TITLE

THE ORIGIN OF THE SPECIOUS

AUTHOR(S)
Coman, B. J.
PUB. DATE
September 2007
SOURCE
Quadrant Magazine;Sep2007, Vol. 51 Issue 9, p20
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article criticizes sociobiologists such as Richard Dawkins and Edward O. Wilson for using the theory of evolution to advance ideas that are not warranted by the factual or logical bases of scientific inquiry. It explains that the efforts of these sociobiologists to use evolution to explain the cultural activities of man is an act of faith or religion called scientism. It laments the state of Western civilization for its increasing credulity and stupidity. It calls on scientists to put proper limits to pandering by people like Dawkins and Wilson.
ACCESSION #
26604853

 

Related Articles

  • CHALLENGING TEXTS--RECEPTION AND TRANSFORMATION OF BIBLICAL TEXTS IN POPULAR SCIENCE. Nielsen, Marie Vejrup // Literature & Theology;Sep2009, Vol. 23 Issue 3, p276 

    The reception of biblical texts within works on science by evolutionary biologists has not received much attention previously. It is, however, an interesting aspect of the reception of biblical texts in public culture today. An analysis of some of the texts provided by evolutionary biologists...

  • The Skeptic's Chaplain. Shermer, Michael // Skeptic;2007, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p44 

    The author depicts on the issue involving physicist Richard Dawkins who has been awarded a gold medal after winning in the debate on the evolution of animal genes. It presents several views from prominent thinkers on the issue, involving the impact on the long-term future of humanity. They...

  • Group Selection Is Dead! Long Live Group Selection? Shavit, Ayelet; Millstein, Roberta L. // BioScience;Jul/Aug2008, Vol. 58 Issue 7, p574 

    The authors discuss the conflict in the biological science world over group selection's role in the development of eusociality, or social organization. Details about the philosophy of biology and the disagreement between biologists E. O. Wilson and Richard Dawkins over group selection are...

  • Coming forward to question the skeptics. Brown, Gillian // Skeptic;1998, Vol. 6 Issue 4, p18 

    Comments on Barry Williams' article on an Australian production company's alleged misrepresentation of the words of evolutionary biologist and anti-creationist Richard Dawkins. Inaccuracies in the recollection of Dawkins; Presentation of two opinions on the question of the origin of biological...

  • SELFISH GENES FORUM. Hutton, Bob // Skeptic;2001, Vol. 8 Issue 4, p25 

    Focuses on the significance of selfish genes for explaining the evolution of organisms. Benefits of the gene continuing to replicate on the organism it occupies; Analysis of the genes of an organism based on the 'The Extended Phenomenon of Dawkins;' Examples of genes destructive to the organism...

  • Evolution.  // Psychology Today;Jan1997, Vol. 30 Issue 1, p58 

    Presents zoologist Richard Dawkins' and computer scientist Jaron Lanier's views on evolution. Natural selection; Evolution's inability to answer all questions about life; Factors that distinguish man from the rest of the evolution process.

  • Developments in the New Atheism. Brown, Neil // Australasian Catholic Record;Jul2015, Vol. 92 Issue 3, p259 

    The article focuses on the trends of the onset of New Atheism and the influencing factors of New Atheism including the Judeo-Christian Heritage, the New Atheist Revision and culture. Topics discussed include development of western civilization influenced by Judeo-Christianity, the views of...

  • THE DIVERSITY OF LIFE. Steeves, Taylor // Structurist;1993/1994, Issue 33/34, p91 

    The article reviews the book "The Diversity of Life," by Edward O. Wilson.

  • Toward consilience, not literary Darwinism. Gottschall, Jonathan // Scientific Study of Literature;2013, Vol. 3 Issue 1, p19 

    All literary Darwinists take inspiration from E. O. Wilson's concept of consilience--the idea that the disciplines are seamlessly interconnected, and that knowledge at higher levels of the explanatory hierarchy (e.g., biology and psychology) is constrained by knowledge at lower levels (e.g.,...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics