TITLE

Mission and Mammon

AUTHOR(S)
Bonk, Jonathan J.
PUB. DATE
October 2007
SOURCE
International Bulletin of Missionary Research;Oct2007, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p169
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses various reports published within the issue which explore the relational, communicatory and ethical dynamics of gross material inequity among persons in close social proximity.
ACCESSION #
26494558

 

Related Articles

  • Fairness of Allocations among Groups of Unknown Others. Johansson, Lars-Olof // Social Justice Research;Mar2005, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p43 

    The aim of three experiments was to examine the idea that when judging the fairness of allocations people are influenced both by differences in relative payoffs and the number of comparisons among payoffs. The hypothesis tested was that judged fairness would be inversely related to the average...

  • Communitarians and Feminists: The Case of Narrative Identity. McNay, Lois // Literature & Theology;Mar2002, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p81 

    Examining the relevance of communitarian thought for feminist theory, this essay considers the idea of narrative identity in certain types of communitarianism and feminism. It claims that the particular way in which the idea of narrative identity is elaborated raises difficulties for a feminist...

  • Fairness and voting. Hahn, Volker // Social Choice & Welfare;Jun2007, Vol. 28 Issue 4, p591 

    In this paper we present a two-period model in which we examine how concern about fairness might affect voter behavior. We show that in the first period politicians choose the median voter’s position even if this does not correspond to their bliss points and neither they nor the voters...

  • Egalitarianism and the Putative Paradoxes of Population Ethics. Tännsjö, Torbjörn // Utilitas;Jun2008, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p187 

    The repugnant conclusion is acceptable from the point of view of total utilitarianism. Total utilitarians do not seem to be bothered with it. They feel that it is in no way repugnant. To me, a hard-nosed total utilitarian, this settles the case. However, if, sometimes, I doubt that total...

  • Equality, Sufficiency, and the State. Igneski, Violetta // Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review;Spring2007, Vol. 46 Issue 2, p311 

    In this article, I support the liberal claim that the state's fundamental responsibility is to ensure that persons are able to interact as equals, that is, on the basis of equal freedom. That persons must be treated as responsible agents leads to an obligation on the part of the state to ensure...

  • Signs of That Peace. SCHLABACH, GERALD W. // America;12/22/2014, Vol. 211 Issue 19, p20 

    The article presents working for peace as the vocation and mission of the Catholic Church. Topics covered include people-building, people as change agents, and God's strategic plan for peace. It discusses the justice of equality, the principles of time, unity, realities and the whole with...

  • Liberty and distribution: Macrojustice from social freedom. Kolm, Serge-Christophe // Social Choice & Welfare;Feb2004, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p113 

    Social freedom, the absence of forceful interference and the central social ethical principle of the modern world, does not imply full self-ownership, as it is classically believed, without a particular interpretation or problematic extra assumptions. It can in fact admit a notable...

  • Fairness. Hooker, Brad // Ethical Theory & Moral Practice;Dec2005, Vol. 8 Issue 4, p329 

    The main body of this paper assesses a leading recent theory of fairness, a theory put forward by John Broome. I discuss Broome's theory partly because of its prominence and partly because I think it points us in the right direction, even if it takes some missteps. In the course of discussing...

  • Reasonable Impartiality and Priority for Compatriots. A Criticism of Liberal Nationalism’s Main flaws. Bader, Veit // Ethical Theory & Moral Practice;Jan2005, Vol. 8 Issue 1/2, p83 

    Distinguishing between reasonable partiality and reasonable impartiality makes a difference in resolving the serious clashes between ‘priority for compatriots’ versus cosmopolitan global duties. Defenders of a priority for compatriots have to acknowledge two strong moral...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics