Differing mental health practice among general practitioners, private psychiatrists and public psychiatrists

Younès, N.; Hardy-Bayle, M. C.; Falissard, B.; Kovess, V.; Chaillet, M. P.; Gasquet, I.
January 2005
BMC Public Health;2005, Vol. 5 Issue 1, p104
Academic Journal
Background: Providing care for mental health problems concerns General Practitioners (GPs), Private Psychiatrists (PrPs) and Public Psychiatrists (PuPs). As patient distribution and patterns of practice among these professionals are not well known, a survey was planned prior to a re-organisation of mental health services in an area close to Paris Methods: All GPs (n = 492), PrPs (n = 82) and PuPs (n = 78) in the South-Yvelines area in France were informed of the implementation of a local mental health program. Practitioners interested in taking part were invited to include prospectively all patients with mental health problem they saw over an 8-day period and to complete a 6-month retrospective questionnaire on their mental health practice. 180 GPs (36.6%), 45 PrPs (54.9%) and 63 PuPs (84.0%) responded. Results: GPs and PrPs were very similar but very different from PuPs for the proportion of patients with anxious or depressive disorders (70% v. 65% v. 38%, p < .001), psychotic disorders (5% v. 7% v. 30%, p < .001), previous psychiatric hospitalization (22% v. 26 v. 61%, p < .001) and receiving disability allowance (16% v. 18% v. 52%, p < .001). GPs had fewer patients with long-standing psychiatric disorders than PrPs and PuPs (52%, 64% v. 63%, p < .001). Time-lapse between consultations was longest for GPs, intermediate for PuPs and shortest for PrPs (36 days v. 26 v. 18, p < .001). Access to care had been delayed longer for Psychiatrists (PrPs, PuPs) than for GPs (61% v. 53% v. 25%, p < .001). GPs and PuPs frequently felt a need for collaboration for their patients, PrPs rarely (42% v. 61%. v. 10%, p < .001). Satisfaction with mental health practice was low for all categories of physicians (42.6% encountered difficulties hospitalizing patients and 61.4% had patients they would prefer not to cater for). GPs more often reported unsatisfactory relationships with mental health professionals than did PrPs and PuPs (54% v. 15% v. 8%, p < .001). Conclusion: GP patients with mental health problems are very similar to patients of private psychiatrists; there is a lack of the collaboration felt to be necessary, because of psychiatrists' workload, and because GPs have specific needs in this respect. The "Yvelines-Sud Mental Health Network" has been created to enhance collaboration.


Related Articles

  • Living with accelerating speed of change. Rae-Grant, Quentin; Rae-Grant, Q // Canadian Journal of Psychiatry;Feb1997, Vol. 42 Issue 1, p17 

    The author reflects on the fast-paced changes in the practice of psychiatry. He noted that these changes will eventually characterize the practice of psychiatry and mental health especially in the funding patterns which directly affects teaching, research and practice problems. He also believes...

  • Italian psychiatry. Rizzoli, Antonio A.; Rizzoli, A A // British Journal of Psychiatry;Aug87, Vol. 151, p276 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to an article about Italian psychiatry.

  • Using Clinical and Criminal Involvement Factors to Explain Homelessness Among Clients of a Psychiatric Probation and Parole Service. Solomon, Phyllis; Draine, Jeffrey // Psychiatric Quarterly;Mar1999, Vol. 70 Issue 1, p75 

    This study sought to examine the rate of homelessness and the extent to which lifetime homelessness was associated with clinical factors, such as diagnosis and treatment history; or criminal factors, such as criminal behavior and arrest history, among psychiatric probationers and parolees....

  • Volume 70. Rachlin, Stephen // Psychiatric Quarterly;Mar1999, Vol. 70 Issue 1, p1 

    Presents an introduction to articles in the March 1999 issue of the periodical "Psychiatric Quarterly." Effect of race on mental diagnosis; Diagnostic categories in use.

  • Emerging Issues in Forensic Mental Health. Petrila, John // Psychiatric Quarterly;Mar2004, Vol. 75 Issue 1, p3 

    Forensic mental health traditionally was considered the backwater of forensic practice. However, because of advances in knowledge regarding the core issues of capacity and risk, and because of changes in the location of forensic assessment and treatment, “forensic” issues now...

  • Mental health in the north west region of England: associations with deprivation. Harrison, J.; Barrow, S.; Creed, F. // Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology;1998, Vol. 33 Issue 3, p124 

    Minor psychiatric morbidity is known to be associated with social disadvantage, but few studies have explored this association at the population level. This study reports data from a postal survey across 19 health districts in one region, with a total sample of 38,000 respondents. The percentage...

  • Theoretical frameworks for understanding and investigating the therapeutic relationship in psychiatry. McGuire, R.; McCabe, R.; Priebe, S. // Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology;2001, Vol. 36 Issue 11, p557 

    Background: Mental health care is delivered through a relationship between a clinician and a patient. Although this therapeutic relationship is of central importance for mental health care, it appears to be relatively neglected in psychiatric research. Empirical research has for the most part...

  • Mental Health Care in the Canton of Geneva. Guimón, José // International Journal of Mental Health;Winter2002, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p15 

    Focuses on mental health care services in Geneva, Switzerland. Phases of evolution of these mental health services; Shortage of beds due to increase in hospitalizations; Evolution of psychiatric practice; Details of cost-containment policy in Geneva; Role of sectorization in continuing care...

  • Use of holding, restraints, seclusion and time-out in child and adolescent psychiatric in-patient treatment. Sourander, A.; Ellilä, H.; Välimäki, M.; Piha, J. // European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry;2002, Vol. 11 Issue 4, p162 

    The aim of the study was to analyse the use of holding, restraints, seclusion and time-out in child and adolescent psychiatric in-patient treatment in Finland. The study included 504 child and adolescent psychiatric in-patients in the year 2000. Time-out had been used for 28 %, holding for 26 %,...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics