TITLE

Responsible anonymity and John Doe

AUTHOR(S)
Gibbs, Mark
PUB. DATE
June 1999
SOURCE
Network World;06/28/99, Vol. 16 Issue 26, p82
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Comments on the lawsuit filed by Xircom Inc. to stop an anonymous critic from posting defamatory opinions against the company on the Internet. Xircom's reasons for filing the lawsuit; Response of the Internet community to the lawsuit.
ACCESSION #
2662253

 

Related Articles

  • Keeping down the cost of libel suits.  // Commonweal;2/22/85, Vol. 112 Issue 5, p100 

    Editorial. The current, raging controversy about defamation suits by public figures against the media ignores a critical element--the requirement that any libel action be accompanied by provable and measurable damages. The courts should require that issues of damages be litigated first, not...

  • Courtesy keeps you out of trouble.  // Folio: The Magazine for Magazine Management;8/1/94, Vol. 23 Issue 13, p9 

    Discusses the proper attitude in dealing with libel suits and the parties that file them. Sensitivity to plaintiff's case; Publication of corrective statement; Favorable and not-so-favorable aspects of libel suits.

  • Toward "Hired Gun" Control. Kostelanetz, Richard // Humanist;May/Jun96, Vol. 56 Issue 3, p3 

    Focuses on libel suits. Functions; Principal objection to libel suits; Public attention on complainants; Cost issues.

  • Supreme Court upholds public figure libel charge. Fields, H. // Publishers Weekly;7/14/89, Vol. 236 Issue 2, p12 

    Discusses the US Supreme Court's ruling on Daniel Connaughton's suit against the Hamilton, Ohio, `Journal News' for libel. Connaughton, a candidate for municipal judge had been a victim of `malicious intent.'

  • When are you filching someone's good name?  // Supervisory Management;Jun95, Vol. 40 Issue 6, p5 

    Focuses on libel and slander. Differing points; Similar general elements.

  • Stopping libel suits.  // Washington Monthly;Nov85, Vol. 17 Issue 10, p12 

    This year, a series of libel suits has raised the usual drumbeat of complaints about threats to press freedom to a crescendo. To lessen the possible chilling effects of such suits on the press, libeled public figures should be required to accept retractions rather than financial awards that...

  • Defamation by action may `speak as loudly as words'. Roline, Alan C. // Public Personnel Management;Winter97, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p497 

    Focuses on the potential risk of defamation by action faced by companies in the United States in light of the 1995 case `Bolton vs. Department of Human Services.' Definition of defamation; Details of the case; Other defamation action cases; Lessons for employers.

  • Defamation in the business setting: Basics and practical perspectives. Langvardt, Arlen W. // Business Horizons;Sep/Oct90, Vol. 33 Issue 5, p66 

    Examines current issues in defamation or libel and slander issues and explores significant practical considerations associated with business-related defamation cases. Focus on employment termination-based cases; Sensitivity of companies regarding their business reputations; Set of...

  • Sharon's future.  // Newsweek;2/4/84 Supplement, Vol. 103 Issue 6, p57 

    Even though he failed to convince the jury that `Time' libeled him Ariel Sharon will surely try to capitalize on the victories he did win in the trial. Without a doubt, he will try to use the controversial case any way he can in advancing toward his paramount objective: To become prime...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics