TITLE

Low adherence to colonoscopy in the screening of first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer

AUTHOR(S)
Bujanda, Luis; Sarasqueta, Cristina; Zubiaurre, Leire; Cosme, Angel; Muñoz, Carmen; Sánchez, Araceli; Martín, Cristina; Tito, Ilucia; Piñol, Virginia; Castells, Antoni; Llor, Xavier; Xicola, Rosa M.; Pons, Elisenda; Clofent, Juan; de Castro, Maria L.; Cuquerella, Jaime; Medina, Enrique; Gutierrez, Ana; Arenas, Juan I.; Jover, Rodrigo
PUB. DATE
December 2007
SOURCE
Gut;Dec2007, Vol. 56 Issue 12, p1714
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: Colonoscopy is one of the methods of choice for screening relatives of patients with colorectal cancer. Objective: To evaluate the rate of adherence to colonoscopy in first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer and describe the lesions found. Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional, multicentre, nationwide study was conducted. The study population was composed of first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer selected randomly from the EPICOLON study. Seventy-four index patients were included. These had 342 living first-degree relatives (parents, siblings and children), of whom 281 were interviewed. Results: The adherence rate was 38% (107/281). Adherence was greater in families with a higher degree of familial aggregation for colorectal cancer (88.9% for Amsterdam vs 33.3% for Bethesda and sporadic cancer; p<0.05), an index patient aged under 65 years (60% for patients <65 years vs 32.9% for patients ⩾65 years; p<0.05) and an index patient who was female (46.2% for women vs 31% for men; p=0.28). Adherence was also greater in relatives under 65 years (54% in patients <65 years vs 18% in patients ⩾65 years; p=0.05), in female relatives (49% in female relatives vs 27.3% in male relatives; p<0.05) and in siblings and children (40% in siblings and children vs 13% in parents; p<0.05). Lesions were found in 26% (28/107) of the study population. Nine (8.4%) individuals had a total of 18 advanced lesions. Conclusions: These results indicate that adherence to colonoscopy in our population of first-degree relatives was low. The adherence was more frequently associated with a higher degree of familial aggregation, a relative age of under 65 years, a sibling or offspring relationship, and female sex.
ACCESSION #
28105577

 

Related Articles

  • Colorectal Screening after Polypectomy: A National Survey Study of Primary Care Physicians. Boolchand, Vikram; Olds, Gregory; Singh, Joseph; Singh, Pankaj; Chak, Amitabh; Cooper, Gregory S. // Annals of Internal Medicine;11/7/2006, Vol. 145 Issue 9, p654 

    Background: Recommendations by primary care physicians for colorectal screening after polypectomy will influence rates of colonoscopy in open-access systems that do not require consultation by a gastroenterologist before colonoscopy. Objective: To determine the surveillance recommendations of...

  • Dispelling Fears about a Much-Needed Exam. Minkin, Mary Jane; Hanlon, Toby // Prevention;Nov2000, Vol. 52 Issue 11, p81 

    Offers advice to patients who are anxious about having a colonoscopy. Common preparations for the examination; What to expect during the examination; Who should have a colonoscopy. INSET: If You're Menopausal.

  • The Colonoscopy Dilemma. Faloon, William // Life Extension;Dec2004, Vol. 10 Issue 12, p7 

    Narrates the authors experience of undergoing a colonoscopy. Procedure in conducting a colonoscopy; Interval in conducting a colonoscopy; Refusal of the author to be administered with a sedative prior to the conduction of colonoscopy. INSETS: MEDICARE NOW PAYS FOR COLONOSCOPIES;TEXTBOOK...

  • Bowel cancer test could be used for screening. Baines, Emma // GP: General Practitioner;8/30/2004, p10 

    A non-invasive test for bowel cancer that is three times more accurate than faecal occult blood testing (FOBT) could be used in a national bowel screening programme, according to German research. Previous research has found that patients with many forms of cancer have raised blood levels of the...

  • Preferences for colorectal cancer screening strategies: a discrete choice experiment. Hol, L.; de Bekker-Grob, E. W.; van Dam, L.; Donkers, B.; Kuipers, E. J.; Habbema, J. D. F.; Steyerberg, E. W.; van Leerdam, M. E.; Essink-Bot, M. L. // British Journal of Cancer;3/15/2010, Vol. 102 Issue 6, p972 

    Background:Guidelines underline the role of individual preferences in the selection of a screening test, as insufficient evidence is available to recommend one screening test over another. We conducted a study to determine the preferences of individuals and to predict uptake for colorectal...

  • What is most important to patients when deciding about colorectal screening? Imaeda, Avlin; Bender, Danielle; Fraenkel, Liana // JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine;Jul2010, Vol. 25 Issue 7, p688 

    Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening can be administered through tests with varied characteristics and is a preference-sensitive decision.Objective: To assess patient experiences with a Maximum Differences Scaling (MDS) tool for eliciting values about CRC...

  • Improved Colorectal Adenoma Detection With a Transparent Retractable Extension Device. Horiuchi, Akira; Nakayama, Yoshiko // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Feb2008, Vol. 103 Issue 2, p341 

    BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Colonoscopy is an excellent but imperfect modality for colorectal cancer screening and prevention. We studied the effects of a retractable transparent extension device on adenoma detection rate as well as on intubation and withdrawal times. METHODS: Colonoscopy with or...

  • Increasing the Use of Colonoscopy among First-Degree Relatives: a Comment on Boonyasiriwat et al. Palmer, Richard // Annals of Behavioral Medicine;Jun2014, Vol. 47 Issue 3, p257 

    The author discusses a study about the increasing use of colonoscopy among first-degree relatives (FDRs). The author provides an overview on the findings of a study that are useful for developing targeted interventions to increase readiness and motivation to complete colorectal cancer (CRC)...

  • How often should sigmoidoscopy be repeated? Pinkowish, Mary Desmond // Patient Care;Aug2003, Vol. 37 Issue 8, p5 

    Discusses research being done on the results of repeat sigmoidoscopy three years after a negative examination. Reference to a study by R. E. Schoen et al published in the 2003 issue of the "Journal of the American Medical Association"; Findings of the study.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics