UK firms face tougher rules on redundancies

Berry, Mike
October 2007
Personnel Today;10/30/2007, p18
Trade Publication
The article reports that making staff redundant just became much tougher after a landmark ruling moved Great Britain closer to continental-style employment laws. A decision by Great Britain Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) significantly changed employers' obligations when consulting with staff representatives over collective redundancies.


Related Articles

  • CASE WATCH. Glavina, Joe; Harris, Judith // Employers Law;Oct2006, p11 

    The article presents a summary of the decisions issued by the British Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) on several court cases. The employment-related court cases include Prakash versus Wolverhampton City Council, Glasgow City Council versus Deans, Langley and another versus Burlo, and Draper...

  • IN BRIEF.  // Employers Law;Jun2008, p8 

    The article focuses on the rulings on employment-related cases in Great Britain. In Forces One Utilities versus Hatfield, the Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) held that it is appropriate to strike out a response when the employer's main witness threatens the claimant at the tribunal. In Kuzel...

  • Miles v Linkage Community Trust Limited.  // Employers Law;Jun2008, p8 

    The article focuses on the case Miles versus Linkage Community Trust Ltd., which involved a worker in a care home whose activities required continuous service around the clock. The employer admitted it had not given the worker that compensatory rest and the worker felt he was entitled to...

  • Put web misuse policies high on your priority list. Brahams, Gareth // Personnel Today;11/19/2002, p16 

    Discusses the ruling of the Employment Appeal Tribunal of Great Britain regarding the validity of the decision of the Hillingdon London Borough Council in London, England to dismiss an employee for accessing hard-core pornography from the internet. Factors distinguishing the misuse of computers...

  • LEGAL CHECKLIST.  // People Management;6/1/2006, Vol. 12 Issue 11, p21 

    The article provides an update on the ruling issued by the Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) in Great Britain to several employment-related cases. In the Royal Liverpool Children's Hospital NHS Trust v. Dunsby case, the EAT ruled that absence totting-up systems did not have to disregard absence...

  • Pay back time. Callegari, Paul // Employers Law;Dec2003, p14 

    Reports that employers may soon be able to recover some costs from employment tribunal cases in Great Britain, as of December 2003. Details of the decision on the case Kopel versus Safeway Stores PLC; Background on the process of settlement negotiations between employers and employees;...

  • IN BRIEF.  // Employers Law;Dec2008/Jan2009, p8 

    The article discusses several court cases tackled by the Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) of Great Britain. In RBS v. Harrison, the EAT held that entitlement to time off for defendants under s.57A(1)(d) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 because of the unexpected disruption or termination of...

  • ONE TO WATCH.  // Employers Law;Dec2009/Jan2010, p9 

    The article reports that the decision of the British Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) on the case Lyons v. Mitie Security will be published in December 2009. The case focused on an employer's refusal to grant an employee's request for holiday. The EAT will decide on whether a dismissal claim may...

  • Tupe Update. McMullen, John // People Management;8/28/1997, Vol. 3 Issue 17, p49 

    Reports on the British Employment Appeals Tribunal's decision in Wilson versus Saint Helens Borough Council that a variation of employment terms and conditions would be ineffective due to a transfer. Impact of the decision on business transfer law and the law on Tupe; Ruling from the British...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics