Crystal structure of LIR-2 (ILT4) at 1.8 Ã…: differences from LIR-1 (ILT2) in regions implicated in the binding of the Human Cytomegalovirus class I MHC homolog UL18

Willcox, Benjamin E.; Thomas, Leonard M.; Chapman, Tara L.; Heikema, Astrid P.; West Jr., Anthony P.; Bjorkman, Pamela J.
January 2002
BMC Structural Biology;2002, Vol. 2, p6
Academic Journal
Background: Leukocyte Immunoglobulin-like Receptor-1 (LIR-1) and LIR-2 (also known as ILT2 and ILT4 respectively) are highly related cell surface receptors that bind a broad range of class I MHC molecules with low (µM) affinities. Expressed on monocytic cells and macrophages, both molecules transmit inhibitory signals after binding ligands. In addition to binding host class I MHC, the LIR-1 molecule, which is also expressed on lymphoid tissues, binds with a high (nM) affinity to UL18, a class I MHC homolog encoded by Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV). In comparison, LIR-2 binds UL18 only weakly (µM KD). To understand how HCMV preferentially targets the more broadly expressed LIR-1 molecule, we determined the crystal structure of a ligand-binding fragment of LIR-2, and compared this to the existing high-resolution crystal structure of LIR-1. Results: Recombinant LIR-2 (domains 1 and 2) was produced in E. coli and crystallized using streak seeding to optimize the crystal morphology. A data set complete to 1.8 Å was collected at 100 K from a single crystal in the P41212 spacegroup. The structure was solved by molecular replacement, using a search model based on the LIR-1 structure. Conclusions: The overall structure of LIR-2 D1D2 resembles both LIR-1, and Killer Inhibitory Receptors, in that the A strand in each domain forms hydrogen bonds to both β sheets, and there is a sharp angle between the two immunoglobulin-like domains. However, differences from LIR-1 are observed in each domain, with two key changes apparent in the ligand-binding domain, D1. The region corresponding to the residue 44-57 helix of LIR-1 adopts a topology distinct from that of both LIR-1 and the KIR structures, involving a shortened 310 helix. Secondly, the predicted UL18 binding region of LIR-1 is altered substantially in LIR-2: the 76-84 loop mainchain is displaced 11 Å with respect to LIR-1, and Tyrosine 38 adopts an alternative rotamer conformation. In summary, the structure of LIR-2 has revealed significant differences to LIR-1, including ones that may help to explain the >1000-fold lower affinity of LIR-2 for UL18.


Related Articles

  • The PickPocket method for predicting binding specificities for receptors based on receptor pocket similarities: application to MHC-peptide binding. Hao Zhang; Ole Lund; Morten Nielsen // Bioinformatics;May2009, Vol. 25 Issue 10, p1293 

    Motivation: Receptor–ligand interactions play an important role in controlling many biological systems. One prominent example is the binding of peptides to the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules controlling the onset of cellular immune responses. Thousands of MHC allelic...

  • The CDR3 regions of an immunodominant T cell receptor dictate the 'energetic landscape' of peptide-MHC recognition. Borg, Natalie A; Ely, Lauren K; Beddoe, Travis; Macdonald, Whitney A; Reid, Hugh H; Clements, Craig S; Purcell, Anthony W; Kjer-Nielsen, Lars; Miles, John J; Burrows, Scott R; McCluskey, James; Rossjohn, Jamie // Nature Immunology;Feb2005, Vol. 6 Issue 2, p171 

    The energetic bases of T cell recognition are unclear. Here, we studied the 'energetic landscape' of peptide-major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) recognition by an immunodominantaßT cell receptor (TCR). We quantified and evaluated the effect of natural and systematic substitutions in the...

  • Conformational Transitions upon Ligand Binding: Holo-Structure Prediction from Apo Conformations. Seeliger, Daniel; de Groot, Bert L. // PLoS Computational Biology;Jan2010, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p1 

    Biological function of proteins is frequently associated with the formation of complexes with small-molecule ligands. Experimental structure determination of such complexes at atomic resolution, however, can be time-consuming and costly. Computational methods for structure prediction of...

  • Viral decoy vetoes killer cell. Karre, Klas; Welsh, Raymond M. // Nature;4/3/1997, Vol. 386 Issue 6624, p446 

    Provides background and analysis of two papers which provide evidence that cytomegaloviruses (CMV) use a decoy strategy to interfere with expression of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). The demonstration that products of homologous genes in murine and human CMV protect virus-infected...

  • Tetraspan microdomains distinct from lipid rafts enrich select peptide?MHC class II complexes. Kropshofer, H.; Spindeldreher, S.; Röhn, T. A.; Platania, N.; Grygar, C.; Daniel, N.; Wölpl, A.; Langen, H.; Horejsi, V.; Vogt, A. B. // Nature Immunology;Jan2002, Vol. 3 Issue 1, p61 

    Complexes of peptide and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II are expressed on the surface of antigen-presenting cells but their molecular organization is unknown. Here we show that subsets of MHC class II molecules localize to membrane microdomains together with tetraspan proteins,...

  • TCRs with high affinity for foreign pMHC show self-reactivity. Holler, Phillip D.; Chlewicki, Lukasz K.; Kranz, David M. // Nature Immunology;Jan2003, Vol. 4 Issue 1, p55 

    T cells with high-affinity T cell receptors (TCRs) for a foreign peptide–major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) appear to be negatively selected, even though they have never seen the foreign antigen. To examine how this process operates, we used in vitro yeast display to isolate...

  • Crystal structure of a T cell receptor bound to an allogeneic MHC molecule. Reiser, Jean-Baptiste; Darnault, Claudine; Guimezanes, Annick; Grégoire, Claude; Mosser, Thomas; Schmitt-Verhulst, Anne-Marie; Fontecilla-Camps, Juan Carlos; Malissen, Bernard; Housset, Dominique; Mazza, Gilbert // Nature Immunology;Oct2000, Vol. 1 Issue 4, p291 

    Many T cell receptors (TCRs) that are selected to respond to foreign peptide antigens bound to self major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules are also reactive with allelic variants of self-MHC molecules. This property, termed alloreactivity, causes graft rejection and graft-versus-host...

  • Incompatible differences: view of an allogeneic pMHC-TCR complex. Kranz, David M. // Nature Immunology;Oct2000, Vol. 1 Issue 4, p277 

    Examines the first crystal structure of an allo-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) complexed with peptide and T cell receptor and its relation to how T cells recognize allogenic MHC molecules. Indistinguishability of alloreactions to the typical T cell recognition complex of a T cell...

  • Structural basis for a major histocompatibility complex class Ib—restricted T cell response. Hoare, Hilary L.; Sullivan, Lucy C.; Pietra, Gabriella; Clements, Craig S.; Lee, Eleanor J.; Ely, Lauren K.; Beddoe, Travis; Falco, Michela; Kjer-Nielsen, Lars; Reid, Hugh H.; McCluskey, James; Moretta, Lorenzo; Rossjohn, Jamie; Brooks, Andrew G. // Nature Immunology;Mar2006, Vol. 7 Issue 3, p256 

    In contrast to antigen-specific immunity orchestrated by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class Ia molecules, the ancestrally related nonclassical MHC class Ib molecules generally mediate innate immune responses. Here we have demonstrated the structural basis by which the MHC class Ib...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics