FCC Slaps C-Block Firm For Default

February 2000
Wireless Week;02/28/2000, Vol. 6 Issue 9, p1
Trade Publication
Reports on the penalty given to SouthEast Telephone Inc. by the United States Federal Communications Commission for operating without authorization. Cancellation of its license to operate.


Related Articles

  • Open access: The only rule needed.  // America's Network;2/1/95, Vol. 99 Issue 3, p20 

    Explains the necessity of public network open access in order to move the United States telephone market monopoly into competitive status. Role of the Federal Communications Commission as mediator in the event of conflict; Insights from Heritage Foundation policy analyst Adam Thierer;...

  • Dateline Washington. Coorsh, Richard // Consumers' Research Magazine;Oct99, Vol. 82 Issue 10, p6 

    States the plans of the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on the ruling that would allow telephone companies to use or share information concerning customers without their consent. Indication of the court decision; Comment from FCC chairman, William Kennard.

  • Crosstalk.  // Telephony;10/24/94, Vol. 227 Issue 17, p3 

    Presents developments in the telephone cable industry in the United States. Includes United States Department of Commerce's granting of the 1994 Malcom Baldridge National Quality Awards to American Telephone and Telegraph Consumer Communications and GTE Directories; Federal Communications...

  • Carriers seek payment from Bells. Trager, Louis // Inter@ctive Week;11/10/97, Vol. 4 Issue 39, p14 

    Reports that competitive local phone companies are set to beseech members of the Federal Communications Commission to force Baby Bells to resume monthly payments on Internet dial-up calls. Names of these companies; Benefits of the monthly payments to the companies; Reasons why Bells stopped...

  • Dateline Washington. Coorsh, Richard // Consumers' Research Magazine;Apr96, Vol. 79 Issue 4, p6 

    Focuses on a proposal by the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that cellular telephone companies should no longer be forced to pay regional Bell companies a fee for completing calls to homes and offices that originate from cell phones. Other provisions of the proposal.

  • RBOCs push for recognition as cable operators. Eby, Deborah // America's Network;5/15/95, Vol. 99 Issue 10, p14 

    Reports on the response of Regional Bell Operating Cos. (RBOCs) to video dialtone (VDT) regulation by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Complexity of the VDT regulation; Problems with Section 214; Comments from Tom Rawls, vice president and general counsel of BellSouth Interactive...

  • Crosstalk.  // Telephony;4/18/94, Vol. 226 Issue 16, p1 

    Presents developments in the telecommunication industry. Silicon Valley's partnership with Internet; Telephone companies funding of congressional campaigns; Delays in licensing applications with the US Federal Communications Commission.

  • FCC defines cross-marketing guides. Silva, Jeffrey // RCR;02/23/98, Vol. 17 Issue 8, p2 

    Reports that Baby Bells and their subsidiaries will benefit from a United States Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) ruling on the marketing of customer information by paging. Restrictions in relation to the ruling; Comments from Susan Ness, a member in the commission; Criticism from...

  • Regulatory roundup.  // InfoWorld;07/20/98, Vol. 20 Issue 29, p47 

    Focuses on the effort of the United States Federal Communications Commission to adopt a process to accelerate the resolution of telephone companies' disputes. Ability for the regulatory body to respond to market disputes with the speed necessary to keep up with the increasingly competitive...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics