Managing Fine

Easterbrook, Gregg
March 2000
New Republic;03/20/2000, Vol. 222 Issue 12, p21
Focuses on the health maintenance organizations in the United States. Information that the U.S. Supreme Court case of Cindy Herdrich has exposed delayed crucial treatment in order to save costs by her physician; Description of the U.S. Congressional proposal of a legislation related to patients' rights; Description of statistics related to health care in the U.S.; Comment on the managed care cost-control methods are excessive.


Related Articles

  • HMO lawsuit may hurt state businesses. Strempel, Dan // Fairfield County Business Journal;10/16/2000, Vol. 39 Issue 42, p18 

    Reports that Connecticut business owners are concerned the rising cost of providing health care benefits. Results of a survey conducted by the Connecticut Business & Industry Association; Impact of Attorney General Richard Blumenthal's lawsuit against health maintenance organizations; Option...

  • Medical cost-offset following treatment referral for alcohol and other drug use disorders in a group model HMO. Polen, Michael R.; Freeborn, Donald K.; Lynch, Frances L.; Mullooly, John P.; Dickinson, Daniel M. // Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research;Jul2006, Vol. 33 Issue 3, p335 

    The purpose of this study was to determine whether specialty alcohol and other drug (AOD) treatment is associated with reduced subsequent medical care costs. AOD treatment costs and medical costs in a group model health maintenance organization (HMO) were collected for up to 6 years on 1,472 HMO...

  • Top Court upholds FTC order okaying doctors', dentists' ads. Choudhury, Pravat // Marketing News;5/18/1982, Vol. 15 Issue 24, p16 

    This article reports on the U.S. Supreme Court's decision upholding an order made by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which allowed doctors and dentists to advertise. According to this FTC order, doctors and dentists can now advertise without undue regulation by their local or national...

  • Patients Share Responsibility for High Health Care Costs: Structured Settlements Benefit Most, According to AIRAC Survey Findings.  // Risk Management (00355593);Feb84, Vol. 31 Issue 2, p82 

    This article highlights the surveys conducted by All-Industry Research Advisory Council (AIRAC) in the U.S. health care and insurance industries. The American public believes that patients are responsible, in part, for the rising number of lawsuits against doctors and hospitals. However, most...

  • Health at any price? Smith, Michael // Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine;Sep1979, Vol. 72 Issue 9, p713 

    The article reports on several schemes in solving the increasing costs of medical care for national health service in the U.S. The schemes includes the Health Maintenance Organizations which is sponsored by employers, the unions and universities that accumulate cost savings of up to 40%. The...

  • Texas Request for AG Opinion on Balance Billing HMO Enrollees by Out-of-Network Providers. Rogers, Elizabeth; Witt, Ellen L. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2003 Q3, p1 

    The article discusses the clarification request submitted to the Texas Attorney General with regards to Attorney General Opinion GA-0400. The opinion states that the Texas Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) Act does not prevent an out-of-network physician from requesting payment from an HMO...

  • Physicians And Prepaid Group Practices. Schoenbaum, Stephcn // Health Affairs;Jan-Jun2004 Supp Web Exclusives, Vol. 23, p76 

    Prepaid group practices (PGPs) are complex organizations that directly combine prepayment for health care with a comprehensive health care delivery system. PGPs' ability to manage their physician staffing efficiently must be placed in context with the cost and quality of their care. It seems...

  • Court's ruling may resurrect patients' rights bill. Gatty, Bob // Urology Times;Aug2004, Vol. 32 Issue 11, p38 

    Comments on the U.S. Supreme Court ruling which limited patient lawsuits against health maintenance organizations (HMO). Case background; Provisions of the ruling which prevents patients from suing HMO firms in state courts; Implications for patients and the physicians who care for them.

  • RUSH PRUDENTIAL HMO, INC. v. MORAN et al.: certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit .  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Rush Prudential HMO Inc. v. Moral et al., case number 00-1021, argued on January 16, 2002 and decided on June 20, 2002. Petitioner denied respondent's request to have surgery by an unaffiliated specialist on the ground that the...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics