TITLE

Poll on court encouraging for right

AUTHOR(S)
Hill, David
PUB. DATE
October 2007
SOURCE
Hill;10/3/2007, Vol. 14 Issue 115, p22
SOURCE TYPE
Newspaper
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the findings of the study of Gallup News Service concerning the views of 1,010 Americans on the U.S. Supreme Court. It reveals that one third describes the body as conservative, while 16 percent of the democrats considers it as liberal. It shows that seven out of ten express great deal or fair amount of trust and confidence in the judicial branch. The results reflect the swelling ranks of the liberals, however, they have not yet claimed the majority status.
ACCESSION #
26996318

 

Related Articles

  • A supreme court that suburbia could love. Marquand, Robert // Christian Science Monitor;6/29/98, Vol. 90 Issue 149, p1 

    Suggests that at the end of the 1990s the rulings and the direction of the United States Supreme Court reflect, more than any time in recent decades an American mainstream set of values and views. Significant rulings on sexual harassment; The center of rulings on issues of economic rights and...

  • Why America puts its Supreme Court on lofty pedestal. Marquand, Robert // Christian Science Monitor;6/25/97, Vol. 89 Issue 147, p1 

    Remarks on the popularity of the Supreme Court in the United States as of June, 1997. The trust most Americans put in the decision of the court; The increasing number of cases being decided by the court; The cultivation of a more mainstream image for the court; The court's willingness to...

  • HOW THE `CONSERVATIVE' SUPREME COURT LEANS TO THE LIBERAL SIDE. Taylor Jr., Stuart // National Journal;7/08/2000, Vol. 32 Issue 28, p2207 

    Focuses on public opinions regarding the position and rulings of the United States Supreme Court on several issues. Abortion; Religion; Affirmative action preferences; Gay rights.

  • Vacuity and Farce. Chait, Jonathan // New Republic;6/10/2010, Vol. 241 Issue 9, p2 

    In this article the author suggests that absurdities exist in the current nomination and confirmation process for the United States Supreme Court. He states that the first absurdity is that whether a nominee is considered a liberal or a conservative is determined by whether a Republican or...

  • Do Policy Messengers Matter? Majority Opinion Writers as Policy Cues in Public Agreement with Supreme Court Decisions. Boddery, Scott S.; Yates, Jeff // Political Research Quarterly;Dec2014, Vol. 67 Issue 4, p851 

    Does the identity of a majority opinion writer affect the level of agreement a Supreme Court decision receives from the public? Using a survey experiment, we manipulate majority opinion authors to investigate whether individuals are willing to agree with Supreme Court opinions authored by...

  • The Myth of the Balanced Court. Sunstein, Cass R. // American Prospect;Sep2007, Vol. 18 Issue 9, p28 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court. It says that the court has a liberal wing, which currently includes Justices John Paul Stevens and David Stouter and a conservative wing, including Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Antonin Scalia. The author cites several changes in the court,...

  • Political liberalism and establishment clause jurisprudence. Foley, Edward B. // Case Western Reserve Law Review;Spring93, Vol. 43 Issue 3, p963 

    Focuses on the relationship between political liberalism and establishment clause jurisprudence of the US Supreme Court. Coercion versus endorsement; Impossibility of neutrality; Political philosophy to constitutional law.

  • The New York Times upfront TEACHER'S EDITION Vol. 140 No.2.  // New York Times Upfront (Teacher's Edition);9/17/2007, Vol. 140 Issue 3, pTE1 

    This publication presents a teacher's guide on recommended activities and quizzes related to U.S. Supreme Court cases, public opinions and college life. Teachers are advised to allow their students review several court cases, such as Kuhlmeier case, Vernona School District v. Acton and Deshaney...

  • Persecution in Germany.  // America;2/22/1936, Vol. 54 Issue 20, p463 

    The article focuses on the press censorship imposed by the Hitler administration in Germany as of 1936. It is indicated that the U.S. Supreme Court warned the public that any reports coming from Germany must be received with caution. It is stated that the German people are not able to express...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics