Implementing 360-degree feedback

Parmenter, David
February 2000
Chartered Accountants Journal;Feb2000, Vol. 79 Issue 1, p70
Offers advice on the process of employee performance and development feedback. Difference between a 90, 180 and 360 degree feedback process; Consideration for the report format.


Related Articles

  • Deciphering Performance-Review Phrases.  // Workforce (10928332);Jul99, Vol. 78 Issue 7, p25 

    Deciphers some performance review phrases. Average employee; Zealous attitude; Quick thinker.

  • Red Flags In Performance Appraisal. Phillips, Kenneth R. // Training & Development Journal;Mar1987, Vol. 41 Issue 3, p80 

    Presents guidelines for monitoring the performance appraisal system. Employee performance standards; Written appraisal of managers; End-of-year rating of employees.

  • How to conduct effective employee performance appraisals. Decker, Joyce // Business Journal Serving Fresno & the Central San Joaquin Valley;12/21/98, Issue 322397, p27 

    Presents a few guidelines designed to make the most of employee performance reviews. Five key questions to be addressed that are focused on the individual; Quantitative and qualitative criteria.

  • Rate Your Association's Performance Evaluations. Morriss, Robyn // Association Management;Jul99, Vol. 51 Issue 7, p58 

    Discusses information on performance evaluations. Importance of an organization's human capital; Effectiveness of one-on-one meetings with supervisors; Need for daily coaching; Information on various appraisal systems.

  • Can Managers Appraise Performance Too Often? Kite, Devaun M.; Katz, Jeffrey P.; Zarzeski, Marilyn T. // Journal of Applied Business Research;Winter96/97, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p41 

    Focuses on a study which discussed the relationship between the frequency of performance appraisal and escalation of commitment to a losing course of action. Account of similar research; Methodology; Results and discussion.

  • Multisource better describes peer feedback. Martinez, Michelle Neely // HR Magazine;Jun95, Vol. 40 Issue 6, p16 

    Reports on employee performance surveys through multisource programs. Remarks on employee rating process; Availability of a guide book on direct-level personnel responsibility.

  • Conceptual Similarity as a Source of Illusory Halo in Job Performance Ratings. Cooper, William H. // Journal of Applied Psychology;Jun81, Vol. 66 Issue 3, p302 

    Discusses how conceptual similarities among job dimensions represent a potentially recalcitrant source of illusory halo in performance ratings. Raters' belief that rating categories are conceptually similar, thereby inflating observed correlation matrices; Students' evaluation of the conceptual...

  • MODELING TECHNIQUES APPLIED TO PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK AND APPRAISAL. Robinson, James C.; Robinson, Linda C. // Training & Development Journal;Jan1978, Vol. 32 Issue 1, p48 

    Discusses the applicability of the PerforMax system to performance feedback and appraisal. Shortcomings of supervisory practices; Benefits of the system to supervisors; Subsystems of PerforMax.

  • T.O.P.E.S.: Developing a Task Oriented Performance Evaluation System. Fowler Jr., Audrey R.; Bushardt, Stephen C. // SAM Advanced Management Journal (07497075);Fall86, Vol. 51 Issue 4, p4 

    Provides information on the proposed Task Oriented Performance Evaluation System (TOPES). Definition of TOPES; Job descriptions of TOPES; Benefits of TOPES compared with other performance evaluation systems; Disadvantages of TOPES.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics