TITLE

Court grants Universal injunction against Collezione Europa

PUB. DATE
January 2008
SOURCE
Furniture/Today;1/14/2008, Vol. 32 Issue 19, p53
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports that U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina issued a permanent injunction against Collezione Europa USA Inc. from imitating designs from Universal's collections on November 30, 2007 in the U.S. The court ordered the infringing designs to be impounded and destroyed. Moreover, the company is also prevented from distributing furniture in its Nos. 20000 and 20200 collections.
ACCESSION #
28450164

 

Related Articles

  • Universal wins $11.2M judgment against Collezione. Combs, Heath E. // Furniture/Today;2/23/2009, Vol. 33 Issue 25, p10 

    The article reports on the $11.2 million judgment grant awarded by the U.S. Middle District Court of North Carolina to Universal Furniture against Collezione Europa USA Inc. It says that Universal wins the copyright damages against Collezione. Meanwhile, Collezione Europa was found to have...

  • Collezione owners to compensate AICO. Engel, Clint // Furniture/Today;8/16/2010, Vol. 34 Issue 47, p48 

    The article reports on the settled copyright and patent infringement litigation between Amini Innovation Corp. (AICO) and Collezione Europa USA Inc. and its former owners.

  • Bernhardt sues Collezione Europa over patent.  // Furniture/Today;11/12/2001, Vol. 26 Issue 10, p45 

    Reports the filing of lawsuit by upholstery manufacturer Bernhardt against importer Collezione Europa for patent infringement in North Carolina. Request of Bernard to account the profits of the furniture items in question; Response of Collezione on the allegations.

  • PUBLICATIONS OBTAINABLE THROUGH THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION.  // Arbitration Journal;Dec1965, Vol. 20 Issue 4, p257 

    The article reports on court decisions in commercial, labor-management and accident claims cases. The district court at Wisconsin ruled that disputes over dismissal of employee held not arbitrable where agreement, required partner's written consent for dismissal, and did not specify arbitration...

  • Twombly-Iqbal and Affirmative Defenses in the Third Circuit. Soos, Jeffrey // Pretrial Practice & Discovery;Fall2011, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p12 

    The article discusses two court cases in which the district courts in New Jersey and Pennsylvania ruled that the Twombly-Iqbal pleading standard does not apply to affirmative defenses in accordance to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 (c). In the case Federal Trade Commission (FTC) v. Hope Now...

  • D.C. CIRCUIT AFFIRMS DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS BROUGHT AGAINST UNITED STATES BY INDIAN OCEAN ISLANDERS DISPOSSESSED BY U. S. MILITARY BASE AS NON-JUSTICIABLE POLITICAL QUESTIONS INVOLVING MATTERS OF FOREIGN POLICY AND NATIONAL SECURITY ENTRUSTED TO...  // International Law Update;Jun2006, Vol. 12, p113 

    The article focuses on the affirmation of district court circuit regarding the dismissal of claims brought against United States by Indian Ocean islanders dispossessed in the U.S. Complainants filed a suit against U.S. and several senior executive officials alleging that the government had...

  • 2004-2005 ASSESSMENT OF THE SERVICES OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA.  // North Dakota Law Review;2005, Vol. 81 Issue 2, p235 

    Presents the results of the state bar survey undertaken in North Dakota for the 2004-2005 period. Civil filing rate; Overview of pretrial and trial services of the court in North Dakota; Nature of the lawsuits and role of attorneys before the court; Services of the clerk of the U.S. District...

  • Appeals Court Levels Class Action Playing Field. Nicholas, Adele // InsideCounsel;Apr2009, Vol. 20 Issue 208, p73 

    The article discusses a court case wherein an antitrust litigation class suit was filed in a district court. The district court accepted the plaintiffs' petition to certify a class action and present experts as witnesses showing injury to class members via common proof. The court refused to...

  • ARBITRATION.  // International Law Update;Jan/Feb2014, Vol. 20, p2 

    IN CONVOLUTED PROCEEDING INVOLVING ARBITRATION AND RELATED LEGAL PROCEEDINGS IN GERMANY, AS WELL AS RELATED LAWSUIT IN U.S. DISTRICT COURT, SEVENTH CIRCUIT GRANTS LIMITED DISCOVERY IN U.S. PROCEEDING DESPITE CLAIMS THAT THE DISCOVERED EVIDENCE MAY BE USED IN THE GERMAN ARBITRATION PROCEEDING;...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics