TITLE

Firms urged to be more inclusive on disability

AUTHOR(S)
Phillips, Lucy
PUB. DATE
August 2007
SOURCE
People Management;8/9/2007, Vol. 13 Issue 16, p12
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the effort of lawyers urging employers in Great Britain to take a wider and more inclusive view of disabilities in 2007. Lawyers made the move following a ruling by the Employment Appeal Tribunal that dyslexia can be classed as a disability. Employment lawyer James Baker advised employers not to allow themselves to be caught up in technical arguments over the effect of the condition on the individual's abilities.
ACCESSION #
26324861

 

Related Articles

  • Statutory grievance procedure -- time limits in discrimination claims. Glavina, Joe // Employers Law;Apr2006, p9 

    The article reports the decision of the British Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in the joined cases of Bupa Care Homes v. Cann and Spillett v. Tesco, which concern time limits in discrimination claims. The details of both these disability discrimination claims are presented along with the key...

  • The requirement to make reasonable adjustments for a disabled job candidate did not entitle the applicant to a "soft" interview process. Malamatenios, David; Quinn, Linda; Santra, Krishna; Martins, Sandra; Rodrigues, Melissa Powys // Employers Law;Oct2013, p7 

    The article discusses a court case where the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) dismissed the claimant appeal stating that the adjustment sought by Mrs. Wade was not reasonable and tantamount to appointing her to a role where she did not meet requirement. Mrs. Wade was rejected for a job in a...

  • IN BRIEF.  // Employers Law;Jul/Aug2009, p8 

    This section offers news briefs on labor cases in Great Britain. The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has upheld a ruling that allows a disability discrimination claim brought outside the three-month time limit. In another case, the EAT ruled that a tribunal could use its discretion to extend...

  • Sex discrimination and pregnancy.  // Accountancy;Aug1985, Vol. 96 Issue 1104, p34 

    This article examines a decision of the British Employment Appeal Tribunal in Turley v. Allders Department Stores Ltd. which held that dismissal for pregnancy was not capable of constituting sex discrimination. The Tribunal affirms that it could not be direct discrimination under the Sex...

  • Moray Council v Stewart.  // Employers Law;Jul/Aug2006, p11 

    The article discusses the British Employment Appeal Tribunal case Moray Council v. Stewart. This case concerns meaning of pre-existing agreement under the Information and Consultation of Employees Regulations 2004. It presents some guidance on the requirements for a pre-existing agreement and...

  • THE POLITICS OF RACE LEGISLATION. Davies, Charlotte // People Management;9/29/2005, Vol. 11 Issue 19, p19 

    The article examines the labor case Redfearn versus Serco Ltd. in Great Britain. In this case, the Employment Appeals Tribunal was asked to decide how broadly the phrase "on racial grounds" should be construed in race discrimination claims. It decided there is no limit on the meaning of the...

  • CASE WATCH.  // Employers Law;Jul/Aug2006, p11 

    The article presents cases that affect labor law in Great Britain. The House of Lords ruled that a transfer of an undertaking under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations must take place on a specific date. In the case High Quality Lifestyles Ltd v. Watts, the...

  • Maternity leave leads to redundancy.  // Accountancy;Apr93, Vol. 111 Issue 1196, p103 

    The article reports on a case wherein the British Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has been asked to consider a situation in which a company discovered that it had an over-capacity of staff and dismissed an employee while she was on maternity leave. In the Intelligent Applications Ltd. versus...

  • Redundancy definition.  // Accountancy;Apr88, Vol. 101 Issue 1136, p48 

    This article focuses on the issue of redundancy raised by the Association of University Teachers versus University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne case in 1988. The university claimed a temporary lecturer was not redundant. They could not longer employ him because funding for the course which he taught...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics