Center for Biological Diversity v. Hamilton: Eviscerating the Citizen Suit Provision of the Endangered Species Act?
- The Supreme Court of the United States. // Congressional Digest;Oct26, Vol. 5 Issue 10, p282
The article presents brief non-technical review of current decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court which are of general public interest. The Supreme Court of the U.S. convened in annual session on October 4, 1926 and this term of the court will continue until June 1927. The 36 weeks of the annual...
- SAVING WILDLIFE & WILD PLACES. // National Wildlife (World Edition);Feb/Mar2004, Vol. 42 Issue 2, p66
Provides an update on wildlife conservation as of February 2004. Information on the eagle hacking program of the National Wildlife Federation (NWF); Causes of the depletion of orca population at Prince William Sound; Lawsuit filed by the NWF against the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
- Arizona Cattle Growers Association v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service: Has the Ninth Circuit Weakened the "Take" Provisions of the Endangered Species Act? Stinson, Paul // Ecology Law Quarterly;2003, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p497
Examines the implications of the court's decision to invalidate the incidental take statements (ITS) issued by the service in the case, Arizona Cattle Growers Association v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Definition of incidental take under the U.S. Endangered Species Act; Background on the...
- Biodiversity Legal Foundation v. Badgley: Good News for Endangered Species Act Advocates, Bad News for At-Risk Species. Schlotterbeck, Jennifer // Ecology Law Quarterly;2003, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p593
Examines the implications of the court's decision on the case, Biodiversity Legal Foundation v. Badgley, for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Background on the U.S. Endangered Species Act; Facts of the case; Practical implications of the case.
- Lawyer fees cause judge to wait on Netflix settlement. Liedtke, Michael // Buffalo Law Journal;3/30/2006, Vol. 78 Issue 26, p4
Presents information on a ruling issued by San Francisco Superior Court Judge Thomas Mellon Jr. regarding a proposed class action settlement against online service company Netflix Inc. on March 22, 2006. Reason behind the class action lawsuit; Decision of Mellon with regards to the fees to be...
- THE TIMING OF CHALLENGES TO COMPEL CRITICAL HABITAT DESIGNATION UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT: SHOULD COURTS TOLL THE GENERAL FEDERAL STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS? Crawford, Matthew D. // Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review;2009, Vol. 36 Issue 2, p497
The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Fish and Wild-life Service, is directed by the Endangered Species Act to designate critical habitat concurrently with the listing of a species as endangered or threatened. However, the ESA allows FWS to delay critical habitat designation upon a...
- Fish and wildlife service just says no. Hall, Carroll // Outdoor Life;Oct93, Vol. 189 Issue 4, p12
Reports on the United States Fish and Wildlife Service's ruling that any existence of grizzly population in southwestern Colorado's San Juan Mountain range will remain listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. Response to a petition by the Sierra Institute and Life Net for...
- Do We Have Enough Wolves? Belford, Alan // Field & Stream;Nov2000, Vol. 105 Issue 7, p16
Reports on the United States Fish and Wildlife Service's proposal that wolves be shifted from 'endangered' to 'threatened' status under the Endangered Species Act.
- Elimination of Category 2 candidate species list Crystal, Howard M. // Endangered Species Update;Jan/Feb1997, Vol. 14 Issue 1/2, p7
No abstract available.