National smokefree law in New Zealand improves air quality inside bars, pubs and restaurants

Wilson, Nick; Edwards, Richard; Maher, Anthony; Näthe, Jenny; Jalali, Rafed
January 2007
BMC Public Health;2007, Vol. 7 Issue 1, p85
Academic Journal
Background: We aimed to: (i) assess compliance with a new smokefree law in a range of hospitality settings; and (ii) to assess the impact of the new law by measuring air quality and making comparisons with air quality in outdoor smoking areas and with international data from hospitality settings. Methods: We included 34 pubs, restaurants and bars, 10 transportation settings, nine other indoor settings, six outdoor smoking areas of bars and restaurants, and six other outdoor settings. These were selected using a mix of random, convenience and purposeful sampling. The number of lit cigarettes among occupants at defined time points in each venue was observed and a portable real-time aerosol monitor was used to measure fine particulate levels (PM2.5). Results: No smoking was observed during the data collection periods among over 3785 people present in the indoor venues, nor in any of the transportation settings. The levels of fine particulates were relatively low inside the bars, pubs and restaurants in the urban and rural settings (mean 30-minute level = 16 μg/m³ for 34 venues; range of mean levels for each category: 13 μg/m³ to 22 μg/m³). The results for other smokefree indoor settings (shops, offices etc) and for smokefree transportation settings (eg, buses, trains, etc) were even lower. However, some "outdoor" smoking areas attached to bars/restaurants had high levels of fine particulates, especially those that were partly enclosed (eg, up to a 30-minute mean value of 182 μg/m³ and a peak of maximum value of 284 μg/m³). The latter are far above WHO guideline levels for 24-hour exposure (ie, 25μg/m³). Conclusion: There was very high compliance with the new national smokefree law and this was also reflected by the relatively good indoor air quality in hospitality settings (compared to the "outdoor" smoking areas and the comparable settings in countries that permit indoor smoking). Nevertheless, adopting enhanced regulations (as used in various US and Canadian jurisdictions) may be needed to address hazardous air quality in relatively enclosed "outdoor" smoking areas.


Related Articles

  • Even Louisiana has a limited smoking ban. Ferguson, Margaret // Indianapolis Business Journal;12/26/2011, Vol. 32 Issue 44, p7B 

    The article offers the author's insights on the smoking bans in most workplaces and all restaurants, exempts in bars and gambling facilities in Louisiana. The author says that the "Let's be Totally Clear" campaign was launched by non-smoking advocates, arguing the same protection in bars and...

  • Smoke-free workplace initiatives firing up. Davis, Andrea Muirragui // Indianapolis Business Journal;1/6/2003, Vol. 23 Issue 44, p17A 

    Reports on an increase in public smoking restrictions in cities across the United states. Goal of protecting employees from secondhand smoke; Anti-smoking bill to be introduced in Indianapolis, Indiana in 2003; Reasons why workplace smoking bans are of particular interest to restaurant...

  • Making public housing in US smoke-free predicted to save lives. Wahowiak, Lindsey // Nation's Health;Mar2016, Vol. 46 Issue 2, p1 

    The article reports on the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's proposed rule that would eliminate smoking in public housing in 2016. Topics discussed include an overview of the smoke-free public housing proposal, the prohibition of lit tobacco products in indoor common areas,...

  • State Restaurant Association Won't Support Smoking Ban. Czurak, David // Grand Rapids Business Journal;06/05/2000, Vol. 18 Issue 23, p7 

    Reports on the Michigan Restaurant Association's (MRA) opposition to a bill that would require all state businesses with a food license to be smoke-free. Number of smoke-free restaurants in the state; Accommodation of smokers and non-smokers through proper ventilation; Bill's goal of reducing...

  • Italy's smoking ban has led to an 8% drop in tobacco consumption. Dobson, Roger // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);11/19/2005, Vol. 331 Issue 7526, p1159 

    The article reports that Italy's smoking ban in public places has led to an eight percent drop in cigarette consumption. A study that was published online in the "Annals of Oncology" suggests that anti-smoking legislation will have a major impact on public health. The decline in cigarette...

  • Secondhand smoke and particulate matter exposure in the home. Van Deusen, Amy; Hyland, Andrew; Travers, Mark J.; Chong Wang; Higbee, Cheryl; King, Brian A.; Alford, Terry; Cummings, K. Michael // Nicotine & Tobacco Research;Jun2009, Vol. 11 Issue 6, p635 

    With the increasing normative trend of clean indoor air laws prohibiting smoking in public places such as worksites and restaurants, the home is becoming the primary source of secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure. However, little empirical data indicate how SHS is distributed throughout homes and...

  • Longitudinal evaluation of smoke-free Scotland on pub and home drinking behavior: Findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project. McKee, Sherry A.; Higbee, Cheryl; O'Malley, Stephanie; Hassan, Louise; Borland, Ron; Cummings, K. Michael; Hastings, Gerard; Fong, Geoffrey T.; Hyland, Andrew // Nicotine & Tobacco Research;Jun2009, Vol. 11 Issue 6, p619 

    Introduction: On 26 March 2006, Scotland implemented a smoke-free policy prohibiting smoking in indoor public venues, including bars and pubs. Drinking and smoking are highly associated behaviors, so we evaluated whether the regulations would decrease drinking behavior among smokers in public...

  • New law endangers stereotypes but won't snuff out bar business. Savage, Bill // Crain's Chicago Business;1/7/2008, Vol. 31 Issue 1, p9 

    The author reflects on the statewide ban of smoking in public places in Illinois. The author asserts that the city has banned smoking in places like restaurants and bar businesses in spite of the claim that the ban is a form of nanny-state moral policing. Moreover, he contends that the smoking...

  • Economic effect of a smoke-free law in a tobacco-growing community. Pyles, Mark K.; Mullineaux, Donald J.; Okoli, Chizimuzo T. C.; Hahn, Ellen J. // Tobacco Control;Feb2007, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p66 

    Objective: To determine whether Lexington, Kentucky's smoke-free law affected employment and business closures in restaurants and bars. On 27 April 2004, Lexington-Fayette County implemented a comprehensive ordinance prohibiting smoking in all public buildings, including bars and restaurants....


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics