TITLE

Automakers, dealers disagree on arbitration ban

AUTHOR(S)
Stoffer, Harry
PUB. DATE
March 2000
SOURCE
Automotive News;03/06/2000, Vol. 74 Issue 5864, p6
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
No abstract available.
ACCESSION #
2890887

 

Related Articles

  • Manufacturers, dealers continue franchise fight. Harris, Donna // Automotive News;5/7/2001, Vol. 75 Issue 5928, p43 

    Reports the continuation of the franchise trial between car manufacturers and dealers against the state of Arizona. Provisions of the law prohibiting factories from owning dealerships; Impact of the law on retail prices; Claims of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers regarding the...

  • Consumer group attacks state franchise laws. Stoffer, Harry // Automotive News;2/19/2001, Vol. 75 Issue 5917, p16 

    Reports the launch of a campaign against state franchise laws by the Consumer Federation of America in Washington. Limit on vehicle sales competition; Advocacy for Internet competition; Response of the National Automobile Dealers Association.

  • Arbitration rules become key issue for auto dealers. Darin, Ann Therese // Automotive News;2/5/1996, Vol. 70 Issue 5644, p34 

    Discusses the importance of mandatory binding arbitration clauses in franchise contracts of automobile dealers in the United States. Grounds for appealing decisions offered by state franchise laws; Federal court ruling in 19990 that the Federal Arbitration Act preempts the safeguards and...

  • NADA urges Congress to pass arbitration law. Stoffer, Harry // Automotive News;5/31/1999, Vol. 73 Issue 5822, p3 

    Reports on the National Automobile Dealers Association's call on the United States Congress to pass a legislation that would ban mandatory arbitration provisions from franchise agreements between car manufacturers and dealers. Provisions of the legislation being supported by the organization.

  • Dealers must understand arbitration process. Chorches, Samuel Harrison // Automotive News;5/29/2000, Vol. 74 Issue 5876, p14 

    Comments on the Motor Vehicle Franchise Contract Arbitration Act of 2000 introduced by Republican senator Charles Grassley. Issue of automobile manufacturers' imposition of mandatory arbitration; View of the author that mandatory litigation is not the only acceptable resolution process;...

  • High Court upholds auto franchisee right. Jennings, M. M. // Marketing News;4/6/1979, Vol. 12 Issue 20, p3 

    Reports on the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in 1979 which upheld the constitutionality of the California Automobile Franchise Act in a case involving General Motors (GM) and its franchisee. Facts of the case; Provisions of California's law on car dealerships; Contentions of GM.

  • Car dealers go on the muscle to toughen state franchise laws... Harris, Donna; Wilson, Amy // Automotive News;3/22/2010, Vol. 84 Issue 6404, p8 

    The article presents information on a legislative bill in Florida on the automobile franchise agreement's continuation in full force and operation.

  • Dealers try to strengthen franchise laws. Wilson, Amy // Automotive News;4/29/2013, Vol. 87 Issue 6566, p3 

    The article reports that dealers and automakers in the U.S. are trying to get rid of state franchise laws, which they describe as a source of frustration. The issue was highlighted with introduction of a bill in April 2013 in Colorado, which is being criticized by the Alliance of Automobile...

  • Attorneys list dealer benefits in Arizona franchise law. Myers, Daniel; Fuller, Loula // Automotive News;5/22/2000, Vol. 74 Issue 5875, p16 

    Focuses on the Arizona franchise law governing automobile sales in the state. Impact on the Internet sales of automobiles; Requirements imposed on automobile manufacturers; Ways in which the law improve automobile manufacturer-dealer relationships.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics