- Courts-martial processing times and nonjudicial punishment rates. // Army Lawyer;Nov95, Issue 276, p29
Focuses on the court-martial processing times and nonjudicial punishment rates for the third quarter of fiscal year 1995. Armywide; Conus; Europe; Pacific; Other.
- Rates of courts-martial and nonjudicial punishments. // Army Lawyer;May96, Issue 282, p4
Lists the rates of Courts-martial and nonjudicial punishment for the first quarter of fiscal year 1996. Armywide; CONUS; Europe; Pacific; Other divisions.
- Clerk of court notes. // Army Lawyer;Aug97, Issue 297, p36
Presents statistical information related to the average processing time required for general courts-martial and bad-conduct discharge whose records were received from the Army Judiciary, during the second quarter of the 1997 Fiscal year. Comparison of the processing times in the 1996 Fiscal year...
- `Though this be madness, yet there is method in it': A practitioner's guide to mental... Wright, Donna M. // Army Lawyer;Sep97, Issue 298, p18
Questions how an accused's mental condition generally arise during the course of court-martial proceedings. Effects of a lack of mental responsibility; Distinguishing between mental responsibility and mental competency or competency to stand trial; Definition of mental responsibility; Details...
- The art of trail advocacy. // Army Lawyer;Dec97, Issue 301, p35
Defines the responsibilities of a Military Judge to ask questions. Details on examples to illustrate the responsibiity of a military judge.
- Courts-martial processing times. // Army Lawyer;Feb98, Issue 303, p48
Offers statistical information on the average processing times of general courts-martial and bad-conduct discharge which were received by the Army Judiciary during the fourth quarter of the Fiscal Year 1997. Comparison of the processing times of the previous quarter with those of the present.
- Forthcoming public inquiries. // Commercial Motor;8/6/2015, Vol. 224 Issue 5648, p20
The article lists forthcoming public inquiries in the East of England traffic areas including presentation of Ashbridge at a public inquiry on August 7, 2015, disciplinary actions against Rushen firm James and Julia Brown and a public inquiry for wholesaler, HS Smith on August 24, 2015.
- Caveat. // Reporter;Jun91, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p6
Presents information on the operation of military trials in the United States Air Force. Reversal of a decision on the grounds that the judge did not consider relevant information, consequently violating the officer's sentencing rights; Whether or not polygraph test should be permitted into...
- Practicum. // Reporter;Dec91, Vol. 18 Issue 4, p10
Presents detailed information on the Executive Order 12767 signed by American President George Bush on June 27, 1991, which will change the way in which the military justice system approaches the issue of whether an accused has been afforded a speedy trial, as required by statute and the...