Protect Trade Secrets From a Corporate Raid

Flynn, Gillian; Hatch, D. Diane; Hall, James E.
February 2000
Workforce (10928332);Feb2000, Vol. 79 Issue 2, p92
Answers questions on corporate raiding or the hiring of a company's employees by its competitor. Advice to human resources professionals about illegal corporate raiding; Trade secret protection; Example of a trade-secret agreement. INSET: Update.


Related Articles

  • CORPORATE RECRUITING–UNFAIR COMPETITION CONSIDERATIONS. Redmond Jr., Joseph C. // Business Lawyer;Jan1969, Vol. 24 Issue 2, p459 

    Discusses the problems of acquiring trade secrets associated in recruiting corporate employees in the United States. Suggestions on preventing the acquisition of another's trade secret; Irrelevance of patent in determining a business secret; Yardstick provided by the natural and constitutional...

  • Going Back to College, to Trade Secrets Graduate Degree. McDaniel, Steve // Coatings World;Jun2013, Vol. 18 Issue 6, p24 

    The article discusses how companies can take advantage on the study of trade secrets at university schools in the U.S. It suggests trusting one's contracts, developing close relationships with vice presidents of research. It recommends staying intimately involved with the research and hiring the...

  • Dealing with trade secret issues. Lavelle, Michael // Fairfield County Business Journal;5/23/2005, Vol. 44 Issue 21, p42 

    The article focuses on issues related to the hiring of employees who have earlier worked for the company's competitors. The most obvious question to ask a former employee of a competitor is whether the employee has incurred restrictive obligations under a noncompetition agreement. This...

  • Pitfalls of Poaching Employees After A Deal Craters. Wright, James // Mergers & Acquisitions: The Dealermaker's Journal;Apr2007, Vol. 42 Issue 4, p88 

    The article looks at the consequences of hiring the employees of a competitor after an acquisition negotiation fails. It notes that one downside of including employees and revealing sensitive and competitive information in negotiations is the possibility that employees who decide to leave will...

  • Yahoo, Mforma spar over 7 new hires. Gibbs, Colin // RCR Wireless News;3/6/2006, Vol. 25 Issue 10, p3 

    The article reports on the lawsuit filed by Yahoo Inc. against mobile game-maker Mforma Group Inc. claiming that the latter is stealing company secrets as it hires the former employees of Yahoo. The company intends to seek an injunction in the California Superior Court to prevent the employees...

  • Sarcom alleges Insight sabotaged office. Jackson, Tom // Crain's Cleveland Business;5/17/2004, Vol. 25 Issue 20, p14 

    An out-of-state provider of information technology services is trying to steal trade secrets from an Ohio company by hiring away 13 employees from the firm's Cleveland office, a lawsuit charges. Columbus-based Sarcom Inc. filed the lawsuit May 4 in Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas against...

  • But it was just an interview! Kondon, Christopher // Workforce Management;Jan2005, Vol. 84 Issue 1, p12 

    Focuses on the legal implications of treading on trade secrets with job candidates for employers. Details of a trade secret case filed by Intel against Broadcom in Superior Court in California; Definition of trade secrets under the Uniform Trade Secrets Act; Advantages of requiring employees to...

  • Plus One? Davis, Kevin // ABA Journal;Aug2014, Vol. 100 Issue 8, p38 

    The article offers some useful tips, strategies and methods of recruiting or hiring office staff to be applied by solo legal practitioners and small law firms. It informs about steps to safeguard legal practice as advised by the trademark attorney Erik Pelton, which focuses on the creation of...

  • Hartford Files Suit Against Arch Capital.  // American Banker;7/6/2009, Vol. 174 Issue 127, p12 

    The article reports that Hartford Financial Services Group Inc. has filed a civil complaint against rival Arch Capital Ltd. The suit charges that Arch Capital hired some 60 employees of a Hartford subsidiary to illegally acquire trade secrets which would then be used to substantially harm the...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics