Modeling the Evolution of Markets with Indirect Network Externalities: An Application to Digital Television

Gupta, Sachin; Jain, Dipak C.; Sawhney, Mohanbir S.
September 1999
Marketing Science;1999, Vol. 18 Issue 3, p396
Academic Journal
The usefulness of a technology product for an end-user often depends on the availability of complementary software products and services. Computers require software, cameras require film, and DVD players require movie programming in order for customers to value the whole product. This phenomenon, where the demand for hardware products is mediated by the supply of complementary software products, is called an indirect network externality. Indirect network externalities create a two-way contingency between the demand for the hardware product and the supply of software products, and result in a strategic interdependence between the actions of hardware manufacturers and the actions of software providers. Indirect network externalities are gaining economic significance in technology markets, because hardware and software are typically provided by independent firms, and both sets of firms have an incentive to free- ride on each others' demand creation efforts. Despite the ubiquity of this phenomenon, it has largely been ignored in the marketing science literature. We present a conceptual and operational model for the evolution of markets with indirect network externalities. The key feature of our framework is to model the market-mediated dependence between the actions of hardware manufacturers and software complementors, created by the direct dependence of consumer demand for the whole product on the actions of manufacturers as well as complementors. In addition, we incorporate marketing-mix effects on consumer response, as well as heterogeneity in consumer preferences for hardware and software attributes. We model consumer response using a latent-class choice model. To estimate the complement or response functions, we use a modified Delphi technique that allows us to convert qualitative response data into quantitative response functions. We integrate the consumer and complement or response models to create a simulation model that generates forecasts of market shares and sales volumes for competing technologies, as a function of marketing-mix effects and exogenously specified regulatory scenarios. The modeling framework is of interest to new product modelers interested in creating empirical models and decision-support systems for forecasting demand in technology markets characterized by indirect network externalities. The decision-support aspects of the modeling framework should appeal to managers interested in understanding and quantifying the complex interplay between hardware manufacturers and software complementors in the evolution of markets with indirect network externalities. We present an application of the modeling framework to the U.S. digital television industry, and use the framework to characterize the competition among analog and digital TV technologies. Our results suggest that complementor actions play an important role in the acceptance of digital TV technologies in general, and high definition television (HDTV) in particular. We find that forecasts that ignore the influence of indirect network externalities would be seriously biased in favor of HDTV. We illustrate how the modeling framework can be used to identify and profile customer segments in the digital TV market based on their utility for hardware-related features as well as programming-related features. We also illustrate the decision-support capabilities of the modeling framework by evaluating the sensitivity of the forecasts to varying marketing, regulatory, and complementor response scenarios. We derive implications for marketing and public affairs policies of the hardware manufacturers. The developments in the digital TV industry generally support our finding that HDTV will be a niche product, and will diffuse slower than originally expected due in part to the lack of programming. The delays in the introduction of digital TV to the marketplace also suggest that most forecasts for infrastructure-intensive technologies like digital TV may be too optimistic simply because they underestimate the delays in agreeing upon technology standards and resolving regulatory debates.


Related Articles

  • Ready for prime time? Meyer, Michael // Newsweek;9/28/1998, Vol. 132 Issue 13, p83 

    Discusses high-definition television (HDTV). United States introduction in August 1998 by Panasonic; Availability of other brands including Sony; Picture quality and what makes it so vivid; Availability of very large screens; Cost of the technology; Limited availability of digital broadcasting;...

  • Ready or not, here comes the future. Lafayette, Jon // Electronic Media;10/26/98, Vol. 17 Issue 44, p30 

    Reports on the debut of digital broadcast television in the United States, on November 1, 1998. Importance of going digital to the broadcast business; Cost of switching to digital for TV stations; Broadcasters' strategies to create demand for digital TV; Availability of digital TV sets.

  • Zenith says its digital TV standard best. Jones, Sandra; Halonen, Doug // Crain's Chicago Business;02/07/2000, Vol. 23 Issue 6, p40 

    Reports the development of a high-definition television standard by Zenith Electronics Corp. in the United States. Criticism on the standard by television broadcasting firms; Efforts to achieve a patency approval from the government; Level of growth of digital televisions in the consumer market.

  • DTV REPORT CARD. Griffin, Al; Tarr, Greg // Sound & Vision;Feb/Mar2001, Vol. 66 Issue 2, p107 

    Provides an overview of the state of digital television (DTV) in the United States since its conception in November 1998. Controversy on the transition to DTV; Evaluation on the transition of several television networks to DTV; List of terms issued to describe the cable compatibility of high...

  • DTV sets adjust to the market. Tarr, Greg // Broadcasting & Cable;04/12/99, Vol. 129 Issue 15, p42 

    Highlights the changes in digital television (DTV) in the United States, and the challenges facing the industry. Unexpected choices made by broadcasters; ABC and Fox's selection of 720p as the scan format for their high definition television (HDTV) broadcasts; Samsung's decision to add...

  • Hollywood: Hurray for digital. Stanley, T.L. // MediaWeek;04/07/97, Vol. 7 Issue 14, p27 

    Reports on television networks' and producers' move to exploit the digital television broadcasting business. CBS Inc.'s plan to install high definition television systems; ABC Inc.'s plan to convert to digital; Cost issues in digital conversion; Television productions for high definition...

  • Handling 5.1 audio. Brown, Russell // Broadcast Engineering (World Edition);Dec2010, Vol. 52 Issue 12, p18 

    The article provides information concerning handling of 5.1 audio in high-definition television (HDTV) in the U.S. The article focuses on how to record, mix, playout and monitor multichannel sound for EBU Tech 3307 and HDTV consumers. An illustration depicting speaker placement for 5.1 audio is...

  • Seeing the Light on HDTV. Rothman, Wilson // Money;Nov2004, Vol. 33 Issue 11, p187 

    The article discusses the proliferation of HDTV and answers common questions regarding the technology. Like it or not, your next television will be a high-definition one-and you're going to love it. Here's what you need to know. If you're like most Americans, you still aren't even sure what HDTV...

  • THE SCAPEGOAT. Mundy, Alicia // MediaWeek;05/08/2000, Vol. 10 Issue 19, pC54 

    Looks at the state of cable television (TV) industry in the United States as of May 2000. Criticisms against cable employees; Impact of cable on digital TV (DTV) and high definition TV; Implications of the delay of roll-out of DTV.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics