Evaluation of a card collection-based faecal immunochemical test in screening for colorectal cancer using a two-tier reflex approach

Fraser, Callum G.; Mathew, Catriona M.; Ashley, N.; Mowat, G.; Wilson, John A.; Carey, Francis A.; Steele, Robert J. C.
October 2007
Gut;Oct2007, Vol. 56 Issue 10, p1415
Academic Journal
Background: The guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) has been proved as a screening investigation for colorectal cancer, but has disadvantages. Newer faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) have many advantages, but yield higher positivity rates qnd are expensive. A two-tier reflex follow-up of gFOBT-positive individuals with a FIT before colonoscopy has been advocated as an efficient and effective approach. Methods: A new simple and stable card collection FIT was evaluated. Results: 1124 individuals who were 9FOBT positive were asked to provide samples. 558 individuals participated, 320 refused and 246 did not return samples. No evidence of sampling bias was found. 302 individuals tested FIT negative and 256 tested positive. In the 302 FIT-negative individuals, 2 (0.7%) had cancer and 12 (4.0%) had large or multiple (high-risk) adenomatous polyps. In contrast, of 254 positive individuals, 47 (18.5%) had cancer and 54 (21.3%) had high-risk polyps. 93 (30.8%) of the FIT-negative individuals had a normal colonoscopy, but only 34 (13.4%) of the FIT-positive individuals had no pathology. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios (and 95% CIs) for cancer were 95.9% (84.8 to 99.3), 59.2% (54.7 to 63.5), 2.35 (2.08 to 2.65) and 0.07 (0.02 to 0.27), and for cancer and high-risk polyps were 87.8% (80.1 to 92.9), 65.3% (60.6 to 69.7), 2.53 (2.19 to 2.93) and 0.19 (0.11 to 0.31), respectively. Conclusions: A two-tier reflex screening algorithm, in which gFOBT-positive participants are tested with a FIT, is effective in identifying individuals at high risk of significant colorectal neoplasia. This strategy is transferable across different FIT formats. This approach has been adopted for the Scottish Bowel Screening Programme.


Related Articles

  • Care within a Veterans Hospital. van Roessel, P.; Rouse, R. V.; Wren, S. M. // Surgical Endoscopy;Aug2007, Vol. 21 Issue 8, p1434 

    In 1998 the Veterans Administration mandated an externally monitored targeted colon cancer screening rate that was expected to result in earlier cancer detection and improved patient survival. The effectiveness of the protocol was evaluated in a retrospective case series at a tertiary care...

  • Could Colon Cancer Screening Save Your Life?  // Share Guide;Nov/Dec2008, Issue 100, p18 

    The article presents questions and answers related to diagnosis colon cancer including the symptoms of colon cancer, the risks of developing colon cancer, and the age factor for colon cancer screening.

  • What Can We Do About Low Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates? Rabeneck, Linda // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Aug2007, Vol. 102 Issue 8, p1736 

    The prevalence of colorectal cancer screening is not what it needs to be. Whether screening takes place according to a medical practice model or a public health model, we need to systematically evaluate interventions to increase screening adherence, identify predictors of screening uptake, and...

  • COLONOSCOPY FOR COLON CANCER SCREENING: SAVING LIVES AND DOLLARS. Lawson, J. Mark; Johnson, David // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Apr1996, Vol. 91 Issue 4, p814 

    Provides information on a study which examined the effect various screening programs would have on colon cancer-related mortality and the costs involved. Variables that may affect the outcome; Screening programs used; Response to the practice of colorectal cancer screening.

  • Common sense for a common problem: the question of screening the average-risk population for colorectal neoplasia. Vinden, Chris; McAlister, Vivian C. // Canadian Journal of Surgery;Dec2005, Vol. 48 Issue 6, p431 

    The article focuses on the question of screening the average-risk population for colorectal neoplasia. Heightening public awareness of colon cancer requires the ready availability of a test to reassure the individual. Colorectal cancer differs from breast and prostate cancer. Screening for...

  • Geographic variation and effect of area-level poverty rate on colorectal cancer screening. Min Lian; Schootman, Mario; Shumei Yun // BMC Public Health;2008, Vol. 8, p358 

    Background: With a secular trend of increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, concerns about disparities in CRC screening also have been rising. It is unclear if CRC screening varies geographically, if area-level poverty rate affects CRC screening, and if individual-level characteristics...

  • Colorectal Cancer Screening Methods: A Review. Wellbery, Caroline // American Family Physician;11/15/2003, Vol. 68 Issue 10, p2052 

    Discusses the study "Colorectal Cancer Screening," by J. M. Walsh and J. P. Terdiman, published in the March 12, 2003 issue of the "Journal of the American Medical Association."

  • SPOT IT AND STOP IT BEFORE IT STARTS. Hobson, Katherine // U.S. News & World Report;9/26/2005, Vol. 139 Issue 11, p72 

    Discusses cancer in men. Ways that men can prevent cancer, such as not smoking and getting screening to detect early forms; Description of a spiral CT imaging scan and how it can be used to detect lung cancer; Controversy surrounding the prostate-specific antigen test for prostate cancer;...

  • Communicating about screening. Entwistle, Vikki A.; Carter, Stacy M.; Trevena, Lyndal; Flitcroft, Kathy; Irwig, Les; McCaffery, Kristen // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);10/4/2008, Vol. 337 Issue 7673, p789 

    The authors reflect on a change in language which is needed in the informed choice information which is provided to patients who are considering medical screening. They suggest that there is a bewildering amount of information that is contained in informed choice information. They argue that the...


Read the Article


Sign out of this library

Other Topics