TITLE

Acceptance of Noise Growth Patterns in Hearing Aid Users

AUTHOR(S)
Freyaldenhoven, Melinda C.; Plyler, Patrick N.; Thelin, James W.; Muenchen, Robert A.
PUB. DATE
February 2008
SOURCE
Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research;Feb2008, Vol. 51 Issue 1, p126
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To examine whether the effects of speech presentation level on acceptance of noise could differentiate full-time, part-time, and nonusers of hearing aids and whether these effects could predict hearing aid use. Method: Participants were separated into 3 groups on the basis of hearing aid use: (a) full-time use, (b) part-time use, or (c) nonuse. Acceptable noise levels (ANLs) were measured conventionally and at 8 fixed presentation levels. The effects of presentation level on ANL were determined by calculating global ANL (ANL averaged across presentation level) and ANL growth (slope of the ANL function). Results: Global ANLs were smaller for full-time users than for part-time users and nonusers; however, global ANLs were not different for part-time users and nonusers. ANL growth differentiated full-time users from nonusers only. Conventional ANL predicted hearing aid use with 68% accuracy. Compared with conventional ANL, the accuracy of the prediction for global ANL and ANL growth decreased, and the accuracy of the prediction at presentation levels of 65 to 75 dB HL was maintained. Conclusions: Global ANL differentiated the hearing aid groups in the same manner as conventional ANL. The effects of presentation level on acceptance of noise did not considerably increase the accuracy of the prediction compared with conventional ANL. Clinical applications are discussed.
ACCESSION #
28773985

 

Related Articles

  • Relationship Between Acceptable Noise Level and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit. Freyaldenhoven, Melinda C.; Nabelek, Anna K.; Tampas, Joanna W. // Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research;Feb2008, Vol. 51 Issue 1, p136 

    Purpose: This study investigated the relationship between acceptable noise levels (ANLs) and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB; R. M. Cox & G. C. Alexander, 1995). This study further examined the APHAB's ability to predict hearing aid use. Method: ANL and APHAB data were...

  • Siemens Expert Series: NAL-NL2 - Principles, Background Data, and Comparison to Other Procedures. Dillon, Harvey; Keidser, Gitte // Audiology Online;Oct2012, p1 

    The article discusses a seminar presentation by Doctor Harvey Dillon on using NAL-NL2 prescription, which is as simple as using any of the previous National Acoustic Laboratories (NAL) prescriptions. The goals of the NAL-NL2 are mentioned which include making speech as intelligible as possible...

  • Regarding DiGiovanni and Pratt. DiGiovanni, Jeffrey J.; Pratt, Ryan M. // Journal of the American Academy of Audiology;Apr2011, Vol. 22 Issue 4, p242 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Verification of In Situ Thresholds and Integrated Real-Ear Measurements," by Jeffrey J. DiGiovanni and Ryan M. Pratt in the 2010 Volume 21, Number 10 issue.

  • What are the Guidelines for Sonic Bliss IIC? Reichert, Erin // Audiology Online;Feb2014, p1 

    The article provides an answer to a question regarding invisible-in-canal (ICC) guidelines for Bliss100 hearing aids.

  • Observations on Hearing Aid Users' Strategies for Controlling the Level of Their Own Voice. Laugesen, Søren; Nielsen, Claus; Maas, Patrick; Jensen, Niels Søgaard // Journal of the American Academy of Audiology;Sep2009, Vol. 20 Issue 8, p503 

    Background: Evidence suggests that hearing-aid users have difficulties with own-voice level control, most likely because their auditory feedback is affected by hearing-aid amplification. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate how changes to auditory feedback affect the voice level...

  • In-situ Thresholds for Hearing Aid Fittings. Kuk, Francis // Hearing Review;Nov2012, Vol. 19 Issue 12, p26 

    The author discusses how the use of sensograms or in-situ thresholds increases the accuracy of the hearing aid fitting and simplifies the task of verifying audibility. He states various advantages of in-situ fittings, including portability, ease in determining real-ear thresholds, precision in...

  • Methods for Prescribing Gain for hi HealthInnovations' Hearing Devices: Reliability and Accuracy. Folkeard, Paula; Scollie, Susan; Allen, Prudence // Hearing Review;Apr2012, Vol. 19 Issue 4, p58 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the January 2012 article "Methods for Prescribing Gain for hi HealthInnovations' Hearing Devices: Reliability and Accuracy," by Dianne J. Van Tasell.

  • TK Control, WDRC, and Expansion: Distinctions. Staab, Wayne J. // Hearing Review;Dec2011, Vol. 18 Issue 13, p58 

    An excerpt from a blog post in the "Wayne's World" section of The Blogs at www.hearinghealthmatters.org. on July 17, 2011 is presented.

  • Preferred Low- and High-Frequency Compression Ratios among Hearing Aid Users with Moderately Severe to Profound Hearing Loss. Keidser, Gitte; Dillon, Harvey; Dyrlund, Ole; Carter, Lyndal; Hartley, David // Journal of the American Academy of Audiology;Jan2007, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p17 

    This study aimed to determine the low- and high-frequency compression ratios of a fast-acting device that were preferred by people with moderately severe to profound hearing loss. Three compression ratios (1:1, 1.8:1, and 3:1) were combined in the low and high frequencies to produce nine schemes...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics