TITLE

IF PEOPLE WOULD BE OUTRAGED BY THEIR RULINGS, SHOULD JUDGES CARE?

AUTHOR(S)
Sunstein, Cass R.
PUB. DATE
October 2007
SOURCE
Stanford Law Review;Oct2007, Vol. 60 Issue 1, p155
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
At first glance, judicial anticipation of public outrage and its effects seems incompatible with judicial independence. Nonetheless, judges might be affected by the prospect of outrage for both consequentialist and epistemic reasons. If a judicial ruling would undermine the cause that it is meant to promote or impose serious social harms, judges might have reason to hesitate on consequentialist grounds. The prospect of public outrage might also suggest that the court's ruling would be incorrect on the merits; if most people disagree with the court's decision, perhaps the court is wrong. Those who adopt a method of constitutional interpretation on consequentialist grounds are more likely to want to consider outrage than are those who adopt an interpretive method on nonconsequentialist grounds (including some originalists). The epistemic argument for judicial attention to public outrage is greatly weakened if people suffer from a systematic bias or if public outrage is a product of an informational, moral, or legal cascade. There is also an argument for banning consideration of the effects of public outrage on rule-consequentialist grounds: judges might be poorly suited to make the relevant inquiries, and consideration of outrage might produce undue timidity. But in rare (but important) cases, judges legitimately attend to outrage and its effects as a way of ensuring against futile or perverse outcomes. An understanding of the consequentialist and epistemic grounds for judicial attention to public outrage also bears on the appropriate understanding of political representation; it offers lessons for the decisions of other public officials, including presidents, governors, and mayors, who might be inclined to make decisions that will produce public outrage.
ACCESSION #
27568911

 

Related Articles

  • Å iuolaikinÄ—s apskričių ir regionų valdymo problemos Lietuvos Respublikoje. Žilinskas, Gintaras // Viesoji Politika ir Administravimas;2009, Vol. 27, p90 

    Aiming to identify the trends of county and regional governance transformation after the Parliamentary elections of 2008, the article analyses the guidelines of the following documents: the election programmes of different political parties, the agreement of the ruling coalition, and the...

  • GOVERNMENT.  // Background Notes on Countries of the World: Uganda;Sep2005, p4 

    Focuses on the government of the Republic of Uganda. Branches of the government; Components of the state's judiciary system; Principal government officials.

  • GOVERNMENT.  // Background Notes on Countries of the World: Sao Tome & Principe;Oct2005, p4 

    Presents information on the government of Sao Tome and Principe as of October 5, 2005. Election system; Judicial system; Municipal government; Government officials.

  • Justice Under Fire. Trebilcock, Craig // Army Lawyer;Mar2006, Issue 394, p19 

    The article examines the progress of the Iraqi judicial system since 2003. The author informs the relationship between security and the establishment of the rule of law in Iraq is symbiotic. The rule of law cannot establish strong roots in a nation where the price of doing one’s job as a...

  • GOVERNMENT AND POLITICAL CONDITIONS.  // Background Notes on Countries of the World: Croatia;Mar2005, p4 

    Offers a look on the politics and government of Croatia. Role of the legislature; List of political parties united to form a coalition government during the parliamentary elections of January 2000; Composition of the judicial system; Government officials.

  • GOVERNMENT AND POLITICAL CONDITIONS.  // Background Notes on Countries of the World: Dominican Republic;May2005, p3 

    Reports on the state of politics and government in the Dominican Republic as of May 2005. Division of national powers under a representative democracy; List of principal government officials; Administration of justice.

  • GOVERNMENT AND POLITICAL CONDITIONS.  // Background Notes on Countries of the World: Dominican Republic;Aug2004, p3 

    Discusses the government and political conditions of the Dominican Republic as of 2004. Information of the representative democracy government of the country; Background on the elections held in Dominican Republic; Role of the judicial system and other branches of the government; Government...

  • GOVERNMENT.  // Background Notes on Countries of the World: Equatorial Guinea;Sep2005, p4 

    Provides information on the government of Equatorial Guinea. Administrative duties and powers of the president; Number of members that comprised the Chamber of Representatives; Information on the judicial system of the country; Principal government officials in the country.

  • SERBIA & MONTENEGRO: RISK SUMMARY.  // Emerging Europe Monitor: South East Europe Monitor;Jun2006, Vol. 13 Issue 6, p10 

    The article forecasts the political and economic developments in of Serbia and Montenegro. The ongoing negotiations on the future of Kosovo have failed to accommodate the conflicting decentralization demands by Belgrade and Pristina. Public officials are also restructuring the country's judicial...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics