TITLE

Courts lack the authority to mandate joint or consolidated arbitration hearings

AUTHOR(S)
Johnson, Constance
PUB. DATE
January 2000
SOURCE
Corporate Legal Times;Jan2000, Vol. 10 Issue 98, p61
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on the United States Appeals Court case `Glencore Ltd. v. Schnitzer Steel Products Co.,' which is predicted to change the way arbitration agreements are written and could further encourage businesses to seek out mediation, as opposed to arbitration. Facts of case; Second Circuit ruling about consolidated or joint arbitration hearings in contracts.
ACCESSION #
2715960

 

Related Articles

  • Employer Loses Right to Arbitrate Due to Breach.  // Dispute Resolution Journal;Feb-Apr2006, Vol. 61 Issue 1, p5 

    The article reports on the Brown v. Dillard's, Inc., 430 F.3d 1004 case and the 9th Circuit court decision in December 2005 concerning an employer's right to arbitrate. The court focused on the idea that employers must participate in arbitration proceedings if they have arbitration agreement...

  • Considering Alternatives to Litigation.  // Corporate Legal Times;Jan2002, Vol. 12 Issue 122, p66 

    Presents the results of a roundtable discussion on alternatives to litigation in the United States. Arbitration and mediation; Applications of mediation in business-to-business issues; Advantages of arbitration over litigation.

  • The arbitration trap.  // Consumer Reports;Aug99, Vol. 64 Issue 8, p64 

    Focuses on arbitration in contracts and what it does. How arbitration and mediation work in the United States; Ambiguous procedures; How it is no bargain; How the defendants pick the judge; Recommendations; Finding out who arbitrates; Asking how to file a claim; Reforms necessary.

  • Litigation over ARBITRATION. Neil, Martha // ABA Journal;Jan2005, Vol. 91 Issue 1, p50 

    Deals with the enforcement of arbitration clauses in the U.S. as of January 2005. Reason of companies for choosing arbitration over litigation; Status of the litigation of employment cases by the federal civil system; Disadvantages of arbitration for consumers; Issues on mandatory arbitration...

  • COMMERCIAL--ENFORCEMENT OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENT--SCOPE OF JUDICIAL AUTHORITY--PUBLIC POLICY--AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION--FLORIDA.  // Arbitration Journal;Sep93, Vol. 48 Issue 3, p88 

    The article discusses the case "North American Van Lines v. Collyer" dealing with the enforcement of an arbitration agreement. Plaintiffs James and Patricia Collyer sued North American Van Lines for damages, alleging that their household goods were lost through North American's bad faith and...

  • CONSTRUCTION--ARBITRATION AWARD- TIMELINESS--WAIVER--OBJECTION TO ARBITRATOR JURISDICTION--ARBITRABILITY--SOUTH DAKOTA.  // Arbitration Journal;Sep93, Vol. 48 Issue 3, p89 

    The article discusses the case "Azcon Construction Co. Inc. v. Golden Hills Resort Inc." dealing with the timeliness of an objection. Golden Hills Resort, Inc. and Azcon Construction Co., Inc., were parties to a contract for the design and construction of a hotel-convention center and a...

  • ARBITRATION CLAUSE--REFORMATION DENIED--PREVIOUS OPPORTUNITY NOT UTILIZED.  // Arbitration Journal;Jun1966, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p118 

    The article focuses on a court decision involving arbitration in the U.S. Modification of an arbitration clause to exclude from its scope matters concerning employment duties of supervisory personnel will not be granted on ground that failure to exclude was due to mutual mistake, where evidence...

  • CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT--CONDITION PRECEDENT COMPLIED WITH AS MATTER OF LAW--ARBITRATION ORDERED WITHOUT REMAND.  // Arbitration Journal;Jun1966, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p120 

    The article focuses on a court decision involving arbitration in the U.S. Arbitration, in accordance with provisions of a construction contract, will be ordered by the Court of Appeals, where, as a matter of law, documentary evidence establishes that condition precedent to arbitration was met....

  • MEDICAL MALPRACTICE -- CALIFORNIA -- PARENT WHO HOLDS AN INDIVIDUAL HEALTH POLICY CANNOT BIND A MINOR.  // Arbitration Journal;Dec75, Vol. 30 Issue 4, p287 

    The article focuses on a court decision involving medical malpractice and arbitration law in the U.S. Where a pregnant woman had signed a hospital arbitration agreement, the court held that her unborn child was not bound by such an agreement and, therefore, the court ordered arbitration solely...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics