TITLE

HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES ON DO NOT RESUSCITATE ORDERS AND ADVANCE DIRECTIVES IN PATIENT CARE

AUTHOR(S)
Payne, Judith
PUB. DATE
March 2007
SOURCE
Oncology Nursing Forum;Mar2007, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p545
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Advances in medical technology have created a new relationship between medicine and society. Decisions about resuscitation and other life-sustaining treatments, once intensely private, have become matters of public debate and community concern. It is no longer clear whether all available technology must be used to preserve life. Rather, in light of the increasing array of technologies to extend life, society has become more concerned about the individual's right to determine how that technology will be used. The uncertainty, confusion and general lack of knowledge about do not resuscitate (DNR) orders and advance directives has created a slippery slope for all, and especially difficult for those in oncology. The purpose of this presentation is to provide an overview of the history of DNR orders and advance directives, and examine the clinical implications for nursing practice. The theoretical framework guiding this paper are components from ethical and legal doctrines and from the conceptualization of self-determination. A synthesized review of relevant literature provided a historical overview of DNR orders and advance directives. A review of legal doctrines, pertinent guidelines, and professional position papers currently guiding clinical decision making regarding these sensitive issues will be presented. A review of papers in the rare documents section of a university-based library and literature related to DNR and advance directives was conducted. Examination of historical and current documents provided an evaluative measure of how these concepts developed, reflect current practice, and how they influence our clinical decision making and education efforts today. The development of new technologies has made it increasingly clear that medical choices involve moral choices. The need to balance competing values in our delivery of care often gives rise to conflict and uncertainty. This uncertainty is heightened by limited, and sometimes conflicting, information from legal and ethical scholars in a field where technological advances increase faster than legal precedents. Since the legal process is often not well-suited to respond to urgent clinical decisions about individual medical treatments, it is imperative that nurses and physicians develop a process whereby these decisions will be handled effectively and timely.
ACCESSION #
28835407

 

Related Articles

  • Patient had DNR notice "put in her notes without her knowledge". Dyer, Clare // BMJ: British Medical Journal;11/10/2012, Vol. 345 Issue 7882, p4 

    The article discusses about a case filed in London High Court by family of a 63 year old woman against Addenbrooke’s Hospital, claiming that the hospital doctors had put a “do not resuscitate” (DNR) notice twice in the woman’s medical notes without her knowledge. It...

  • Resuscitation bill gets hearing in committee.  // AHA News;12/15/97, Vol. 33 Issue 48, p6 

    Reports on the Ohio Hospital Association's expression of support for a bill that would implement a statewide system to help providers recognize and carry out the wishes of patients with do-not-resuscitate orders. Requirement of the state Department of Health to develop statewide protocols to...

  • DNR orders take to the streets. Begany, Timothy // RN;Jan95, Vol. 58 Issue 1, p14 

    Reports on the enactment of out-of-hospital do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders in 24 states in the United States. Measure to protect patients from unwanted emergency treatment; Provisions of DNR orders; Avoidance of liability for honoring DNR.

  • DNR Orders and School Responsibility. Sewall, Angela Maynard; Balkman, Kathy // Remedial & Special Education;Jan/Feb2002, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p7 

    Schools face many issues regarding students with disabilities, including identification, assessment, and programming issues. Another major issue with which many schools may have to deal focuses on do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders for children with medical conditions. Should schools honor such...

  • DNR rules tackle ageism in hospitals.  // Australian Nursing Journal;Nov2000, Vol. 8 Issue 5, p17 

    Focuses on the guidelines released by the government of Great Britain regarding the do-not-resuscitate hospital orders. Consideration of the order as ageist; Circumstances that allow the order to be given; Agreement required before giving the order.

  • Resuscitation: is it a technical or legal question? Yeomans, Paul // British Journal of Healthcare Assistants;Oct2012, Vol. 6 Issue 10, p506 

    Cardiovascular failure is a feature of all deaths, even though now brainstem death is the definition of death. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is presumed to be good practice, but 'do not resuscitate' (DNR) decisions by the patient or the doctor and clinical team are acceptable where (1) CPR...

  • When is medical treatment `futile'? Bennett, Allen J. // Issues in Law & Medicine;Summer93, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p35 

    Discusses legal developments and controversies in the definition and determination of medical futility. Do-not-resuscitate (DNR) law in New York; Case of 86-year-old patient Helga Wanglie; American Medical Association's definition of medical futility as both physician- and patient-oriented;...

  • Court verdict `splendid,' ethics professor says. Square, David // CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;01/27/98, Vol. 158 Issue 2, p159 

    Focuses on the Manitoba appeal court decision to give doctors the sole right to issue do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders. The comments of ethics professor, Arthur Schafer, director of the Center for Professional and Applied Ethics at the University of Manitoba; Brief details of the case involving...

  • In re Gannon ex rel. Coons. Salyer, David // Issues in Law & Medicine;Fall90, Vol. 6 Issue 2, p197 

    Presents a background on the legal case `Gannon versus Albany Memorial Hospital' wherein Carrie Coons, Edith Gannon's sister, made a do not resuscitate order (DNR). Objection of Gannon on the feeding tube inserted by the physicians on Coons; Gannon as the statutorily authorized person in behalf...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics