggering, said Ronald...

  • By the Numbers: Vets and Mental Illness.  // Counseling Today;Dec2007, Vol. 50 Issue 6, p3 

    The article presents a survey which assesses the mental health of U.S. veterans, according to the National Alliance on Mental Illness. It is noted that almost one-third of veterans returning from Afghanistan and Iraq face mental health problems. In 2006, the suicide rate in the Army reached its...

  • Evaluating cutpoints for the MHI-5 and MCS using the GHQ-12: a comparison of five different methods. Kelly, Mark J.; Dunstan, Frank D.; Lloyd, Keith; Fone, David L. // BMC Psychiatry;2008, Vol. 8, Special section p1 

    Background: The Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5) and the Mental Health Component Summary score (MCS) derived from the Short Form 36 (SF-36) instrument are well validated and reliable scales. A drawback of their construction is that neither has a clinically validated cutpoint to define a case of...

  • APPLEBY WAS SO WRONG. Sheldon, Kay // Community Care;10/15/2009, Issue 1791, p10 

    The article offers the author's opinion on the criticism of the Great Britain Care Quality Commission's survey of service users by Mike Appleby, national mental health director. He says that the assertion of Appleby that limited credence should be given to the views of service users who have...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics