TITLE

WHX May Get Tender Toward Bethlehem

AUTHOR(S)
Radler, Judy
PUB. DATE
January 2000
SOURCE
Mergers & Acquisitions Report;01/10/2000, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports that WHX Corp. is contemplating a tender offer for Bethlehem Steel Corp. Primary business of WHX Corp.; Poison pill reduction made by Bethlehem Steel; Information on Bethlehem Steel.
ACCESSION #
2701442

 

Related Articles

  • The Dramatization of a Hostile Tender Offer. Lang, R. Todd; Block, Dennis J.; Barton, Nancy E.; Duberstein, Gary K. // ABA Journal;Mar1984, Vol. 70 Issue 3, p68 

    Presents the transcript of a fictitious board meeting of a corporation in the United States that is the target of a hostile tender offer. Advice of the legal counsel and investment banker on how to deal with the offer; Decision of the board incorporating the expert advise; Concern that the...

  • Medication in Moderation: A Case for Adopting Canada's Limitations on Poison Pills in the U.S. and U.K. Carpenter, William J. // Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business;Summer2016, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p547 

    Ever since shareholder rights plans or "poison pills" were devised, there has been staunch disagreement about whether the measures overinsulate management and harm returns or whether such defenses are necessary to ensure shareholders get the best possible deal in a change of control transaction....

  • Are Shareholder Proposals All Bark and No Bite? Evidence from Shareholder Resolutions to Rescind Poison Pills. Bizjak, John M.; Marquette, Christopher J. // Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis;Dec98, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p499 

    We provide a comprehensive examination of shareholder resolutions to rescind poison pills. We find that pill rescission proposals are more frequent the more negative the market reaction to the initial pill adoption and the lower the insider and unaffiliated block ownership. Votes for such a...

  • NATIONAL MARKETS AND NEW DEFENSES: THE CASE FOR AN EAST ASIAN OPT-IN TAKEOVER LAW. Pak, Bliss Burdett // Columbia Journal of Asian Law;Spring2007, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p385 

    The article analyzes the case for enhanced takeover defenses for East Asian companies in the modern context of global investors, open capital markets and disproportionate control structures. It surveys the current state of the American and Japanese experience with poison pills and staggered...

  • York Employs Hostile Takeover Defenses. Cecil, Mark // Mergers & Acquisitions: The Dealermaker's Journal;May2001, Vol. 36 Issue 5, p35 

    Reports on United States-based casket maker York Group Inc.'s plan to hire an investment bank after adopting a poison pill to ward off a hostile bid from Wilbert Inc. Terms of Wilbert's bid for York; Background information on the two companies; Companies likely to make a competing bid; York's...

  • Analysts: "poison pill" buys time for Navistar. Kilcarr, Sean // Fleet Owner Blog;6/22/2012, p8 

    The article discusses Navistar's shareholder rights plan, also known as a "poison pill," and how analysts view it. It notes that the company has revealed that the plan as a way to prevent coercive takeover tactics which may lead to unfair share prices for its stockholders. Stern Agee analyst...

  • How to Deal With Unwanted Suitors. Cody, Tamika // Investment Dealers' Digest;3/11/2011, Vol. 77 Issue 10, p8 

    The article focuses on the use of poison pills strategy to deter unwanted offers in company mergers and acquisitions in the U.S. According to the author, a ruling by the Delaware Court of Chancery encourages companies to use poison pills such as shareholder rights plan to avoid being targeted by...

  • POISON PILL PROTEST. Learmonth, Michael // Daily Variety;10/24/2005, Vol. 289 Issue 16, p5 

    Focuses on the decision of disgruntled shareholders of News Corp. Ltd. to protest over the 'poison pill' provision enacted to prevent a hostile takeover by cable television dealer John Malone in the U.S. Accusations against company chairman Rupert Murdoch on breaking a promise to put the poison...

  • Target firm may sell treasury stock to try to block takeover. Ashman, Allan // ABA Journal;Mar1984, Vol. 70 Issue 3, p134 

    Reports on the United States Court of Appeals ruling in 'Buffalo Forge Co. v. Ogden Corp.' concerning the sale and option of treasury stock by corporations to block a hostile takeover attempt. Legality of the defense under state fiduciary law or federal securities laws; Discretion of directors...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics