Comfort and Efficacy of a Longer and Thinner Endoscope for Average Risk Colon Cancer Screening

Jonathan Myers; Scott McNear; John Liveringhouse; Richard Topolski; Jennifer McNear
October 2007
Digestive Diseases & Sciences;Oct2007, Vol. 52 Issue 10, p2892
Academic Journal
Abstract  The aim of this prospective study was to assess patient comfort during nonsedated screening sigmoidoscopy with the use of a standard 60-cm sigmoidoscope compared with a thinner 100-cm upper endoscope. Patients undergoing routine colon cancer screening with sigmoidoscopy were randomly assigned to either a 60-cm sigmoidoscope or a 100-cm upper endoscope. The procedure time, depth of insertion, anatomic landmarks, and presence of polyps were documented. Likert 7-point scales and visual analog scales (VAS) were performed to measure comfort and symptoms immediately after the procedure and again in 1 week. These scales, procedure time, insertion depth, percent reaching transverse colon, and percent with polyps were analyzed. Eighty-one patients were enrolled with 38 in the 100-cm group and 43 in the 60-cm group. Patients in the 100-cm group reported greater comfort on the VAS compared with the 60-cm group (P = .035) as well as less cramping on the initial Likert scale (P = .017). One week later, the 100-cm group reported higher comfort (P = .015) and less bloating (P = .040). Procedure time was longer for the 100-cm group (8.8 versus 5.9 minutes; P = .001). Insertion depth was 74 versus 56 cm (P = .001), and percent reaching splenic flexure was 76% versus 35% (P = .001) in the 100 and 60 cm groups, respectively. More adenomas were found with the 100-cm scope (P = .035). The use of a thinner and longer endoscope is more comfortable than a standard sigmoidoscope. Although a 100-cm endoscope procedure takes longer to perform, it allows better evaluation of the colon and misses fewer adenomas.


Related Articles

  • Colonic Polyps in an Unselected Population: Prevalence, Characteristics, and Associations. Cannon-Albright, Lisa A.; Bishop, Timothy; Samowitz, Wade; DiSario, James A.; Lee, Randall; Burt, Randall W. // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Jun1994, Vol. 89 Issue 6, p827 

    Objectives: To provide a proctosigmoidoscopic review of a very large set of unselected control subjects, providing an unbiased view of colonic polyps in the general population. Methods: Sigmoidoscopic data from 406 sequentially recruited subjects were analyzed. Participation rates were over 85%,...

  • Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening in an Industrial Setting. Krevsky, Benjamin; Niewiarowski, Tomasz; League, Rita; Herman, Harold; Matz, Lisa; Fisher, Robert S. // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Dec1992, Vol. 87 Issue 12, p1759 

    Little is known about the yield of colorectal cancer screening programs in an industrial setting. We therefore established a flexible sigmoidoscopy screening program at a chemical manufacturing plant and offered testing to all employees over the age of 40. After a Fleets enema preparation bad...

  • Pathologist Agreement in the Interpretation of Colorectal Polyps. Demers, Raymond Y.; Neale, Anne Victoria; Budev, Harish; Schade, William J. // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Apr1990, Vol. 85 Issue 4, p417 

    Practicing physicians commonly perform flexible sigmoidoscopy in their offices. Polyploid lesions are frequently biopsied and sent to community hospitals for pathological interpretation. The pathologist's opinion often determines the course of medical follow-up for the patient, especially in...

  • Screening for Colon Malignancy with Colonoscopy. Lieberman, David A.; Smith, Frederic W. // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Aug1991, Vol. 86 Issue 8, p946 

    Screening of asymptomatic individuals for colon malignancy has been advocated for the past 20 yr in the hopes of reducing colon cancer mortality. Although sigmoidoscopy is an important element of current screening recommendations, the sensitivity of this test in asymptomatic subjects has never...

  • SIGNIFICANCE OF RECTOSIGMOID ADENOMAS. Kramar, Jane; French, Linda // Journal of Family Practice;Apr1997, Vol. 44 Issue 4, p339 

    The article presents a study which investigated the importance of rectosigmoid adenomas detected by sigmoidoscopy. The increased detection of tiny adenomatous polyps in asymptomatic patients was due to the increased use of flexible sigmoidoscopy as a screening examination for colorectal...

  • What does sigmoidoscopy really miss? : Lewis JD, Kimmie NG, Hung KE, et al., Detection of proximal adenomatous polyps with screening sigmoidoscopy—a systematic review and meta-analysis of screening colonoscopy, Arch Intern Med 2003;163:413–20 Levin, Theodore R. // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Oct2003, Vol. 98 Issue 10, p2326 

    The relative effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy compared with colonoscopy to screen for colorectal cancer depends on the magnitude of the association between findings in the proximal and distal colon and the false-negative rate of screening sigmoidoscopy for proximal neoplasia. Lewis et al....

  • Virtual colonoscopy detected colorectal polyps in asymptomatic patients with average risk for colorectal neoplasia. Fletcher, Robert H. // ACP Journal Club;Jul/Aug2004, Vol. 141 Issue 1, p22 

    Virtual colonoscopy (VC) detected colorectal polyps in asymptomatic patients with average risk for colorectal neoplasia. In asymptomatic patients with average risk for colorectal neoplasia, virtual colonoscopy was sensitive and specific for detecting colorectal polyps (CO). As for the strength...

  • Introduction of flexible sigmoidoscopy in screening a 'no-brainer', say experts.  // Gastrointestinal Nursing;May2010, Vol. 8 Issue 4, p14 

    The article introduces the flexible sigmoidoscopy which is a bowel cancer screening used for prevention of colorectal cancer. It informs that this technique can detect pre-cancerous polyps, which can be removed before they turn into cancer. It also mentions that with this technique sedation or...

  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance. SHORT, MATTHEW W.; LAYTON, MILES C.; TEER, BETHANY N.; DOMAGALSKI, JASON E. // American Family Physician;1/15/2015, Vol. 91 Issue 2, p93 

    Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in men and women. The incidence and mortality rate of the disease have been declining over the past two decades because of early detection and treatment. Screening in persons at average risk should begin at 50 years of age; the U.S. Preventive...


Read the Article


Sign out of this library

Other Topics