TITLE

Statutory Complexity Disguises Agency Capture in Citizens Coal Council v. EPA

AUTHOR(S)
Mullen, Reid
PUB. DATE
August 2007
SOURCE
Ecology Law Quarterly;2007, Vol. 34 Issue 3, p927
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
In Citizens Coal Council v. EPA, an en banc panel for the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals considered a challenge to EPA regulations promulgated pursuant to the Clean Water Act (CWA). The EPA promulgated the regulations in an attempt to incentivize coal companies to remine once abandoned mine sites. Petitioners, two nonprofit environmental organizations, claimed that the regulations violated the Clean Water Act and Administrative Procedure Act by allowing coal companies to remine without adhering to any enforceable pollution limitations. The EPA countered that more remining would improve water quality at abandoned sites. The Sixth Circuit rejected Petitioners' claims, finding that the EPA's regulations were reasonably consistent with the CWA's goal of restoring the integrity of the nation's waters. In so holding, the court struggled to understand the meaning of the CWA's complex procedural and technical language, and allowed the EPA to justify the rule based on the CWA's broad statement of purpose. Such superficial judicial review sets a dangerous precedent in environmental law, because it exacerbates the risk of agency capture. A captured agency promulgates regulations that benefit industry, not the environment. Without the judiciary acting as a meaningful check against agency capture, the public loses a valuable tool in the fight against major industrial polluters like the domestic coal industry. Citizens Coal Council therefore stands as a cautionary tale, a warning sign that the judiciary may be unable to identify agency capture where the regulations at issue are promulgated pursuant to a complex statute like the Clean Water Act.
ACCESSION #
29306299

 

Related Articles

  • Another hurdle for Pebble Project; EPA initiates seldom-used review process.  // Mining Engineering;Apr2014, Vol. 66 Issue 4, p12 

    The article reports on a seldom-used review process initiated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that could eventually block the development of the proposed Pebble Mine in Alaska. It mentions the possible use of the Clean Water Act by the EPA to veto the mine. It discusses a draft...

  • Environmental Issues Bear Watching. Morrissey, James A. // Textile World;Feb2000, Vol. 150 Issue 2, p14 

    Reports on several regulatory issues that are affecting the textile industry in the United States (US) as of February 2000. Renewal of a legislation authorizing the US Environmental Protection Agency's Superfund industrial site waste cleanup program; Reauthorization of the Clean Water Act;...

  • EPA salutes clean up efforts of Wyoming mining operation.  // Journal of Environmental Health;Jul/Aug1995, Vol. 58 Issue 1, p36 

    Reports on the verdict given by the inspectors of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on the Campbell County, Wyoming mine. Developments in the clean up efforts; Improvements at the mine; Benefits of enforcing environmental laws.

  • CLEAN WATER ACT STILL MURKY. Madison, Adam // Rock Products;Oct2003, Vol. 106 Issue 10, p34 

    Focuses on issues related to the U.S. Clean Water Act as of October 2003. Decision of the Supreme Court on the case Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County versus the Army Corps of Engineers in 2001; Discussion on the regulation of all waters that are isolated from navigable waters;...

  • Watered Down. Williams, Ted // Audubon;Mar/Apr2009, Vol. 111 Issue 2, p45 

    The article focuses on the Clean Water Act enacted by the U.S. Congress in 1972 to make all waters of the U.S. fishable and swimmable by 1983, then end all pollution by 1985. The law authorized the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to set limits on pollution by awarding discharge permits....

  • Study: EPA system obsolete. Geiselman, Bruce // Waste News;6/9/2003, Vol. 9 Issue 3, p3 

    Permit Compliance System, a computer system used by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to track water pollution and monitor compliance is "incomplete, obsolete, and difficult to use," according to a report from the agency's Inspector General's Office. The agency needs to modernize...

  • WASTE GENERATOR BRIEFS.  // Waste News;11/21/2005, Vol. 11 Issue 15, p5 

    The article presents news briefs related to waste generators. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. companies, government and other entities spent a record $10 billion to comply with environmental laws in fiscal 2005. EPA enforcement actions will reduce a projected 1.1...

  • EPA PROPOSES NEW COOLING WATER INTAKE STRUCTURE STANDARDS.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2011 Q2, Special section p1 

    The article focuses on the proposed new rule issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) which would set standards for the cooling water intake structures at most existing facilities. It offers information on the two alternatives that are established in the proposed rule to meet the...

  • ENHANCED CLEAN WATER ACT ENFORCEMENT. Chajet, Henry; Stewart, Scott // Coal Age;Jan2010, Vol. 115 Issue 1, p56 

    The article offers information on the attributes and significance of the Clean Water Act (CWA) by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the U.S. The enforcement of the said act will enable 46 states to run the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program and will ensure...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics