TITLE

MicroArray Facility: a laboratory information management system with extended support for Nylon based technologies

AUTHOR(S)
Honore, Paul; Granjeaud, Samuel; Tagett, Rebecca; Deraco, Stephane; Beaudoing, Emmanuel; Rougemont, Jacques; Debono, Stephane; Hingamp, Pascal
PUB. DATE
January 2006
SOURCE
BMC Genomics;2006, Vol. 7, p240
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: High throughput gene expression profiling (GEP) is becoming a routine technique in life science laboratories. With experimental designs that repeatedly span thousands of genes and hundreds of samples, relying on a dedicated database infrastructure is no longer an option. GEP technology is a fast moving target, with new approaches constantly broadening the field diversity. This technology heterogeneity, compounded by the informatics complexity of GEP databases, means that software developments have so far focused on mainstream techniques, leaving less typical yet established techniques such as Nylon microarrays at best partially supported. Results: MAF (MicroArray Facility) is the laboratory database system we have developed for managing the design, production and hybridization of spotted microarrays. Although it can support the widely used glass microarrays and oligo-chips, MAF was designed with the specific idiosyncrasies of Nylon based microarrays in mind. Notably single channel radioactive probes, microarray stripping and reuse, vector control hybridizations and spike-in controls are all natively supported by the software suite. MicroArray Facility is MIAME supportive and dynamically provides feedback on missing annotations to help users estimate effective MIAME compliance. Genomic data such as clone identifiers and gene symbols are also directly annotated by MAF software using standard public resources. The MAGE-ML data format is implemented for full data export. Journalized database operations (audit tracking), data anonymization, material traceability and user/ project level confidentiality policies are also managed by MAF. Conclusion: MicroArray Facility is a complete data management system for microarray producers and end-users. Particular care has been devoted to adequately model Nylon based microarrays. The MAF system, developed and implemented in both private and academic environments, has proved a robust solution for shared facilities and industry service providers alike.
ACCESSION #
28858705

 

Related Articles

  • Relationship between gene co-expression and probe localization on microarray slides. Kluger, Yuval; Haiyuan Yu; Jiang Qian; Gerstein, Mark // BMC Genomics;2003, Vol. 4, p49 

    Background: Microarray technology allows simultaneous measurement of thousands of genes in a single experiment. This is a potentially useful tool for evaluating co-expression of genes and extraction of useful functional and chromosomal structural information about genes. Results: In this work we...

  • Assessing probe-specific dye and slide biases in two-color microarray data. Ruixiao Lu; Geun-Cheol Lee; Shultz, Michael; Dardick, Chris; Kihong Jung; Phetsom, Jirapa; Yi Jia; Rice, Robert H.; Goldberg, Zelanna; Schnable, Patrick S.; Ronald, Pamela; Rocke, David M. // BMC Bioinformatics;2008, Vol. 9, Special section p1 

    Background: A primary reason for using two-color microarrays is that the use of two samples labeled with different dyes on the same slide, that bind to probes on the same spot, is supposed to adjust for many factors that introduce noise and errors into the analysis. Most users assume that any...

  • A weighted average difference method for detecting differentially expressed genes from microarray data. Kadota, Koji; KNakai, Yuji; KShimizu, Kentaro // Algorithms for Molecular Biology;2008, Vol. 3, Special section p1 

    Background: Identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) under different experimental conditions is an important task in many microarray studies. However, choosing which method use for a particular application is problematic because its performance depends on the evaluation metric,...

  • SNPinProbe_l.0: A database for filtering out probes in the Affymetrix GeneChip Human Exon 1.0 ST array potentially affected by SNPs. Shiwei Duan; Wei Zhang; Bleibel, Wasim Kamel; Cox, Nancy Jean; Dolan, M. Eileen // Bioinformation;2008, Vol. 2 Issue 10, p469 

    The Affymetrix GeneChip® Human Exon 1.0 ST array (exon array) is designed to measure both gene-level and exon-level expression in human samples. This exon array contains ~1.4 million probesets consisting of ~5.4 million probes and profiles over 17,000 well-annotated gene transcripts in the...

  • Gene expression meets genome annotation. Gaasterland, Terry // Nature Genetics;Nov99 Supplement, Vol. 23, p19 

    Presents an abstract for the article on the integration of genome sequence annotation and cDNA microarray gene expression data.

  • Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)?toward standards for microarray data. Brazma, Alvis; Hingamp, Pascal; Quackenbush, John; Sherlock, Gavin; Spellman, Paul; Stoeckert, Chris; Aach, John; Ansorge, Wilhelm; Ball, Catherine A.; Causton, Helen C.; Gaasterland, Terry; Glenisson, Patrick; Holstege, Frank C.P.; Kim, Irene F.; Markowitz, Victor; Matese, John C.; Parkinson, Helen; Robinson, Alan; Sarkans, Ugis // Nature Genetics;Dec2001, Vol. 29 Issue 4, p365 

    Microarray analysis has become a widely used tool for the generation of gene expression data on a genomic scale. Although many significant results have been derived from microarray studies, one limitation has been the lack of standards for presenting and exchanging such data. Here we present a...

  • A class of models for analyzing GeneChip gene expression analysis array data. Wenhong Fan; Pritchard, Joel I.; James M. Olson; Khalid, Najma; Lue Ping Zhao // BMC Genomics;2005, Vol. 6, p1 

    Background: Various analytical methods exist that first quantify gene expression and then analyze differentially expressed genes from Affymetrix GeneChip® gene expression analysis array data. These methods differ in the choice of probe measure (quantification of probe hybridization),...

  • An analysis of intra array repeats: the good, the bad and the non informative. Elbez, Yedid; Farkash-Amar, Shlomit; Simon, Itamar // BMC Genomics;2006, Vol. 7, p136 

    Background: On most common microarray platforms many genes are represented by multiple probes. Although this is quite common no one has systematically explored the concordance between probes mapped to the same gene. Results: Here we present an analysis of all the cases of multiple probe sets...

  • Microarray MAPH: accurate array-based detection of relative copy number in genomic DNA. Gibbons, Brian; Datta, Parikkhit; Wu2, Ying; Chan, Alan; Armour, John AL // BMC Genomics;2006, Vol. 7, p163 

    Background: Current methods for measurement of copy number do not combine all the desirable qualities of convenience, throughput, economy, accuracy and resolution. In this study, to improve the throughput associated with Multiplex Amplifiable Probe Hybridisation (MAPH) we aimed to develop a...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics