TITLE

P&G, Unilever slash TV spending

AUTHOR(S)
Neff, Jack; Cardona, Mercedes M.
PUB. DATE
March 2000
SOURCE
Advertising Age;3/20/2000, Vol. 71 Issue 12, p4
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article focuses on the decision of package-goods companies Procter & Gamble (P&G) Co. and Unilever PLC to start slashing television (TV) spending in 1999. One reason for the decision of the companies is that dot-coms, telephone companies and drug companies are pouring millions into TV, causing lower-margin package-goods companies to be simply priced out of the market. P&G cut TV spending to 1.2 billion U.S. dollars, down more than 11 percent compared to the year-earlier period, as part of an overall decline of 4.3 percent in measured media spending for the 12 months ended November 30, 1999. Unilever, which faced an earnings disappointment of its own in November 1993, is slashing overall advertising spending 22 percent to 547 million U.S. dollars. Procter & Gamble's move from TV to print is more pronounced in beauty care, which saw several radical shifts in media outlays in 1999. P&G slashed overall spending on what had been its biggest-spending brand Pantene, from 149 million to 71 million U.S. dollars, increasing the print share of the budget from 26 to 37 percent. Pantene, despite the cut in spending and greater emphasis on lower-cost print, grew its market share for the 52-week period ended January 30, 2000. Its share was up 0.2 percentage points to 14.1 percent in shampoo. The exodus from TV to print also could provide a glimpse into how P&G plans to use efficiency to keep launching new brands without breaking its marketing budget and triggering another devastating earnings surprise.
ACCESSION #
2906900

 

Related Articles

  • Health & Beauty. Bittar, Christine // Brandweek;5/1/2006, Vol. 47 Issue 18, pSR22 

    The article focuses on the advertising spending of health & beauty firms in the U.S. as of May 2006. Television advertising spending was reduced by Procter & Gamble in favor of Internet and other direct-to-consumer efforts. There was an increase in television buys in the skin care segment in...

  • U.S. turns on Euro TV. Britt, Bill // Advertising Age;6/24/1991, Vol. 62 Issue 26, p59 

    Reports that U.S.-based marketers have dominated the top 100 pan-European brands in television advertising spending in 1990. Total amount of the combined television advertising spending of U.S. marketers; Criteria in determining a pan-European brand; Worth of advertising expenditures of Procter...

  • FMCGs shun online as TV ad prices fall. Jones, Gareth // Revolution (14605953);May2009, p17 

    The article looks at the decision of fast moving consumer goods (FMCG) brand owners to shift their spending away from online advertising due to the decreasing cost of television (TV) advertising, according to industry insiders. It has been claimed that FMCG brands want to take advantage of cheap...

  • Unilever no show? Titan sounds off on upfront. Neff, Jack // Advertising Age;5/14/2007, Vol. 78 Issue 20, p1 

    The author reports that Unilever Americas is re-evaluating its position on the television upfront. According to the article it is unlikely Unilever is under budgetary pressure to cut back on upfront spending due to their sales growth. Other companies such as Proctor and Gamble remain committed...

  • Hello Again, Big Spenders. Reynolds, Mike // Multichannel News;11/24/2003, Vol. 24 Issue 47, p19 

    Focuses on advertising spending on cable television in the U.S. as of September 2003. Top 10 advertising spenders; Increase in the advertising spending of WorldCom in 2002 and 2003; Total advertising spending of Procter & Gamble in 2003.

  • Get a little closer. Vence, Deborah L. // Marketing News;1/15/2005, Vol. 39 Issue 1, p17 

    Reports on the increased marketing competition in the second and third generation Hispanic and Asian markets in the U.S. as of January 2005. Information on the advertising spending of Hispanics; Details on television and print advertising budget of Procter & Gamble in the country's Hispanic...

  • Health & Beauty. Case, Tony // Brandweek;4/30/2007, Vol. 48 Issue 18, pSR17 

    The article examines the health and beauty industry's fall 2007 media buying strategy. According to the article there will be a major growth in prime-time television advertising spending among companies in the health and beauty industry in 2007. The article looks at the marketing strategy for...

  • Health & Beauty. Bittar, Christine // MediaWeek;5/1/2006, Vol. 16 Issue 18, pSR22 

    The article focuses on the decline in the advertising spending of health and beauty companies for television in the U.S. in 2005. Procter & Gamble has decreased its prime time spending to $560 million in 2005 from $649 million in 2004. Varied demographic groups targeted is one of the factors...

  • Unilever and P&G in fresh haircare row.  // Marketing Week;3/21/2002, Vol. 25 Issue 12, p5 

    Reports the rivalry between Procter & Gamble (P&G) and Unilever television advertisement in Great Britain. Concept of the teaser campaign of the two companies; Demand of P&G to pull out the advertisement of Unilever; Threat of P&G for legal action to Unilever.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics