TITLE

Pharmacists not required to dispense Plan B

PUB. DATE
January 2008
SOURCE
Drug Formulary Review;Jan2008, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p6
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the ruling issued by federal judge Ronald Leighton in the Washington State court case over the rules in the state that required pharmacies to dispense the Plan B emergency contraceptive. Leighton has suspended the rules because he thinks that they violate the freedom of religion of pharmacists. Under the ruling, pharmacists may refuse to dispense the drug but are required to refer the requesting patient to nearest or nearby source for it. The federal lawsuit was filed against the state by pharmacists and a store owner.
ACCESSION #
28161517

 

Related Articles

  • PBMs enjoy wins, while retail R.PH.s nurse losses. Chi, Judy // Drug Topics;5/3/2004, Vol. 148 Issue 9, p42 

    This article looks into two legal decisions that are in favor of managed care groups and represents a setback for pharmacists in the U.S. In one decision, a federal judge granted the Pharmaceutical Care Management Association's (PCMA) motion for a preliminary injunction that would prevents the...

  • Invitation To Tea: Unanimous Supreme Court Says Federal Religious Freedom Law Protects Small Group's Use Of Hallucinogenic Sacrament. Leaming, Jeremy // Church & State;Apr2006, Vol. 59 Issue 4, p12 

    The article reports on the United States Supreme Court's unanimous ruling in a case involving a small American branch of a Brazilian-based church. The members of the O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao Do Vegetal refused to talk to media about the group's victory. The article also reports on the...

  • A Return of the Loyalty Oath?  // Perspective (08889732);Nov2004, Vol. 19 Issue 11, p7 

    Discusses U.S. court cases and rulings concerning the issue of requiring employees to sign loyalty oaths. Surge of loyalty oaths during the Cold War between the U.S. and Russia; U.S. Supreme Court ruling in "Keyishian v. Board of Regents"; Aspects of the cases "Sweeney v. New Hampshire" and...

  • Egypt lower court rules in favor of Bahá'ís, opening door to ID card solution.  // One Country;1/1/2008, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p10 

    The article discusses two court cases wherein the lower administrative court in Egypt has ruled in favor of religious freedom. The court cases revolve around the government's contradictory policy on religious affiliation and identification papers. It mentions that two cases regarding Baháí...

  • Is Religious Speech a Protected Right? Hentoff, Nat // Education Week;9/28/1983, Vol. 3 Issue 4, p24 

    The article reflects the author's view regarding the debate over religious speech as a protected right of students in the U.S. The issue stemmed when the federal district court in Scranton, Pennsylvania handed down the decision in the case "Lisa Bender v. The Williamsport District." The decision...

  • Emergency contraceptive's curious path to OTC status. Milenkovich, Ned // Drug Topics;Aug2013, Vol. 157 Issue 8, p60 

    The article reports that the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has announced an end to its lawsuits over age restrictions on Plan B One-Step (levonorgestrel), the morning-after pill, by deciding not to appeal the ruling made by Judge Edward Korman of the District Court of Eastern New York....

  • N.Y. senate OK's bill allowing sales of morning-after pill.  // Drug Topics;7/11/2005, Vol. 149 Issue 13, p8 

    Reports that the New York Senate has passed a bill which will allow pharmacists and nurses to dispense the morning-after pill without a prescription.

  • Ball on a Needle: Hein v. Freedom from Religion Foundation, Inc. and the Future of Establishment Clause Adjudication. Lupu, Ira C.; Tuttle, Robert W. // Brigham Young University Law Review;2008, Vol. 2008 Issue 1, p115 

    The article outlines the arguments and conclusions offered in the U.S. Supreme Court's opinions over the case of Hein versus Freedom from Foundation Inc. It also explores the relationship between the question of whether the Establishment Clause is constitutionally exceptional and the doctrines...

  • 'Wrong in Every Respect'. Remes, David H. // Education Week;12/3/1986, Vol. 6 Issue 13, p24 

    The article discusses issues related to the decision of U.S. District Judge Thomas G. Hull on the case "Mozert v. Hawkins County Public Schools." The judge agreed with the complainants that forcing children to learn reading from religious textbooks violated their rights of religious freedom....

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics