TITLE

Pleasure in decision-making situations

AUTHOR(S)
Cabanac, Michel; Guillaume, Jacqueline; Balasko, Marta; Fleury, Adriana
PUB. DATE
January 2002
SOURCE
BMC Psychiatry;2002, Vol. 2, p7
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: This study explores the role of pleasure in decision making. Results: In Experiment 1, 12 subjects were presented with a questionnaire containing 46 items taken from the literature. Twenty-three items described a situation where a decision should be made and ended with a suggested solution. The other items served as filler items. The subjects were requested not to make a decision but to rate the pleasure or displeasure they experienced when reading the situation described in the item. The subjects' ratings were then compared to the decisions on the same situations made by the other subjects of the studies published by other workers. The ratings of pleasure/displeasure given by our subjects correlated significantly with the choices published by other authors. This result satisfies a necessary condition for pleasure to be the key of the decision making process in theoretical situations. In Experiment 2, a new group of 12 subjects rated their experience of pleasure/displeasure when reading various versions of 50 situations taken from daily life where an ethical decision had to be made (Questionnaire I) including 200 items. This was followed by a multiple-choice test with the 50 situations (Questionnaire II) using the same 200 items and offering the various behaviors. Subjects tended to choose ethical and unethical responses corresponding to their highest pleasure rating within each problem. In all cases the subjects' behavior was higher than chance level, and thus, followed the trend to maximize pleasure. In Experiment 3, 12 subjects reading 50 mathematical short problems followed by correct and incorrect versions of the answer to the problem (Questionnaire III), including 200 items. This was followed by a multiple-choice mathematical test with the 50 problems (Questionnaire IV) using the same 200 items and offering the correct and incorrect answers. In questionnaire IV, subjects tended to choose correct as well as incorrect responses corresponding to their highest hedonic rating within each problem. In all cases the subjects' behavior was higher than chance level, and thus, followed the trend to maximize pleasure. Conclusions: The results of the three experiments support the hypothesis according to which decisions are made in the hedonic dimension of conscious experience.
ACCESSION #
29323616

 

Related Articles

  • COMING TO A DECISION.  // Facts For You;May2014, p45 

    The article reports on the need for individuals to make decisions and its impact on their daily living. It explores the multiple choices available to people everyday and the better and worse decisions associated to each option. It also provides advice on how to deal with a variety of choices and...

  • ANALYSIS OF MEDICAL CONSUMER BEHAVIOR. Mazis, Michael B. // Advances in Consumer Research;1984, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p235 

    The three papers disussed below used sophisticated rnethodological approaches and advanced analytical techniques to assess consumer decision making. One paper reports that FDA is able to assess physicians' perception of advertising through an experimental research procedure. A second paper...

  • Policy Analytic Implications for a Theory of Prediction and Decision. Bunn, D. W. // Policy Sciences;Jun1977, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p125 

    Decision theory developed to prescribe the consistent choice behavior under uncertainty of an ideal individual. The policy analysis context of organizational decision-making, however, necessitates certain modifications to the fundamental decision theory in order to deal with the problems of...

  • Optimal Conflict in Preference Assessment. Delquié, Philippe // Management Science;Jan2003, Vol. 49 Issue 1, p102 

    Conflict arises in decision making when the choice alternatives present strong advantages and disadvantages over one another, that is, when the trade-offs involved are large. Conflict affects human response to choice, in particular, it increases decision difficulty and response unreliability. On...

  • CONSUMER DECISION MAKING ACROSS FAMILY LIFE CYCLE STAGES. Reilly, Karen S.; Eroglu, Sevign A.; Macheit, Karen A.; Omura, Glenn S. // Advances in Consumer Research;1984, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p400 

    This study examines the differentiation of the modernized family life cycle in the context of the consumer decision-making process. The results failed to support the hypotheses that the stages of the family life cycle could be differentiated with decision-making process variables.

  • AN APPROACH TO ESTIMATING LOGIT MODELS OF A SINGLE DECISION MAKER'S CHOICE BEHAVIOR. Chapman, Randall G. // Advances in Consumer Research;1984, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p656 

    This paper describes an approach to estimating multinomial logit models of a single decision maker's choice behavior. This approach is based on a recently developed "explosion" (decomposition) procedure for logit models. This approach uses the same data routinely generated for conjoint analysis...

  • A CONSIDERATION OF VERBAL AND INTERACTIVE PROTOCOL METHODOLOGIES IN CONSUMER INFORMATION PROCESSING RESEARCH. Rudd, Joel // Advances in Consumer Research;1984, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p361 

    This paper discusses verbal and interactive protocol methods in the study of consumer information processing and decision making. Unlike verbal protocols, which are recorded from individual consumers, interactive protocols are recorded from two or more consumers engaging in decision making...

  • DOES THE EMPEROR RIDE AGAIN? Cohen, Joel B. // Advances in Consumer Research;1984, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p367 

    The article focuses on papers that deal with the problems and limitations of verbal protocols on information processing and decision making. Interactive protocols are best suited to studying different phenomena and a set of limitations are added to interpersonal influences on individual...

  • The Decision Competence Paradox. Connolly, Terry // Academy of Management Proceedings (00650668);1980, p126 

    A paradox is found In the contrast of known human cognitive limitations and their apparent success in complex decision tasks. Several possible resolutions of the paradox are proposed, including misperception and misattribution of decisional success. A more general explanation, centered on the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics