'Black' earmarks may remain obscured under legislation in House and Senate

Crabtree, Susan
July 2007
Hill;7/24/2007, Vol. 14 Issue 89, p8
The article reports on the issue concerning the classified earmarks or the so-called black earmarks in the U.S. The said earmarks are said to remain obscure, noting that the House measure does not include language specifically focused on illuminating the secretive classified earmark process. Issue on the classified earmark provision is also discussed.


Related Articles

  • Earmark ban in Congress may hit state. Freedman, Eric // Grand Rapids Business Journal;12/13/2010, Vol. 28 Issue 51, p12 

    The author expresses opposition to a two-year moratorium on earmarks that U.S. House Republicans are planning to impose as he says it will affect various projects of states.

  • Loss of funding has groups scrambling. Philippidis, Alex // Westchester County Business Journal;1/10/2011, Vol. 47 Issue 2, p5 

    The article reports on the impact of the disapproved budget bill on the fundings for new projects by the nonprofit organizations in Westchester County, New York. It mentions that majority of the House of Representatives had opposed the plan for reserves. It states the organizations with earmarks...

  • Chambers set to do battle on earmarks. Bolton, Alexander // Hill;9/7/2007, Vol. 14 Issue 102, p1 

    The article reports on the anticipated squabble between the U.S. House and Senate over the big difference in their spending figures for earmarks. It relates that the $5 billion difference in earmarks spending proposal between the two chambers sets the stage for a difficult conference...

  • Earmarks: Online hide and go seek. Allen, Jared; Gleeson, Michael // Hill;4/8/2009, Vol. 16 Issue 41, p1 

    The article reports on the demand for full disclosures of webpages with details of U.S. House of Senate members's spending requests for 2010 to the Appropriations Committee.

  • A Dirty Word.  // America;3/14/2011, Vol. 204 Issue 8, p4 

    In this article the author discusses the benefits of earmarks or pork-barrel spending that was banned for two years by the U.S. House of Congress.

  • Party, Electoral Vulnerability, and Earmarks in the U.S. House of Representatives. Lazarus, Jeffrey // Journal of Politics;Jul2009, Vol. 71 Issue 3, p1050 

    Very little attention has been paid to the relationship between House members' electoral vulnerability and the amount of federal spending they procure for their districts. I argue that vulnerable members receive more spending than safe members, on average, but only if they are in the majority...

  • The cardinals claim they're being cut out. Bolton, Alexander; Soraghan, Mike // Hill;3/12/2008, Vol. 15 Issue 29, p1 

    The article reports that senior Democrat members of the House Appropriations Committee are complaining about their alleged exclusion from Speaker Nancy Pelosi's moratorium discussions on earmarks in the U.S.

  • Earmark scofflaws likely to get pass.  // Hill;4/23/2009, Vol. 16 Issue 45, p10 

    The article reports on the move of the House Appropriations Committee to issue passes for members who are seeking earmarks to post an active link on their congressional websites in the U.S.

  • Cutting the pork in Congress. MERRION, PAUL // Crain's Chicago Business;11/22/2010, Vol. 33 Issue 47, p3 

    The article reports that Illinois may lose its battle to get bills containing earmarks, passed by the U.S. House. It states that the Republican takeover the U.S. House dooms pet projects earmarked by Illinois Democrats. It includes 6.4 million dollars in titanium machining equipment for the Rock...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics