TITLE

What are relative risk, number needed to treat and odds ratio?

AUTHOR(S)
Prasad, Kameshwar
PUB. DATE
December 2007
SOURCE
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology;Dec2007, Vol. 10 Issue 4, p225
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The effects of an intervention is best measured in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and can be expressed in various ways using the measures such as risk difference, number needed to treat (NNT), relative risk or odds ratio. Risk difference (RD) is the difference in risk of the outcome event between control and experimental group. Control group is not exposed to the intervention, whereas experimental group is the one that is exposed to intervention. The risk of outcome event in the control group is also called baseline risk. The NNT is the inverse of the risk difference and indicates the number of patients required to be treated to avoid one additional outcome event. Risk difference and NNT are absolute measures of effect. Relative risk (RR) is a relative measure and is the ratio of the risk in the exposed group to that in the unexposed group. Relative risk reduction (RRR) is one minus RR and indicates the fraction (or percent) of baseline risk that reduces with exposure to the intervention. Odds ratio (OR) is ratio of odds of having the event in the exposed group to that in the unexposed group. These measures are suitable for different purposes and appeal to different constituencies. Odds ratio is the only measure suitable for use in logistic regression and case control studies.
ACCESSION #
28720104

 

Related Articles

  • Prospective analysis of reasons for nonenrollment in a phase III randomized controlled trial. Murthy, Vedang; Awatagiri, Kasturi R.; Tike, Pramod K.; Ghosh-Laskar, Sarbani; Gupta, Tejpal; Budrukkar, Ashwini; Deshpande, Mandar S.; Chaukar, Devendra A.; Pantavaidya, Gouri H.; Agarwal, Jai Prakash // Journal of Cancer Research & Therapeutics;Jan-Mar2012 Supplement 6, Vol. 8 Issue Supp 1, pS94 

    Aim: This study aims to provide information on the accrual rate and to identify the reasons for non-enrollment of oral cancer patients into a clinical trial. Setting and Design: Prospective study conducted at the Tertiary Cancer Centre (India). Materials and Methods: Patients eligible and...

  • C-LETZ versus large loop excision of the transformation zone for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial. Boonlikit, Sathone; Thitisagulwong, Siriporn // Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics;Nov2012, Vol. 286 Issue 5, p1173 

    Objective: To compare large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) with contour-loop excision of the transformation zone (C-LETZ) in management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with respect to number of specimens obtained, weight of specimen, surgical margin, treatment time,...

  • The Comparative Prognostic Value of Directional Preference and Centralization: A Useful Tool for Front-Line Clinicians? Long, Audrey; May, Stephen; Tak Fung // Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy (Journal of Manual & Ma;2008, Vol. 16 Issue 4, p248 

    A large number of prognostic factors have been associated with recovery from an episode of back pain, and much emphasis has been placed on psychosocial prognostic factors. The large number of prognostic factors and the lack of comparative analysis of different factors make use of these difficult...

  • Randomized controlled trial of 2.5-cm versus 3.5-cm mesial temporal resection-part 2: volumetric resection extent and subgroup analyses. Schramm, Johannes; Lehmann, T. N.; Zentner, J.; Mueller, C. A.; Scorzin, J.; Fimmers, R.; Meencke, H. J.; Schulze-Bonhage, A.; Elger, C. E. // Acta Neurochirurgica;Feb2011, Vol. 153 Issue 2, p221 

    Background: This paper is addressing outcome differences in interesting subgroups from a previous randomized controlled trial of the extent of mesial temporal lobe resection (TLR) for drug-resistant epilepsy, by looking at effects of randomization, intended resection group, center, and true...

  • How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. Glanville, Julie M.; Lefebvre, Carol; Miles, Jeremy N. V.; Camosso-Stefinovic, Janette // Journal of the Medical Library Association;Apr2006, Vol. 94 Issue 2, p130 

    Objective: The researchers sought to assess whether the widely used 1994 Cochrane Highly Sensitive Search Strategy (HSSS) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in MEDLINE could be improved in terms of sensitivity, precision, or parsimony. Methods: A gold standard of 1,347 RCT records and a...

  • Rocuronium for nonemergent intubation of term and preterm infants. Feltman, D. M.; Weiss, M. G.; Nicoski, P.; Sinacore, J. // Journal of Perinatology;Jan2011, Vol. 31 Issue 1, p38 

    Objective:The aim of this study was to analyze clinical characteristics of rocuronium as premedication for nonemergent intubation in infants.Study Design:Preterm infants requiring nonemergent intubation were randomized to receive atropine and fentanyl with or without rocuronium. Outcomes,...

  • Acculturation and Health Care Utilization among Mexican Heritage Women in the United States. Bermúdez-Parsai, Mónica; Mullins Geiger, Jennifer; Marsiglia, Flavio; Coonrod, Dean // Maternal & Child Health Journal;Aug2012, Vol. 16 Issue 6, p1173 

    With the increasing Latino population in the United States, it is critical to examine the influence of the process of acculturation on health care practices and utilization. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between acculturation level and post-partum visit (PPV)...

  • Statistical Issues in Estimation of Adjusted Risk Ratio in Prospective Studies. Janani, Leila; Mansournia, Mohammad Ali; Nourijeylani, Keramat; Mahmoodi, Mahmood; Mohammad, Kazem // Archives of Iranian Medicine (AIM);Oct2015, Vol. 18 Issue 10, p713 

    Background: Binary outcomes are common in prospective studies such as randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. Logistic regression is the most popular regression model for binary outcomes. Logistic regression yields an odds ratio that approximates the risk ratio when the risk of outcome...

  • Effect modifiers of outcome of surgery in patients with herniated disc related sciatica? A subgroup analysis of a randomised clinical trial. Mark P Arts // Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry;Nov2010, Vol. 81 Issue 11, p1265 

    BACKGROUND: Tubular discectomy compared with conventional microdiscectomy has been introduced to speed up the rate of recovery in patients with lumbar disc related sciatica, although similar results have been shown. The authors performed a subgroup analysis to investigate whether certain...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics