TITLE

AT&T Fights Indiana Disclosure Rule

AUTHOR(S)
Haugsted, Linda
PUB. DATE
September 2007
SOURCE
Multichannel News;9/24/2007, Vol. 28 Issue 38, p16
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on incumbent video providers and some state officials' opposition to a move by AT&T Indiana to keep information about its deployment of video service from becoming public. In a filing to the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission, AT&T argues that its attempts to launch competitive video service will be harmed if its competitors can see data in mandated quarterly reports.
ACCESSION #
27768463

 

Related Articles

  • AT&T's stealth drawing fire. O'Malley, Chris // Indianapolis Business Journal;9/17/2007, Vol. 28 Issue 28, p3A 

    The article reports that cable operators and video franchise holders in Indiana have called on the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC) to deny AT&T Corp.'s request of keeping confidential information on its U-verse video Internet service sites. Tim Oakes of the Indiana Cable...

  • SBC WINS UNE RATE HIKE, WANTS MORE OF THE SAME. Jackson, Donny // Telephony;1/12/2004, Vol. 245 Issue 1, p12 

    Reports on the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission's approval of an increase in the unbundled network element (UNE) wholesale rates that SBC Communications Inc. can charge local competitors. Reaction of AT&T Corp. to the commission's decision; Implication of the commission's move on the UNE...

  • Telcos eye possible competition from electric utilities. O'Malley, Chris // Indianapolis Business Journal;5/11/2009, Vol. 30 Issue 10, p7 

    The article focuses on the concern of the Indiana Telecommunications Association, in filings with the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission, regarding the potential of electric utilities to become ratepayer-subsidized competitors in data communications. It highlights the efforts of electric...

  • Telecom firms await new FCC rate rules. Olson, Scott // Indianapolis Business Journal;7/12/2004, Vol. 25 Issue 18, p19 

    Reports on the refusal of the U.S. Supreme Court to grant a temporary stay of a lower court decision striking down rules forcing incumbent telephone companies to provide discounted access to competitors AT&T Corp. and MCI WorldCom Inc. in Indiana. Decision of a federal appeals court to strike...

  • Inquiry targets cellphone subsidies. Human, Dan // Indianapolis Business Journal;5/6/2013, Vol. 34 Issue 10, p1A 

    The article reports on the investigation of state officials of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC) on how telecommunication company TerraCom LLC committed federal violations involving subsidized phone programs in Oklahoma. It notes that the service carries subsidies from federal...

  • Private IURC-utility chats a no-no. Eckert, Toby // Indianapolis Business Journal;7/15/96, Vol. 17 Issue 17, p4A 

    Reports that the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC) is expected to give final approval to a set of rules that circumscribe conversations about pending cases. Prohibition of the discussion of cases with anyone who has direct interest in its outcome; Hearing scheduled for August 26,...

  • Telecom companies criticize IURC's pace. Eckert, Toby // Indianapolis Business Journal;10/28/96, Vol. 17 Issue 32, p4A 

    Reports that telecom companies are criticizing Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission's (IURC) slow approach to utility deregulation. Persistence of barriers to competition; Response of IURC officials to the criticisms. INSET: The path to telephone competition..

  • Time to change utility regulation.  // Indianapolis Business Journal;10/11/2010, Vol. 31 Issue 32, p10 

    The author reflects on the need to bring candidates to serve as commissioner at the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC) before lawmakers.

  • BYE-BYE BOSTON. Farrell, Mike // Multichannel News;04/24/2000, Vol. 21 Issue 17, p1 

    Reports the sale of the Boston systems of Cablevision Systems Corp. to AT&T Corp. Shares of stock acquire by Cablevision from AT&T; Benefits gained by AT&T from Cablevision's systems; Value of the Boston systems; Advantage of the Cablevision-AT&T deal; Concentration of Cablevision to sports...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics