TITLE

EXPERIENCIAS EDITORIALES en revistas académicas multidisciplinares

AUTHOR(S)
Redonda, Mesa
PUB. DATE
June 2007
SOURCE
Estudios Sobre las Culturas Contemporáneas;jun2007, Vol. 13 Issue 25, p110
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
No abstract available.
ACCESSION #
26112362

 

Related Articles

  • Requisitos de los trabajos que se deseen enviar.  // Revista Española de Pedagogía;2007, Issue 237, p389 

    No abstract available.

  • Normas editoriales.  // Signos Históricos;jul-dic2002, Issue 8, p183 

    No abstract available.

  • Templates for Academic Writing. Broekhoff, Marna // Nawa: Journal of Language & Communication;2008, Vol. 2 Issue 2, p129 

    The classic writing center image of the Burkean parlor can be applied to all academic writing, both quantitative and qualitative. Yet most student writers, particularly those with linguistic, cultural, and academic diversity, so common in southern Africa, have great difficulties entering any...

  • DEL DICTAMEN Y LA RESEÑA, AL ARTÍCULO CIENTÍFICO. Covarrubias Cuéllar, Karla Y. // Estudios Sobre las Culturas Contemporáneas;jun2007, Vol. 13 Issue 25, p57 

    No abstract available.

  • BEING SCHEHERAZADE: THE IMPORTANCE OF STORYTELLING IN ACADEMIC WRITING. Pollock, Timothy G.; Bono, Joyce E. // Academy of Management Journal;Jun2013, Vol. 56 Issue 3, p629 

    The authors offer opinions on authorship of academic discourse. It is stated that too many scholars seeking to be published ignore the value of narrative storytelling in presenting their research. The need to include a human element in presenting research is seen as vital. the importance of...

  • Directives: Argument and Engagement in Academic Writing. Hyland, Ken // Applied Linguistics;Jun2002, Vol. 23 Issue 2, p215 

    Successful academic writing involved both clear exposition and appropriate audience relationships, but the use of directives potentially undermines the harmony of such relationships. Because they instruct the reader to perform an action or to see things in a way determined by the writer,...

  • Ch-ch-ch changes. Radak, Janice T. // Geriatrics;Feb2005, Vol. 60 Issue 2, p6 

    Explains that the scholarly periodical "Geriatrics" is dependent on the peer-review process, whereby designated experts agree to review the academic writing of others, make constructive commentary, and pass judgment on publication worthiness. Insights into manuscripts, graphics, and reference...

  • The Art of Confusion. Dale, Edgar // Education Digest;Mar1949, Vol. 14 Issue 7, p37 

    The article points out that too much scholarly writing is of the flat, attenuated type. It is common for academics and scholars in the United States to consciously make their academic writing difficult to understand. Such writing make too much use of adjectives and often try not to be blunt....

  • The Researcher as a Consumer of Scientific Publications: How Do Name-Ordering Conventions Affect Inferences About Contribution Credits? Maciejovsky, Boris; Budescu, David V.; Ariely, Dan // Marketing Science;May/Jun2009, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p589 

    When researchers from different fields with different norms collaborate, the question arises of how name-ordering conventions are chosen and how they affect contribution credits. In this paper, we answer these questions by studying two disciplines that exemplify the two cornerstones of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics