TITLE

Variations in chemoprophylaxis for meningococcal disease: a retrospective case note review, analysis of routine prescribing data and questionnaire of general practitioners

AUTHOR(S)
Marks, Peter J.; Neal, Keith R.
PUB. DATE
January 2001
SOURCE
BMC Public Health;2001, Vol. 1, p16
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: Invasive meningococcal disease is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity in the UK. Administration of chemoprophylaxis to close contacts reduces the risk of a secondary case. However, unnecessary chemoprophylaxis may be associated with adverse reactions, increased antibiotic resistance and removal of organisms, such as Neisseria lactamica, which help to protect against meningococcal disease. Limited evidence exists to suggest that overuse of chemoprophylaxis may occur. This study aimed to evaluate prescribing of chemoprophylaxis for contacts of meningococcal disease by general practitioners and hospital staff. Methods: Retrospective case note review of cases of meningococcal disease was conducted in one health district from 1st September 1997 to 31st August 1999. Routine hospital and general practitioner prescribing data was searched for chemoprophylactic prescriptions of rifampicin and ciprofloxacin. A questionnaire of general practitioners was undertaken to obtain more detailed information. Results: Prescribing by hospital doctors was in line with recommendations by the Consultant for Communicable Disease Control. General practitioners prescribed 118% more chemoprophylaxis than was recommended. Size of practice and training status did not affect the level of additional prescribing, but there were significant differences by geographical area. The highest levels of prescribing occurred in areas with high disease rates and associated publicity. However, some true close contacts did not appear to receive prophylaxis. Conclusions: Receipt of chemoprophylaxis is affected by a series of patient, doctor and community interactions. High publicity appears to increase demand for prophylaxis. Some true contacts do not receive appropriate chemoprophylaxis and are left at an unnecessarily increased risk.
ACCESSION #
29336456

 

Related Articles

  • New 28-day repeat script plan 'crazy'  // Pulse;3/3/2003, Vol. 63 Issue 9, p21 

    Reports that the General Practitioners Committee (GPC) has condemned as 'crazy' attempts by primary care trusts (PCT) to impose blanket 28-day repeat prescribing intervals on general practitioners (GP) in Great Britain. Pharmacists' claim that having standardized prescribing intervals cuts drug...

  • Practices face cash penalty for altering script intervals. Finch, Rob // Pulse;6/16/2003, Vol. 63 Issue 24, p21 

    Reports that general practitioners (GP) face cash penalty for altering prescribing intervals at the end of the financial year to meet their drug budgets in Great Britain. Use of electronic prescribing analysis and costing data; Possibility of primary care trusts' use of fiscal measures to...

  • MPs want action on risky scripts.  // Pulse;6/30/2003, Vol. 63 Issue 26, p8 

    Reports on the warning about risky drug prescribing issued by the government to general practitioners in Great Britain.

  • Scots GPs could save �14m extra on drugs.  // Pulse;6/30/2003, Vol. 63 Issue 26, p8 

    Reports on the improvement in the quality of drug prescribing by general practitioners in Scotland.

  • GPs ignore warnings in BNF on asthma.  // Pulse;5/24/2004, Vol. 64 Issue 21, p16 

    Reports on the observation on the move of general practitioners to prescribe off-license drugs to treat asthma against specific advice from BNF in Great Britain.

  • Unbalanced presentation of facts breaks UK drug adverts code. Mayor, Susan // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);09/18/99, Vol. 319 Issue 7212, p727 

    Discusses issues on the prescription of medicines in Great Britain. Basis of most of the cases heard by the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority; Details on the complaint of a general practitioner against a pharmaceutical company.

  • PCOs scrap prescribing incentive schemes. Anekwe, Lilian // Pulse;4/6/2011, Vol. 71 Issue 12, p8 

    The article reports on the disposal of prescribing incentive schemes in England in response to changes to the new general practitioners (GP) contract.

  • Superstatin threat to GP budgets.  // Pulse;11/11/2002, Vol. 62 Issue 43, p7 

    Focuses on the impact of superstatins prescription on general practitioners budgets. Cost of prescribing the drug; Importance of the drug for treating coronary heart disease; Efficacy in lowering cholesterol levels.

  • Maximising your income from Zoladex. Silver, Lisa // GP: General Practitioner;6/3/2002, p41 

    Presents ways in which a physician can profit in prescribing and dispensing the drug Zoladex in Great Britain. Need for the prescription to be sent to the Prescription Pricing Authority; Method of administering the drug; Method of identifying the parallel-imported version.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics