TITLE

Eminent domain's poster children

AUTHOR(S)
Gable, Eryn
PUB. DATE
October 2007
SOURCE
High Country News;10/15/2007, Vol. 39 Issue 19, p6
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article provides information on some of the ranchers who are on the front line of the fight against the military proposal to expand the Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site in Fort Carson, Colorado. Ranchers in the area believe that the military will use eminent domain to take their land because the Army has done it before when the training facility was first established in the 1980s. Kennie Gyurman and Maria Gyurman plans to raise a few head of cattle on the 148 acres they bought. Tim Roberts and Annette Roberts have been so embroiled in fighting the expansion and keeping their ranch afloat.
ACCESSION #
27270765

 

Related Articles

  • David Vs. Goliath: How A Band of Ranchers From Tiny Kim, Colorado, (Population 72) Fought The US Army...And Won.  // Wagon Tracks;Feb2014, Vol. 28 Issue 2, p5 

    The article reports on the U.S. Army Assistant Secretary Katherine Hammack's November 23, 2013 announcement that the Army has rescinded its 2007 land acquisition plan in Piñon Canyon Maneuver Site (PCMS), Colorado, commenting on the political role Colorado ranchers played in this decision.

  • Eminent domain. Patel, Purushottam H. // Appraisal Journal;Jan1995, Vol. 63 Issue 1, p91 

    Explores the complexities associated with the issue of eminent domain by Taking; Compensation; Inverse condemnation; Types of taking.

  • Appraisal methods and regulatory takings: New directions for appraisers, judges, and economists. Walter, William S. // Appraisal Journal;Jul95, Vol. 63 Issue 3, p331 

    Explores the application of appraisal, economic and financial analysis by courts in takings cases. Explanation of four economic factors used by courts; Court opinion screening methodology; Criticisms in current application of diminution in fair market value methodology; Alternative...

  • Property takings grab lawmakers attention. Johnson, Alan // Crain's Cleveland Business;05/19/97, Vol. 18 Issue 20, p9 

    Presents information on `takings' which are of emphasis in the General Assembly in Columbus, Ohio, due to the debate by state legislators of property takings by the government. Continuous debate over how to deregulate the state electric industry; What is included in deregulation; Comments from...

  • An essay on takings. Innes, Robert // Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm & Resource Issues;1995 1st Quarter, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p4 

    Discusses the economic arguments about the application of the takings clause and relates these arguments to the Supreme Court decisions `Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council' and `Dolan v. City of Tigard'. Legal landscape; Economic efficiency; Issues of distribution or fairness; Government...

  • Cattle Raisers: Special Session Should Include Eminent Domain.  // Bulverde Standard (Canyon Lake, TX);6/17/2009, Vol. 26 Issue 24, p1 

    The article reports on the call for the inclusion of eminent domain to the list of issues that should be discussed by the Texas and Southwestern Cattle Raiser Association (TSCRA) to Governor Rick Perry if the legislature will call for a special session.

  • The mall's expanding and you're evicted. Mansnerus, Laura // U.S. News & World Report;09/15/97, Vol. 123 Issue 10, p43 

    Examines the saga in Hurst, Texas, a suburb of Fort Worth, where the local government had to choose between a few hundred of its citizens and its biggest taxpayer, the North East Mall, which wanted to expand. The legal battle, proposed by angry homeowners, over whether a city can condemn sound...

  • Florida: Developers lobby for bill. Elder, Maria K. // Planning;Mar94, Vol. 60 Issue 3, p5 

    Reports on the takings bill pushed by real estate, agricultural and home owners sectors in Florida. Bill provisions; Apprehensions of concerned sectors; Plans to form a coalition to fight the bill.

  • Washington: Possible mischief afoot.  // Planning;Mar94, Vol. 60 Issue 3, p5 

    Reports on the possible harmful consequences of a takings bill, S. 6167, in the state of Washington. Provisions; Position paper endorsed by the American Planning Association (APA) chapter in the state; Recommendations and suggestions.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics