TITLE

Ad biz must kick the habit

PUB. DATE
March 2000
SOURCE
Advertising Age;3/27/2000, Vol. 71 Issue 13, p28
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article argues that advertising groups should rethink their opposition to new tobacco marketing controls. The U.S. Supreme Court has already rejected the proposal to allow the Food and Drug Administration to regulate tobacco products and tobacco advertising. The author believes that advertisers should seize this opportunity to end the alliance that has linked the ad business with the tobacco business for decades.
ACCESSION #
2920886

 

Related Articles

  • Senate opens debate on tobacco ad limits. Teinowitz, Ira // Advertising Age;5/18/1998, Vol. 69 Issue 20, p3 

    Focuses on the efforts of the United States Food & Drug Administration (FDA) to curb tobacco marketing. Possible effects of FDA restrictions; Mention of the US Senate debate on the tobacco bill; Concerns of tobacco marketers.

  • Ad groups fume in tobacco war. Teinowitz, Ira // Advertising Age;2/19/2007, Vol. 78 Issue 8, p3 

    The article discusses the difficult position advertising groups are facing with proposed legislation from US Senator Ted Kennedy to have the US Food and Drug Administration regulate the tobacco industry and its advertising. Ad groups can choose to do nothing or begin the long and expensive fight...

  • Industry plans suit over N.Y. ad limits.  // Advertising Age;1/5/1998, Vol. 69 Issue 1, p1 

    Informs that advertising agencies are planning to sue the city of New York over its proposed ban on outdoor tobacco advertising and marketing. The restrictions as the most far-reaching any government has attempted to impose on tobacco; Law expected to be signed by Mayor Rudolph Giuliani;...

  • Ad groups praise high court ruling on tobacco regulation. Teinowitz, Ira // Advertising Age;3/27/2000, Vol. 71 Issue 13, p4 

    The article reports on the decision by the U.S. Supreme Court which barred the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from regulating tobacco advertising. Attorneys for advertising groups said that the high court would likely to consider many of the First Amendment issues raised by the case. The...

  • Calif. tobacco case seen beating FDA at high court. Teinowitz, Ira // Advertising Age;11/29/1999, Vol. 70 Issue 49, p79 

    This article focuses on conflicts in lower court decisions over tobacco advertising rules of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The case on tobacco advertising regulation guarantee a decision by the Supreme Court. Earlier, a District Court judge in Greensboro, North Carolina overturned...

  • REGULATING FUTURE PHARMACEUTICAL PROMOTION. Morris, Louis A.; Pines, Wayne L. // Medical Marketing & Media;Mar2001, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p62 

    Reports on the need of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to change its regulation on advertising and promotion. Basic principles established by the agency in regulating advertising and promotion; Proposal to adopt a more flexible set of policies to enforce law; List of the proposed elements...

  • NEWS AND NOTES.  // British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition);4/11/1987, Vol. 294 Issue 6577, p976 

    Features medical reports and announcements of medical activities. Prohibition on the advertising of tobacco in the United States; Performance of the Tritonus group consisting of medical personnel in an anniversary celebration in Helsinki, Finland; Observations on the patients undergoing...

  • Kessler now seeks limits on tobacco ads for adults. Teinowitz, Ira // Advertising Age;8/4/1997, Vol. 68 Issue 31, p40 

    Discusses the efforts of David Kessler, former US Food & Drug Administration commissioner to limit cigarette advertising aimed at those over the age of 18. Kessler's call for stronger legislation regulating tobacco advertising; The reluctance of the US Senate.

  • A useless law falls to an odious Charter. Serres, Christopher // Alberta Report / Newsmagazine;10/9/95, Vol. 22 Issue 43, p32 

    Informs that the Supreme Court of Canada has overturned a federal ban on tobacco advertising. The 5-4 decision; Majority opinion that the ban violated the industry's constitutional right to free expression; Legal experts arguing that this victory for the Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a blow...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics