Comparison of obstetric outcomes between on-call and patients' own obstetricians

Abenhaim, Haim A.; Benjamin, Alice; Koby, Robert D.; Kinch, Robert A.; Kramer, Michael S.
August 2007
CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;8/14/2007, Vol. 177 Issue 4, p352
Academic Journal
Background: The question "will you be delivering my baby?" is one that pregnant women frequently ask their physicians. We sought to determine whether obstetric outcomes differed between women whose babies were delivered by their own obstetrician (regular-care obstetrician) and those attended by an on-call obstetrician who did not provide antenatal care. Methods: We performed a cohort study of all live singleton term births between 1991 and 2001 at the Royal Victoria Hospital in Montreal. We excluded breech deliveries, elective cesarean sections and deliveries with placenta previa or prolapse of the umbilical cord. Logistic regression analysis was used to compare obstetric outcomes (e.g., cesarean delivery, instrumental vaginal delivery and episiotomy) between the regular-care and on-call obstetricians after adjustment for potential confounders. Results: A total of 28 332 eligible deliveries were attended by 26 obstetricians: 21 779 (76.9%) by the patient's own obstetrician and 6553 (23.1%) by the on-call obstetrician. Compared with women attended by their regular-care obstetrician, those attended by an on-call obstetrician had higher rates of cesarean delivery (11.9% v. 11.4%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.24, p < 0.01) and of third- or fourth-degree tears (7.9% v. 6.4%, adjusted OR 1.21, 95% Cl 1.07-1.36, p < 0.01) but lower rates of episiotomy (38.5% v. 42.9%, OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.72-0.82, p < 0.001). No differences were observed between the groups in the rate of instrumental vaginal delivery. The increase in the overall rate of cesarean delivery among women attended by an on-call obstetrician was due mainly to an increase in cesarean deliveries during the first stage of labour because of nonreassuring fetal heart tracing (2.9% v. 1.7%, adjusted OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.49-2.15, p < 0.001). The time of day of delivery did not modify the observed effects.


Related Articles

  • commentary. Lyerly, Anne Drapkin // Hastings Center Report;Mar/Apr2004, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p14 

    Comments on the issue of elective cesarean section. Benefits and risks of cesarean operation; Justification.

  • commentary. Schwartz, Peter // Hastings Center Report;Mar/Apr2004, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p14 

    Elaborates the moral implications of elective cesarean operation. Differences between vaginal birth and cesarean operation; Considerations that physicians need to address.

  • Is the Patient Always Right?  // Hastings Center Report;Mar/Apr2004, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p13 

    Presents the case of a pregnant woman who preferred cesarean section over vaginal birth delivery.

  • New ideas cut Caesarean rates.  // Nursing Standard;5/18/2005, Vol. 19 Issue 36, p11 

    Reports on the measures implemented at King's College Hospital in London, England, to reduce its cesarean rate. Results of regular multidisciplinary meetings between nurses, doctors and other staff to discuss its cesarean rate; Campaign to normal birth practice in the hospital.

  • Cesarean Section Delivery Rates: United States, 1981. Placek, Paul J.; Taffel, Selma; Moien, Mary // American Journal of Public Health;Aug1983, Vol. 73 Issue 8, p861 

    The rate of cesarean section delivery in the limited States has risen from 4.5 per 100 deliveries in 1965 to 17.9 in 1981. The rate is highest in the Northeast, in hospitals of 500 beds or more. in proprietary hospitals, for Blue Cross as a source of payment, and for mothers aged 35 years and...

  • Too Much of a Good Thing. Klitsch, Michael // Family Planning Perspectives;Jan/Feb93, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p2 

    The article presents information on how the weight gained during pregnancy affects labor. Women who gain a great deal of weight during pregnancy increase their risk of a difficult labor and emergency cesarean delivery. A longitudinal retrospective analysis of almost 3,200 term births in Florida...

  • The Right to Choose. Springen, Karen // Newsweek (Atlantic Edition);12/11/2000 (Atlantic Edition), Vol. 136 Issue 24, p81 

    Examines the increase in Cesarean section deliveries as of fall 2000. Campaign against non-emergency Cesarean section births by public health officials; Dangers involved with the major abdominal surgery; Facts about vaginal delivery and vaginal delivery after Cesarean.

  • operation baby. Acosta, Kim // Fit Pregnancy;Aug/Sep2005, Vol. 12 Issue 3, p50 

    Presents information on Cesarean section (C-section). Increase in the rate of C-section in the U.S. in 2003; Advantage and disadvantage of C-section; Situations that guarantee a C-section.

  • Cesarean Delivery Rate Hits All-time High. Armstrong, Carrie // American Family Physician;8/1/2007, Vol. 76 Issue 3, p444 

    The article reports on the increase in number of cesarean delivery rates in the U.S. in 2005. One in three live births was made through a cesarean delivery. The total cesarean rate in the country since 1996 rose by 46%. Cesarean delivery rates were lower in Western mountain states and upper...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics