A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Management of Breast Cancer, Part 1: Prevention and Diagnosis

Pruthi, Sandhya; Brandt, Kathleen R.; Degnim, Amy C.; Goetz, Matthew P.; Perez, Edith A.; Reynolds, Carol A.; Schomberg, Paula J.; Dy, Grace K.; Ingle, James N.
August 2007
Mayo Clinic Proceedings;Aug2007, Vol. 82 Issue 8, p999
Academic Journal
Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women In the United States, with an estimated 200,000 new cases diagnosed annually. A multidisciplinary focus that entails prevention, diagnosis, and treatment has led to significant strides In the reduction of breast cancer Incidence and mortality. Additionally, breast cancer management has become increasingly complex, requiring comprehensive assessment and review of multiple Issues that include the role of genetic testing, imaging and breast magnetic resonance imaging, surgical and reconstructive options, and a variety of new adjuvant therapies. it has become more evident that a multi- disciplinary team approach that involves a spectrum of breast experts Is necessary to provide optimal care to patients. This team includes medical oncologists, breast radiologists, breast pathologists, surgical breast specialists, radiation oncologists, geneticists, and primary care physicians. Furthermore, patient knowledge has increased use of the internet, and more patients are seeking a multidisciplinary approach to treatment. This review considers information for health care professionals who will facilitate optimal patient care for women at increased risk for or presenting with a new diagnosis of breast cancer. The multidisciplinary team of authors, representing the different disciplines, has selected important state-of-the-art Issues that arise In their daily practices for consideration, rather than summarizing what Is already available In textbooks.


Related Articles

  • MRIs more accurate than mammograms but expensive. Eggertson, Laura // CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;10/12/2004, Vol. 171 Issue 8, p840 

    Focuses on two studies which investigated the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting early breast cancer. Procedures of the studies; Costs of an MRI scan compared to a mammogram; Disadvantages of mammography.

  • Breast Cancer Detection Using Support Vector Machine Technique Applied on Extracted Electromagnetic Waves. Al Sharkawy, M.; Sharkas, M.; Ragab, D. // Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal;Apr2012, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p292 

    Breast cancer is one of the most common kinds of cancer, as well as the leading cause of decease among women. Early detection and diagnosis of breast cancer increases the chances for successful treatment and complete recovery for the patient. Mammography is currently the most sensitive method to...

  • MRI boosts breast cancer screening.  // Pulse;5/21/2005, Vol. 65 Issue 20, p13 

    Reports that combined magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and mammography is the best method of detecting breast cancer in patients with high genetic risk. Study published online by "The Lancet"; Indication that MRI was nearly twice as sensitive as X-ray mammography in detecting breast cancer in...

  • Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in average-risk women aged 40-74 years.  // CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;11/22/2011, Vol. 183 Issue 17, p1991 

    The article focuses on the recommendations for the use of mammography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and clinical breast examination for screening breast cancer on women at average risk. It states that mortality reduction is greater with the use of mammography for women at average risk aged...

  • Unenhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging: detection of breast cancer. BELLI, P.; BUFI, E.; BONATESTA, A.; PATROLECCO, F.; PADOVANO, F.; GIULIANI, M.; RINALDI, P.; BONOMO, L. // European Review for Medical & Pharmacological Sciences;2016, Vol. 20 Issue 20, p4220 

    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of unenhanced MRI (UEMRI) for malignant breast lesions and its reproducibility. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included 118 patients who had breast MRI. DWI and STIR images were read in combination and referred to as UE-MRI; the...

  • Cancer surveillance based on imaging techniques in carriers of BRCA1/2 gene mutations: a systematic review. Bermejo-Pérez, M. J.; Márquez-Calderón, S.; Llanos-méndez, A. // British Journal of Radiology;Mar2008, Vol. 81 Issue 963, p172 

    We have systematically reviewed the literature focusing on the performance of surveillance programmes and imaging techniques for the early diagnosis of breast and ovarian cancer in women carrying mutations in BRCA1/2 genes. A search for relevant articles published between 1996 and 2005...

  • Imaging features of sporadic breast cancer in women under 40 years old: 97 cases. Bullier, Bénédicte; MacGrogan, Gaétan; Bonnefoi, Hervé; Hurtevent-Labrot, Gabrielle; Lhomme, Edouard; Brouste, Véronique; Boisserie-Lacroix, Martine // European Radiology;Dec2013, Vol. 23 Issue 12, p3237 

    Objectives: To evaluate characteristic features of mammography, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of sporadic breast cancer in women <40 years and to determine correlations with pathological and biological factors. Methods: A retrospective review of radiological,...

  • MRI Not Considered. Kaiser, Werner A. // Deutsches Aerzteblatt International;2/27/2009, Vol. 106 Issue 9, p2 

    The article presents the author's views on an article on the diagnostic techniques for the detection of breast cancer that was published in the journal. He says that the article does not consider the substantial diagnostic added value of modern methods, such as magnetic resonance mammography...

  • 83% false-positive risk in MRI breast cancer scans. Liddle, Rachel // GP: General Practitioner;3/28/2008, p1 

    The article reports on the result of the study which shows that the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to screen women with familial risk of breast cancer falsely detects cancer in the Netherlands. Findings reveal that the probability of women having false-positive result was 83%. The study...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics