TITLE

On Functional and Procedural Art Definitions

AUTHOR(S)
Österman, Bernt
PUB. DATE
September 1998
SOURCE
Journal of Aesthetic Education;Fall98, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p67
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article demonstrates the distinction between functionalism and proceduralism in art definitions. Using the terminology by S. Davies, functional definition of art includes the fulfillment of the essential function of art as a necessary condition, whereas a procedural definition of art states that works of art are items on which the status of art has been conferred. The author suggested that a functional definition of art should be constructed with having the essential function of art as a necessary condition.
ACCESSION #
26066137

 

Related Articles

  • Peeks and Piques! Steiner, Raymond J. // Art Times;Sep/Oct2009, Vol. 26 Issue 2, p2 

    The article focuses on the changes in the academic principles in art which affect the concept of beauty. It has been cited that the concept of beauty is created based on the vision of modern art and its history. However, the value of art will depend upon the future changes. Moreover, the value...

  • Aesthetic and Artistic, Two Separate Concepts: The Dangers of 'Aesthetic Education'. Best, David // Journal for the Anthropological Study of Human Movement;Autumn2006, Vol. 14 Issue 2, p67 

    The article examines the distinction between aesthetic and artistic concepts in aesthetic education. It cites that aesthetic feeling refers to the recognition or full appreciation of certain activity by someone who has knowledge about it, while artistic feeling serves as a response to the works...

  • Unhealthful trend. Martin, Paul R. // Copyediting;Dec2012/Jan2013, p12 

    The article presents the author's insights concerning the distinction between the terms healthful and healthy.

  • The Trouble with (the Term) Art. Dean, Carolyn // Art Journal;Summer2006, Vol. 65 Issue 2, p24 

    The article explores the various perception of artists on the definition of art. Some considers that art is only a thing of the past as they bring back to life what has been lost. Art is a difficult term to define because it has no exact definition and agreed-upon usage. The usage of art in the...

  • SENSIBILIDAD, INTELIGENCIA Y CONCIENCIA: REFLEXIONES SOBRE LA MODERNIDAD DE LAS VANGUARDIAS. Amigo, Jaime Cuenca // Estudios Filosóficos;ene-abr2006, Vol. 55 Issue 158, p27 

    Starting from the emergence of impressionism in France before the 1870s, art acquires some distinct characters that allow one to differentiate it from the whole artistic activity of the earlier times under the denomination of "modern art." The transgression of the traditional conventions is...

  • A DICTIONARY OF THE AVANT-GARDE. Kostelanetz, Richard // Provincetown Arts;1993, Vol. 9, p126 

    Focuses on the avant-garde art. Definition of avant-garde; Characteristics of the avant-garde art; Past that avant-garde aims to surpass.

  • Why Define 'Art'? Fenner, David E. W. // Journal of Aesthetic Education;Spring94, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p71 

    The article discusses various ways on defining art. According to the author, using the word art apparently refer to some objects or events in the world. The author noted that art is a label properly applied when it is applied, with those objects that fail to be so labeled constituting that set...

  • Borders of Art Criticism and Philosophy of Art in the Thought of Arthur Danto. Sharifzadeh, Muhammad Reza // Art Alchemy / Kimiaye-Honar;Fall2012, Issue 4, p110 

    Danto's philosophical approach determines his methodical and theoretical discipline in philosophy of art and aesthetics. To start understanding his theories and philosophical thoughts, it is better first to ask what his understanding of philosophy is and what method he offers for philosophical...

  • Is Art Modern? Kristeller's 'Modern System of the Arts' Reconsidered. Porter, James I. // British Journal of Aesthetics;Jan2009, Vol. 49 Issue 1, p1 

    Kristeller's article 'The Modern System of the Arts: A Study in the History of Aesthetics' is a classic statement of the view, now widely adopted but rarely examined, that aesthetics became possible only in the eighteenth-century with the emergence of the fine arts. I wish to contest this...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics